I keep getting bounced off of lists, just checking
Since I switched from PGP to GPG mutt works as advertised
with GPG/PGP except, I only can use new headers (MIME multi-
part), which my friends in the land of Windoz can not deal
with. I can't get it to send old inline for them. I tried
"set pgp_create_traditional = ask-no" but responding yes to
Hello all,
is there a way to quickly mark all messages in a mail folder (similar to
do a catch up in a newsreader) ?
regards,
Stefan
Hi.
On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 07:47:58PM +0100, Stefan Schwandter wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> is there a way to quickly mark all messages in a mail folder (similar to
> do a catch up in a newsreader) ?
Yes, of course. Tag all messages (T .*), and then remove N flag from all
of them (W N). Here's macr
On 2001.03.18, in <20010318211124.A574@madmachine>,
"phaust" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 07:47:58PM +0100, Stefan Schwandter wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > is there a way to quickly mark all messages in a mail folder (similar to
> > do a catch up in a news
Hi.
On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 09:11:24PM +0100, phaust wrote:
> macro .c "T.*\nWN" "Cath up"
Oops, it's not what-i've-meant :> Better try this:
macro index .c "T.*\n;WN" "Cath up"
Best regards,
--
+[: phaust (at) users.sourceforge.net :]+---+[: http://www.phaust.z.pl/ :]+
+[: the slPIM project
* Stefan Schwandter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010318 20:35]:
> is there a way to quickly mark all messages in a mail folder (similar to
> do a catch up in a newsreader) ?
Try adding a macro like that in your $HOME/.muttrc:
macro index \ec "T.*\n;WN;WO^T.*\n" "catch up"
This should cle
On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 04:13:12PM -0600, David Champion wrote:
> > macro .c "T.*\nWN" "Cath up"
>
> Just a small tip: in a large mailbox, tagging "~A" is noticeably faster
> than "." or ".*". The latter performs a regular expression match
> against all messages, while the former just selects e
On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 11:16:22PM +0100, phaust wrote:
> > macro .c "T.*\nWN" "Cath up"
>
> Oops, it's not what-i've-meant :> Better try this:
>
> macro index .c "T.*\n;WN" "Cath up"
I figured it out, thanks :-)
regards,
Stefan
On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 07:47:58PM +0100, Stefan Schwandter wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> is there a way to quickly mark all messages in a mail folder (similar to
> do a catch up in a newsreader) ?
T.;^R
That is:
T. Tag all messages matching '.' (means all of them)
;^R Mark all tagg
I just upgraded to KDE2.1. I run Mutt within a Konsole version 1.0.1.
It's default keyboard mapping has apparently changed with the upgrade,
now defaulting to "xterm (XFree 4.x.x)" This mapping does not work
correctly in Mutt. Specifically, the backspace, home and end key do not
work. (They sh
Whouldn't the problem lie with how your editor handles the various terminals?
tw
Le jour Sun Mar 18, 2001 at 05:49:30PM +, John P. Verel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) a
ecrit...
> I just upgraded to KDE2.1. I run Mutt within a Konsole version 1.0.1.
> It's default keyboard mapping has apparently
On 03/18/01, 06:11:30PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Whouldn't the problem lie with how your editor handles the various terminals?
>
> tw
I wouldn't' think so. Konsole under KDE 2.0 worked just fine with
default settings. As noted, mutt works fine with other terminals and
with what would a
On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 16:13:12 -0600, David Champion wrote:
> Just a small tip: in a large mailbox, tagging "~A" is noticeably faster
> than "."
No, it is not. There are equal fast because of a little hack in the
code (in the function mutt_check_simple in pattern.c) which checks
for "." and con
I was just curious what new features are being developed for future
release(s) of mutt.
Thanks.
-Ken
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]AIM: ScopusFest
I have two questions:
1) Is there anyway to sort the headers so they display in a certain order in
mutt? If not, can you suggest a way to do this (using exim maybe, or
procmail)?
2) Anyone out there using mutt with a local maildir as opposed to mbox? Any
comments on advantages or just things y
Tom von Schwerdtner proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> 1) Is there anyway to sort the headers so they display in a certain order in
> mutt? If not, can you suggest a way to do this (using exim maybe, or
> procmail)?
# Specify the order of the headers to appear when displaying a message
# h
17 matches
Mail list logo