Re: Much thanks..

1999-02-04 Thread Daniel Eisenbud
On Wed, Feb 03, 1999 at 08:45:11PM -0800, Joe Rhett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > It was found that sendmail's -f option will allow you to forge the > > > > envelope line. Adding myself as a (Thypnotik) trusted user to sendmail's > > > > configuration file ceased the X-Authentication warnin

Re: Much thanks..

1999-02-04 Thread Joe Rhett
> > In any case, it isn't the right answer. UserDB or genericstable are the > > general approaches to doing exactly what he needs. > And this provides a specific approach to doing exactly what he needs. > What makes it not the right approach? Yes, there are other perfectly > good ways of doing

Re: Much thanks..

1999-02-04 Thread Daniel Eisenbud
On Wed, Feb 03, 1999 at 09:34:52PM -0800, Joe Rhett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > In any case, it isn't the right answer. UserDB or genericstable are the > > > general approaches to doing exactly what he needs. > > > And this provides a specific approach to doing exactly what he needs. > >

Re: Forging headers

1999-02-04 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Tue, Feb 02, 1999 at 07:17:20PM +, Adam M. Costello wrote: > synthpunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I subscribed to a mailing list @ eGroups.com, and it takes the From > > line rather than the From: line as which address to send mail to. the > > list is setup to not allow unsubscribed

Re: Forging headers

1999-02-04 Thread Joe Rhett
> I use mutt to change my From: header to appear to be from > [EMAIL PROTECTED] when I am sending mail from my main machine. I > subscribed to a mailing list @ eGroups.com, and it takes the From line > rather than the From: line as which address to send mail to. the list is > setup to not allow

Re: Duplicate mails - recovering

1999-02-04 Thread mojo
Thank you. JFWIW, I found the attached snippet from some documention I got a while ago from: ftp://cs.uta.fi/pub/ssjaaa/pm-tips.html Incidentially, I see this documentation is actually maintained by J. Alto but the recipes herein pertaining to duplicates seem simpler. rfi from Rich Roth ([EMA

Re: Duplicate mails - recovering

1999-02-04 Thread Daniel Eisenbud
On Wed, Feb 03, 1999 at 10:27:43PM -0500, rfi from Rich Roth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just a note: > If you didn't have formail -D in your .procmailrc file > > To clear the dups try: > ls -l mutt-l > formail -q- -D 8192 id-cache mutt-fixed > mv mutt-

Re: Duplicate mails - recovering

1999-02-04 Thread Daniel Eisenbud
On Thu, Feb 04, 1999 at 01:26:10AM -0800, Daniel Eisenbud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is generally a good idea, but I just wanted to caution people that > if someone sends you mail from a broken mailer that generates the same > message-id more than once, this will throw away legitimate mail

Missing mail bodies

1999-02-04 Thread Patrick Colbeck
Hi I am running Mutt 0.95.1i that came with Debian 2.1 Slink. In the main its working great but I am getting quite a few mails that show up with headers but empty bodies. If I cat the spool file the body is there but Mutt doesnt display it and also if mutt moves the message to another folder it r

Re: Missing mail bodies

1999-02-04 Thread Daniel Eisenbud
On Thu, Feb 04, 1999 at 09:56:20AM +, Patrick Colbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am running Mutt 0.95.1i that came with Debian 2.1 Slink. In the main its > working great but I am getting quite a few mails that show up with headers > but empty bodies. If I cat the spool file the body is th

Re: Missing mail bodies

1999-02-04 Thread Patrick Colbeck
On Thu Feb 04, 1999 at 02:08:14AM -0800, Daniel Eisenbud wrote: > > It's hard to tell from the info you've given us. Can you send us a > sample mailbox like this (preferably make a copy of a mailbox you have, > and delete all but one or two messages.) What output does "mutt -v" > give you? Do

Re: Missing mail bodies

1999-02-04 Thread Daniel Eisenbud
On Thu, Feb 04, 1999 at 10:27:20AM +, Patrick Colbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu Feb 04, 1999 at 02:08:14AM -0800, Daniel Eisenbud wrote: > > > > It's hard to tell from the info you've given us. Can you send us a > > sample mailbox like this (preferably make a copy of a mailbox you

I'm back with another inane question :)

1999-02-04 Thread synthpunk
Attempting to compile mutt on a BSD/OS 4.0 machine generates this error when compiling: (successful run w/configure): color.c: In function `ci_start_color': color.c:134: `A_NORMAL' undeclared (first use this function) color.c:134: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once .. [snip, more

Re: 0.95.1i weirdness

1999-02-04 Thread Michael Jennings
On Thursday, 04 February 1999, at 04:25:11 (+), David Allen wrote: > The problem is that while it will read my .muttrc and will complain about > problems with it, it WONT use the color scheme I told it to. I'm using > an rxvt and on the terminal, and in neither case does it say anything > >

Inane question (2nd try)

1999-02-04 Thread synthpunk
Apologies if this is a double post ;) Compiling mutt 0.95.1 on BSD/OS 4.0 autoconf succeeds after a $SENDMAIL declaration (BSD/OS 4.0's /bin/sh gets a syntax error during sendmail checking in the configure script) which would indicate that mutt found a proper library. (ncurses/slang) while comp

A second problem..

1999-02-04 Thread synthpunk
I installed slang, compiled mutt and installed it underneath my home directory. the dotlock program, mutt and the Muttrc are in place with prefix=/usr/home/hypnotik .. earth% ls -l /var/mail/hypnotik -rw--- 1 hypnotik user 654 Feb 4 15:35 /var/mail/hypnotik earth% export MAIL=/var/mail

Re: [Q] mutt refuses to send mail, too.

1999-02-04 Thread Victor Titov
Hi Axel, On Tue, Feb 02, 1999 at 10:29:23PM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote: > The funny thing is, that on one IPC it works fine and on a second > (according to our operators :-) completely similiar IPC (due tue NFS > mounted mutt binaries, config files and user home directories) it does > not work, g

Bus error on Solaris

1999-02-04 Thread Stephen Martin
I built mutt on my solaris 2.4 machine and when I run it under my username to blows up immediately with a Bus Error. If I run it as root it works ok. Has anyone else seen this? Steve -- __ Stephen Martin _ _ |/_ \ MORTICE KERN SYSTEMS INC. [EM

Re: Bus error on Solaris

1999-02-04 Thread Daniel Eisenbud
On Thu, Feb 04, 1999 at 02:26:13PM -0500, Stephen Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I built mutt on my solaris 2.4 machine and when I run it under > my username to blows up immediately with a Bus Error. If I > run it as root it works ok. Has anyone else seen this? Did you forget to specify --wi

mailcap and autoview

1999-02-04 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi; I've got some problems with autoviewing html messages. It seems as if mutt doesn't find my $HOME/.mailcap for use with autoview. The appropriate part of my .muttrc is auto_view text/html alternative_order text/enriched text/html text/plain text/* and my ~/.mailcap contains

Re: mailcap and autoview

1999-02-04 Thread Brandon Long
On 02/04/99 Axel Beckert uttered the following other thing: > Hi; > > and my ~/.mailcap contains > > text/html;/usr/local/bin/lynx -child -emacskeys -force_html %s Perhaps the hint is the part of the manual which states: 5.4 MIME Autoview ... To work, you must define a viewer in the mail

Re: mailcap and autoview

1999-02-04 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi; > > text/html;/usr/local/bin/lynx -child -emacskeys -force_html %s > To work, you must define a viewer in the mailcap file which uses the > copiousoutput option to denote that it is non-interactive. Usually, you > also use the entry to convert the attachment to a text representation > which

2 mutt crashes

1999-02-04 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi; here is the data of two mutt crashes today (had some more, so these are just exemplarily. :-) (I was told to post it here, because mutt-dev is a closed list...) P.S.: ~/.mutt/config.tcsh is sourced in my .tcshrc... Regards, Axel -- Axel Beckert - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://w5.cs.

Re: 2 mutt crashes

1999-02-04 Thread Daniel Eisenbud
On Fri, Feb 05, 1999 at 01:08:42AM +0100, Axel Beckert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi; > > here is the data of two mutt crashes today (had some more, so these > are just exemplarily. :-) [...] > +USE_IMAP +USE_POP -HAVE_REGCOMP +USE_GNU_RX +HAVE_COLOR +HAVE_PGP2 >-BUFFY_SIZE

PGP

1999-02-04 Thread cooking
-- Hello to all being a newbie to debian and to mutt can some one explain what and how PGP works i have mutt 0.95i installed but i don't know how to use PGP? :-) "CAR'N THE SAINTS" Craig McVean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

Re: replying to this list

1999-02-04 Thread Brian D. Winters
On Wed, Feb 03, 1999 at 06:32:39AM -0500, David Thorburn-Gundlach wrote: > Oh, wait a second... I guess I take that back; I tried to set > "pgp_default_version" to "gpg" and when I selected "sign (a)s" from > the pgp menu I got > > sh: gpg043m: command not found Can't open your secret key

Re: PGP

1999-02-04 Thread Juergen Leising
On Fri, Feb 05, 1999 at 11:23:09PM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > -- > Hello to all being a newbie to debian and to mutt can some one explain what and how >PGP works i have mutt 0.95i installed but i don't know how to use PGP? :-) > "CAR'N THE SAINTS" > Craig McVean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.