Greetings,
I'm trying to achieve the following 4 behaviors:
1. In the folder "stuff", use the signature file ~/.sig and the address
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
otherwise, use the default From: address and no sig
2. On any new message or replies to *@stuff.com, use the address
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
o
> P.S.
> Since I'm writing anyway, could someone repost the procmail rule to
> turn non-MIME PGP signatures into MIME compliant attachments?
## PGP -- This converts from the old style PGP mail, to the MIME style
## that Mutt likes. This recipe is from doc/mutt/PGP-Notes.txt
##
:0
* !
Matt Hyclak [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> For some reason I can't seem to pin down, mutt doesn't want to use gnupg
> anymore. It detects it when I run ./configure, but when reading signed
> messages, it shows the signature as an attachment
>
>[-- Attachment #2 --]
>[-- Type: application/pg
On 1999-09-28 12:04:17 -0500, David DeSimone wrote:
> There is s save-decode command, but I don't know if weeding headers
> is part of the decode process.
With unstable, it is.
On Tue, 28 Sep 1999, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 2) Can mutt determine the content type of the file being attached ?
>Normally one presses ^T and types it thereafter.
Mutt tries to determine the MIME type by checking the file extension
against ~/.mime.types or /etc/mime.types.
> 3) Can one s
On Tue, Sep 28, 1999 at 12:04:17PM -0500, David DeSimone thus spoke:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 5) Can one convert a .PST file to unix-like(text) format ?
>
> What's a .PST file?
Microsoft Outlook's P.O.S. excuse for a folder format. And I'm -guessing-
the answer is no,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 1) Though we can weed-out the headers while forwarding and viewing,
>can I do the same while saving the headers (automatically) ?
> [ I don't want to save the headers like - "Received: from ..." !]
I think it is short-sighted to not want to
It seems to me that I should be able to do the following:
Select a message with multiple MIME attachments and hit 'v' to go into
the attachments menu, tag one or more of the attachments then type
';f' to forward tagged attachments.
Mutt allows me to go through the procedure, but doesn't forward
Martin Keseg - Sun Slovakia - SE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> btw which manual do you using ? http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/ ?
I use the manual that comes with Mutt: /opt/mutt/doc/mutt/manual.txt.
It might be /usr/local/lib/mutt/manual.txt on your system, or wherever.
--
David DeSimone |
Hi,
I am using mutt for sometime and have these Qs:
1) Though we can weed-out the headers while forwarding and viewing, can I do the
same while saving the headers (automatically) ?
[ I don't want to save the headers like - "Received: from ..." !]
2) Can mutt determine the content type of
> > (2) I received e-mail which had UTF-8 in the headers, like this:
> >
> > From: "Kalle XXXä" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > That's a 2-byte encoding of ä. Is there an RFC that permits or
> > forbids this? Should this really have been something like:
>
> rfc822 only allows 7bit in the heade
On 1999-09-28 15:31:33 +0200, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
> (2) I received e-mail which had UTF-8 in the headers, like this:
>
> From: "Kalle XXXä" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> That's a 2-byte encoding of ä. Is there an RFC that permits or
> forbids this? Should this really have been something l
(1) Is it possible to run mutt in an xterm (or eterm or whatever) that
understands UTF-8 and thus read UTF-8 e-mail that contains a wacky
mixture of UTF-8-encoded characters? If so, is there a HOWTO that
explains what to do?
(2) I received e-mail which had UTF-8 in the headers, like this:
Fr
For some reason I can't seem to pin down, mutt doesn't want to use gnupg
anymore. It detects it when I run ./configure, but when reading signed
messages, it shows the signature as an attachment
[-- Attachment #2 --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Encoding: 7bit, Size: 0.2K --]
[--
When I construct a score pattern using ~f, it appears to behave differently
from in other contexts. Specifically, the expression seems to be matched
only against the email address, not the name. Eg, if this message is From:
Andrew Pimlott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, an ordinary search for
either "~f pi
hi,
Is here way to set search-opposite with prompting for regexp ?
--
Keso
be smart,
don't be retard!
16 matches
Mail list logo