On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria
wrote:
> 2010/11/20 Nikki
>
> Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
>>
>> > Either we decide to keep those ARs at Track level and have them
>> > automatically replicated to works (clumsy IMO) or we get rid of those
>> ARs at
>> > Track level and decide t
2010/11/20 Alex Mauer
> On 11/20/2010 4:36 AM, Nikki wrote:
> > Hmm... the problem I had was that just saying "work or recording" sounds
> > weird to me, like we can't decide where to put things or something (if
> > that makes sense...), but maybe it's just me. :)
>
> Well, if the ARs only apply
2010/11/20 Nikki
> Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
>
> > Either we decide to keep those ARs at Track level and have them
> > automatically replicated to works (clumsy IMO) or we get rid of those ARs
> at
> > Track level and decide that they should be used only at Work or Recording
> > level. In the fi
On 11/20/2010 4:36 AM, Nikki wrote:
> Hmm... the problem I had was that just saying "work or recording" sounds
> weird to me, like we can't decide where to put things or something (if
> that makes sense...), but maybe it's just me. :)
Well, if the ARs only apply to one or the other, it mostly does
Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
> Either we decide to keep those ARs at Track level and have them
> automatically replicated to works (clumsy IMO) or we get rid of those ARs at
> Track level and decide that they should be used only at Work or Recording
> level. In the first case, the section still appl
Alex Mauer wrote:
> I think only some minor changes are necessary:
>
> 1. If the relationship is applicable to all tracks on a release, apply
> it to every work or recording on the release.
> 2. If the relationship applies to only a few tracks, and you know which
> ones, apply it only to those w
On 11/18/2010 04:14 PM, Nikki wrote:
> Right now I really like how clear it is and I can't seem to come up with
> anything that's not difficult to follow, so I figured I'd ask here and
> see if anyone has any decent suggestions.
I think only some minor changes are necessary:
1. If the relationshi
2010/11/18 Nikki
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've been trying to work out how update the "Artist Role Inheritance &
> Track vs Release crediting" section of
>
> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Advanced_Relationship_Style#Artist_Role_Inheritance_.26_Track_vs_Release_crediting
> for NGS.
>
> As you hopefully kn
On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 23:14 +0100, Nikki wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've been trying to work out how update the "Artist Role Inheritance &
> Track vs Release crediting" section of
> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Advanced_Relationship_Style#Artist_Role_Inheritance_.26_Track_vs_Release_crediting
>
Hi everyone,
I've been trying to work out how update the "Artist Role Inheritance &
Track vs Release crediting" section of
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Advanced_Relationship_Style#Artist_Role_Inheritance_.26_Track_vs_Release_crediting
for NGS.
As you hopefully know, tracks will become recordin
10 matches
Mail list logo
