On Mar 6, 2006, at 12:57 PM, Robert Kaye wrote:
I'm currently mulling it over -- I'll re-read the threads and figure
out our next step later today/tomorrow.
OK, that obviously didn't happen. :-(
Just to let you know, its near the top of my TODO list and you will
hear from me on this soon.
On Mar 5, 2006, at 2:39 PM, Don Redman wrote:
like i said my opinion is if it's a DVD of a concert or
performance, it
doesn't belong in MB unless it's added as a bootleg.
Right, I observe dissensus. Now we can either ask Robert, or decide
to leave the issue without a guideline (that was
I'm still confused as to why are we putting DVDs into MB? MB has no way
of providing information to DVD players does it?
like i said my opinion is if it's a DVD of a concert or performance, it
doesn't belong in MB unless it's added as a bootleg. the word DVD won't
even be an issue as the title
On 3/2/06, Don Redman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 01 Mar 2006 18:50:17 +0100, Björn Krombholz wrote:
Yes, we do. That's why shepard didn't ask for a guideline on this, and
that's why I don't want to see a guideline for this as well. It should
be kept as it is, allow people to add this
On 2/15/06, Don Redman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I observe that there seems to be consensus in this matter. So, although
Simon has not asked for an official rule, one has emerged. It looks
someway like this (taken from Nikki's mail):
* The titles of DVDs are treated like CDs. No extra
