The capitalization standard for English requires the word "with" be
capitalized since it's more than three letters. There are a lot of
corrections where "with" is being used in lowercase as a connector in artist
credits. Should we have a policy one way or the other for this?
--Torc.
_
Ryan Torchia wrote:
>
> The capitalization standard for English requires the word "with" be
> capitalized since it's more than three letters. There are a lot of
> corrections where "with" is being used in lowercase as a connector in
> artist
> credits. Should we have a policy one way or the oth
On 12 July 2011 09:17, jacobbrett wrote:
>
> Ryan Torchia wrote:
>>
>> The capitalization standard for English requires the word "with" be
>> capitalized since it's more than three letters. There are a lot of
>> corrections where "with" is being used in lowercase as a connector in
>> artist
>> cr
Ryan Torchia wrote:
> The capitalization standard for English requires the word "with" be
> capitalized since it's more than three letters. There are a lot of
> corrections where "with" is being used in lowercase as a connector in artist
> credits. Should we have a policy one way or the other
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Simon Reinhardt
wrote:
> Ryan Torchia wrote:
>> The capitalization standard for English requires the word "with" be
>> capitalized since it's more than three letters. There are a lot of
>> corrections where "with" is being used in lowercase as a connector in art
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Simon Reinhardt
> wrote:
>> Ryan Torchia wrote:
>>> The capitalization standard for English requires the word "with" be
>>> capitalized since it's more than three letters. There are a lot of
>>> corrections where "with" is b
Am 12.07.2011, 10:17 Uhr, schrieb jacobbrett :
> My rationale for lowercase is that with is akin to extra title
> information
> [1]; it is not part of an artist's title, but acts as descriptive text.
+1
--
lorenz pressler
PGP 0x92E9551A
___
MusicBr
2011/7/12 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Simon Reinhardt
> wrote:
>
> > Shouldn't artist credits completely follow the release, including
> capitalisation, just like track titles?
>
> Should track titles completely follow the release, even When It's All
> Like This
2011/7/13, Ryan Torchia :
> 2011/7/12 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
>
>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Simon Reinhardt
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Shouldn't artist credits completely follow the release, including
>> capitalisation, just like track titles?
>>
>> Should track titles completely follow the rele
2011/7/13, Frederic Da Vitoria :
> 2011/7/13, Ryan Torchia :
>> 2011/7/12 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Simon Reinhardt
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Shouldn't artist credits completely follow the release, including
>>> capitalisation, just like track titles?
>>>
>>> Sh
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 1:22 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
> From my non-English's point of view, I prefer "with" to "With",
> precisely because it is different. I always find disturbing that there
> is no way to distinguish what we add to titles / names from what was
> actually in those titles /
2011/7/13, Ryan Torchia :
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 1:22 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria
> wrote:
>
>> From my non-English's point of view, I prefer "with" to "With",
>> precisely because it is different. I always find disturbing that there
>> is no way to distinguish what we add to titles / names from wha
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 2:42 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
> 2011/7/13, Ryan Torchia :
> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 1:22 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria
> > wrote:
> >
> >> From my non-English's point of view, I prefer "with" to "With",
> >> precisely because it is different. I always find disturbing that
2011/7/14 Ryan Torchia
>
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 2:42 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria
> wrote:
>
>> 2011/7/13, Ryan Torchia :
>> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 1:22 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> From my non-English's point of view, I prefer "with" to "With",
>> >> precisely because it is d
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Ryan Torchia wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 2:42 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria
> wrote:
>>
>> 2011/7/13, Ryan Torchia :
>> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 1:22 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> From my non-English's point of view, I prefer "with" to "With",
15 matches
Mail list logo