Hi
How would I enter a send hook command into my muttrc so that it inserts a
different signature conditional upon the recipient?
Better still is it possible to always send my standard signature but then
to have a say privacy warning printed below it conditional upon the
recipient.
Thanx
--
Eri
on Jul 02, Eric Smith wrote:
> Hi
>
> How would I enter a send hook command into my muttrc so that it inserts a
> different signature conditional upon the recipient?
I personally use the followings when posting to mutt-users-list (English
speaking):
#
#Specify signature and attribution with respe
On Wed, Jun 30, 1999 at 08:30:13PM +0200, Byrial Jensen wrote:
>| On Sun, Jun 27, 1999 at 13:53:52 +0200, Salvatore Sciacco wrote:
>| > Hello,
>| > when your are reading messages with the pager it would be useful to have
>| > some information about how many unread (new/old) messages you have left
On Fri, Jul 02, 1999 at 10:24:08AM +0200, Eric Smith wrote:
> Hi
>
> How would I enter a send hook command into my muttrc so that it inserts a
> different signature conditional upon the recipient?
Default behaviour:
==
send-hook .* 'set signature="~/.mutt/randsig3.pl $HOME/.sig
Shao --
Jeremy is right; mutt is doing everything that it should. He left out
one item, though -- when you read your message with mutt and see
...and then Jeremy Blosser said...
% Shao Zhang [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
% > I am trying to get my PGP work with mutt.
% > But my sent message
Shao Zhang dixit:
> [ ... pgp/mime sig ... ]
All the stuff you say means it was PGP/MIME signed. With PGP/MIME the
signature is sent as an attachment, and it applies to the whole message
(including any other attachment), not just the text part of it.
You have no need to see the all the scramble
Trey --
[one big outbox to sort and save to many force_name and save_name boxes]
I have two ideas:
1) Load the outbox in mutt, turn on save_name, sort by sender, and use
tagging to cruise through and save each recipient's letter. This will
cost you the time it takes to tag messages (probably s
David DeSimone wrote:
> So don't leave Mutt.
>
> macro index G "fetchmail"
Sweet.
Thomas Roessler wrote:
>> Me too. Just thought it might be convenient sometimes to not have
>> to leave mutt.
>
> So just run fetchmail in daemon mode.
Not very convenient on a dialup connection. Usually when
I want my mail I want it NOW! (yes, I know about demand
dialing) I think the macro sui
Randall J. Million wrote:
> Write a macro that will call fetchmail. Should work, but I don't use
> fetchmail.
I'll look into that.
Hey those are great ideas! Thanks a bunch.
On Fri, Jul 02, 1999 at 10:54:04AM -0400, David Thorburn-Gundlach wrote:
> Trey --
>
> [one big outbox to sort and save to many force_name and save_name boxes]
>
> I have two ideas:
>
> 1) Load the outbox in mutt, turn on save_name, sort by sender, a
Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Did somebody say "changes"? Here, take a look at the history:
> http://www.math.fu-berlin.de/~guckes/mutt/hist.html
* Jeremy Blosser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [990701 23:54]:
> FYI, all the 'changelog' links on this page seem to be dead.
Oops - the symli
> > I just got around to trying it, but I can't get it to work. It will
> > mark all the messages in the current folder for deletion (even those
> > marked N or O).
>
> I didn't just write the above macro off-the-cuff. I actually tried it
> out, and got it working, exactly as you see it above.
For some reason, most color combinations work fine - but if I try to
higlight anything with the same background and foreground color, it does
strange things. For example,
color subject brightblue blue
gives me a bright white on black text (just boldfaced, not blue
anywhere.) This stands out ag
On Mon, Jun 28, 1999 at 12:23:01PM -0700, Martin Hillyer wrote:
> lines and arrows are shown; however sometimes messages are
> shown as part of a particular thread when the subject is
> completely different, and sometimes a message with a subject
> Re: foo_bar will be shown right below the origina
Excerpts from mail: 29-Jun-99 Re: installation errors for.. by Lars
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I have repeatedly posted patches to fix building outside the source
> directory, but they have never made it into the source tree ...
Can you point me to some? I was unable to find your patches on a brief
Excerpts from mail: 30-Jun-99 Re: installation errors for.. by David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 1. When Mutt is started or ended, it insists on doing a message count
> > in the current folder.
>
> When Mutt is started, it reads your inbox. What on earth would you want
> Mutt to do besides show you
On Fri, Jul 02, 1999 at 11:04:04 +0200, Renaud Colinet wrote:
> I personally use the followings when posting to mutt-users-list (English
> speaking):
> #
> #Specify signature and attribution with respect to recipient
>
> send-hook . set signature=~/.signature
> send-hook . 'set attribution="le %d
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > So just run fetchmail in daemon mode.
>
> Not very convenient on a dialup connection. Usually when I want my
> mail I want it NOW! (yes, I know about demand dialing) I think the
> macro suits me perfectly.
You can start fetchmail from your /etc/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well what I really want is to be able to delete only the message that
> is currently selected, based on the criteria.
Since the message is selected, you can look at the flags and easily see
if you should press the "d" key or not. No? I'm sorry if
Benjamin Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> application/octet-stream; cat "%s"; copiousoutput
> text/*; cat "%s"; copiousoutput
>
> Should mutt be quoting the parameter it passes?
Mutt does do that. Whether it "should" has been the subject of some
debate. Mutt is trying to be secure, by doi
hello,
i'm moving from exmh to mutt. i have a lot of mail in many
mh-format folders. some of these folders are nested too.
there are many things i like about mutt, but there are some
things that i miss about exmh. one of them is what's called
the "unseen window." what this does is open a l
Pete Toscano [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> second, whenever i go into
> "folder view" from a directory (by hitting c and then typing
> "?"), everything in my folder (~/Mail) is shown. i have to
> hit TAB to only see the mailboxes. is there a config option
> that i can set to make this automati
David DeSimone wrote:
> You can start fetchmail from your /etc/ppp/ip-up script, and kill it in
> your /etc/ppp/ip-down script. The next best thing to being there.
Don't like that either. Although I send my mail that way..
The
macro index G "fetchmail"
is more what I was looking for.
Hi, folks --
I have taken to storing letters in my mailbox when I have read them but
still want a reminder that there's something to do. I'm interested in
adding additional flags; I know about NOrD and KPSM as well as FCT+*!
but envisioned packing a few extra flags, such as t(ask), m(isc), b(ulk
Barbara --
...and then Barbara K Jensen said...
% Excerpts from mail: 30-Jun-99 Re: installation errors for.. by David
% [EMAIL PROTECTED]
% > > 1. When Mutt is started or ended, it insists on doing a message count
% >
% > When Mutt is started, it reads your inbox. What on earth would you wa
On Fri, Jul 02, 1999, David Thorburn-Gundlach ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
|
| I have taken to storing letters in my mailbox when I have read them but
| still want a reminder that there's something to do. I'm interested in
| adding additional flags; I know about NOrD and KPSM as well as FCT+*!
| but
27 matches
Mail list logo
