* Gary Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000316 08:31]:
I have one signature file for "internal" e-mail and another for
"external" e-mail. Here's what I put in my muttrc file to select the
appropriate signature as a function of the addresses's domain:
Thanks :)
send-hook . 'set
Thomas writes:
| However, you may wish to notice that there is still a
| problem with message flags. From the mh point of view (as
| far as I understand it), these flags should be stored in
| the .mh_sequences file - which is in paricular true for
| the unseen sequence. However, there doesn't
On 2000-03-15 15:25:56 -0500,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, mh has a problem with that. The simple solution
is just to avoid any form of concurrent access to
folders. If you only use mh commands from the shell
(i.e. no rcvstore), that's the case. Mutt can't be
faulted by mh users for
Is there a certain color setting i need to use to that when vim starts
up to edit a message, i don't get a huge glob of white at the bottom
of the screen?
jm
--
-
Jonathon McKitrick / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Tears from the depth of some divine despair
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 10:10:40PM -0600, Jason Helfman wrote:
wanting to try the gnu pgp, what srpms would i need to download, being
in the us.
GnuPG doesn't contain any restricted algorithms, feel free to download
the version you prefer. The externally available module for rsa
is not for
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 10:10:40PM -0600, Jason Helfman wrote:
gnupg-rsaref-1.0-2.src.rpm
Take this when your are in the US.
Yeah, i downloaded all of the gnupg* srpms last night and checked out
the description of them this morning, so what I found from these
actions are now confirmed here
Aside from the liscencing of gnupg, why does it seem preferred over
pgp? I love the command line, however is their a gui
On 03/16 09:32 -0600, Jason Helfman wrote:
Yeah, i downloaded all of the gnupg* srpms last night and checked out
the description of them this morning, so what I found from these
actions are now confirmed here
Aside from the liscencing of gnupg, why does it seem preferred over
pgp? I
2000-03-16-11:08:54 Laurent Marsan:
maybe it's a stupid question asked hundred times already, but
it would really help if you can tell me how hiding the names of
all the people I send a mail, to avoid someone of them answering
everybody.
The feature you're talking about is called blind
At 20:22 +0200 16 Mar 2000, Mikko Hänninen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can't match in a send-hook the From address (that I know of),
Yes, you can.
- the "original message match" pattern operator, as proposed by someone
(I forget who) -- better than having "reply-hooks", with these it would
Hi,
has anybody looked into using grepmail from within
mutt? I was thinking of some macro/script that reads
parameters, queries grepmail and presents the results
in a temporarily created mailbox afterwards? If nobody
tried, I will.
Regards,
Chris
--
christian molls
student of laws
There is a feature in trn which I like quite a bit, which
is when I am done reading a thread it pops me back out
to the index, instead of the next message. I am finding,
with my settings, that this doesn't happen in mutt.
I find it useful on mailing lists where I can tell
from the subject if I
Aaron Schrab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 16 Mar 2000:
At 20:22 +0200 16 Mar 2000, Mikko Hänninen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can't match in a send-hook the From address (that I know of),
Yes, you can.
Really? Cool. :-) What happens if you use my_hdr From: with a
send-hook which
I have the lastest gnupg source rpm and others...
gnupg-1.0.0-1
gnupg-rsaref-1.0-2
I have some preferrences from a fellow mutter...
but I get all these errors...these are some.
Error in /home/deklown/.mutt/mutt.pgp, line 3: pgp_decode_command:
unknown variable
Error in
Bennett Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
maybe it's a stupid question asked hundred times already, but
it would really help if you can tell me how hiding the names of
all the people I send a mail, to avoid someone of them answering
everybody.
The feature you're talking about is called blind
2000-03-16-12:20:58 Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS:
I have been told that this is in fact a common abuse of Bcc.
Apparently it is guarranteed that recipients in the To and Cc
fields will not receive the Bcc field, but it is not guarranteed
that recipients in the Bcc field will not receive the Bcc
I'm experiencing an odd intermittent problem. It happens sometimes when
I'm going through incoming mailboxes. After finishing in one mailbox, I
might cycle through a couple with spacebar then select one with enter.
At this point Mutt doesn't respond to any kepress for about 30 seconds.
Then it
On 2000-03-16 17:20:58 +, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
Apparently it is guarranteed that recipients in the To
and Cc fields will not receive the Bcc field, but it is
not guarranteed that recipients in the Bcc field will
not receive the Bcc field.
This is a non-issue nowadays: You can
Terje Elde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 16 Mar 2000:
The problem is that what I need is more or less to enable the send-hook
matching only if I'm in a spesific folder, or writing a email from a
spesific address.
Well, you have two different situations here:
You can't match in a send-hook
On 2000-03-16 12:39:25 -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
But there is no code to do this in Mutt currently.
This is not true. Try using the bcc header, and set
nowrite_bcc.
--
http://www.guug.de/~roessler/
20 matches
Mail list logo
