I just had the case "Message-Id: something" in one email, and
"References/In-Reply-To: " in replies.
As a result mutt failed to recognize that both mails are indeed one single
thread.
Are the less-than and greater-than signs supposed to be part of the of the
message id? In other words: is it s
On Wed, 2023-05-24 18:29:31 +0200, Olaf Hering wrote:
> [..]
>
> Are the less-than and greater-than signs supposed to be part of the of the
> message id? In other words: is it supposed to be a "raw string", with just
> the surrounding blanks removed?
>
>From RFC 5322: “The message identifier (
On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 07:54:32PM +0200, Ludolf Holzheid wrote:
> From RFC 5322: "The message identifier (msg-id) syntax is a limited
> version of the addr-spec construct enclosed in the
> angle bracket characters, "<" and ">"."
> That is, the less-than and greater
Hi,
On Wednesday, 2023-05-24 21:34:08 +0100, Ian Collier wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 07:54:32PM +0200, Ludolf Holzheid wrote:
> > From RFC 5322: "The message identifier (msg-id) syntax is a limited
> > version of the addr-spec construct enclosed in the
> > ang
On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 10:24:52AM +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
> >Semantically, the angle bracket characters are not part of the
> >msg-id; the msg-id is what is contained between the two angle bracket
> >characters.
>
> *Semantically*
> MUAs don't interpret semantics of header fields.
On Thu, 2023-05-25 10:59:38 +0100, Ian Collier wrote:
> [..]
>
> Yes, the original MUA is 100% wrong on that point. The question here is
> whether Mutt should compensate for it (see "Robustness principle").
But for the scenario Olaf described, Mutt comes only into play when
the child has already
On Thu, 25.May.23 10:27:48 +, mutt-dev-requ...@mutt.org wrote:
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 12:25:42 +0200
> From: Ludolf Holzheid
> To: mutt-dev@mutt.org
> Subject: Re: What is a Message-id?
> Message-ID: <20230525102542.ga10...@mail.bihl-wiedemann.de>
On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 06:29:31PM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote:
I just had the case "Message-Id: something" in one email, and
"References/In-Reply-To: " in replies.
As a result mutt failed to recognize that both mails are indeed one
single thread.
I just looked at the current Mutt source (rele
