On Thu, Dec 30, 1999 at 07:37:09PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
As I understand it, a PGP signature is not an encryption of the message,
but an encryption of an MD5 (or SHA) *digest* of the message. This is
like a checksum, though much more sophisticated, but it is always the
same size.
On Thu, Dec 30, 1999 at 03:17:03AM -0800, Christopher Smith wrote:
Given what would appear to be the relative simplicity of adding this
feature, I'm wondering if anyone can think of a reason why it
shouldn't be there?
Previously, we were pretty strict in stating that we would not add features
On 1999-12-31 00:27:44 -0800, Michael Elkins wrote:
If someone wanted to do this, what I would suggest is making an
user controlled option to search text/plain messages for the
magic string "-BEGIN PGP".
I suggest the variable
set i_really_want_to_slow_down_reading_my_mailboxes
I have three entries in my .muttrc file for mail lists.
lists [EMAIL PROTECTED]
lists [EMAIL PROTECTED]
lists [EMAIL PROTECTED]
When I go to reply to the mdlug list it ask me if I want to reply to
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ( what I want ) then I can
say no if I want to go to the person who sent it.
Michael Connolly [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
I have three entries in my .muttrc file for mail lists.
lists [EMAIL PROTECTED]
lists [EMAIL PROTECTED]
lists [EMAIL PROTECTED]
When I go to reply to the mdlug list it ask me if I want to reply to
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ( what I want ) then I can
Could someone mail me the gpg-2comp program? The site mentioned in the gpg.rc
file is unreachable for me.
If it possible put it into the contrib/ area.
Thanks
Attila
--
---
- Debian 2.1 Linux / 2.2.13 / qmail -
- Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]-
on Fri, Dec 31, 1999 at 07:37:44AM -0600, J = "Jeremy Blosser" asserted:
J Roland Rosenfeld [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
J Open your eyes, there are normal users out there, which don't want or
J aren't allowed/able to use procmail and which communicate with Windows
nobody here can help those
I'm wondering, how one could set the "Return-Path:" header field properly
using options available in muttrc. Consider the following:
I'm using corporate network, which has it's own name service, not
registered anywhere in Internet - let's say it's "office.domain". I'm
connecting to the
Oh, I forgot: I think, the reason of the problem is, that I couldn't
persuade mutt to use other SMTP server (the "registered" one), instead of
the local sendmail, working on my personal machine. How to do that?
pozdrawiam / regards
On Fri, 31 Dec 1999, Shannon Lee wrote:
J Open your eyes, there are normal users out there, which don't
J want or aren't allowed/able to use procmail and which
J communicate with Windows
nobody here can help those organizations or individuals who have
chosen to limit themselves to
On Fri, Dec 31, 1999 at 09:22:12PM +0100, Zbigniew Baniewski wrote:
I'm wondering, how one could set the "Return-Path:" header field properly
using options available in muttrc. Consider the following:
Well, you can set sendmail='/usr/lib/sendmail -f someaddress', or you can
use the new patch
Reply-To:
Hi.
The Mutt manual notes that a sample mime.types file is included with the Mutt
distriburtion, but I cannot find it. (Red Hat 6.1). I find a Pine sample mime.types
file, one for Apache in /etc, but none for Mutt. Any suggestions on where else to
look? Thanks.
John
Hi guys,
There was mentioned sometime ago about procmail mailing list.
May somebody post the URL again.
Happy Y2K!
--
Paulius Danielius
Student of Vilnius University
Department of Mathematics and Informatics
LITHUANIA
On Fri, Dec 31, 1999 at 09:34:34PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, I forgot: I think, the reason of the problem is, that I couldn't
persuade mutt to use other SMTP server (the "registered" one), instead of
the local sendmail, working on my personal machine. How to do that?
Paulius Danielius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Paulius Danielius [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: procmail mailing list URL?
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 01:40:39 +0200
Interesting date header... you have jumped very far in the future!
--
David DeSimone | "The doctrine of
On Fri, Dec 31, 1999 at 07:04:01PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
Paulius Danielius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Paulius Danielius [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: procmail mailing list URL?
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 01:40:39 +0200
Interesting date header... you have
16 matches
Mail list logo