Morten, et al --
...and then Morten Liebach said...
% Yo!
Hi!
%
% I'm trying to communicate encrypted with an Outlook user using PGP 7.0,
% and I'm using mutt 1.3.21i and GnuPG-1.0.6.
Ah, the things we do to work with the business world... :-)
%
% I think I saw a way to encrypt with gpg a
Yo!
I'm trying to communicate encrypted with an Outlook user using PGP 7.0,
and I'm using mutt 1.3.21i and GnuPG-1.0.6.
I think I saw a way to encrypt with gpg and mutt so that Outlook users
don't get it as an attachment, but I can't find it again?
When I get an encrypted email I have to pipe t
Hi,
Sorry if this has been asked before, but is there a way to "tag" or somehow
get mutt to alias multiple addresses in an email (a la Pine).
Specifically, mutt only looks to the From: address. Can it also allow
selections from the Cc: field or body of the email?
Thanks,
Art
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 10:20:36PM -0700, Denis Perelyubskiy wrote:
> the problem with outlook is that it also sends a plain text
> copy along with html one. so i DO NOT WANT to start any kind
> of browser, dump some output, then look at it in my pager if
> i can somehow train mutt to recognize th
* David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-Wed-01 22:31 -0700]:
>
>On 2001.09.06, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Denis Perelyubskiy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> the problem with outlook is that it also sends a plain text
>> copy along with html one. so i DO NOT WANT to start any kind
On 2001.09.06, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Denis Perelyubskiy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> the problem with outlook is that it also sends a plain text
> copy along with html one. so i DO NOT WANT to start any kind
> of browser, dump some output, then look at it in my pager if
> i can some
* Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-Wed-01 22:15 -0700]:
>
>Denis Perelyubskiy wrote:
>> is there a way to tell mutt in which order to process
>> attachments. in particular, i get lots of mail sent by
>> people who use outlook. that thing sends out 2 copies of the
>> message : plain text
Denis Perelyubskiy wrote:
> is there a way to tell mutt in which order to process
> attachments. in particular, i get lots of mail sent by
> people who use outlook. that thing sends out 2 copies of the
> message : plain text and html.
> looks like this
sure.
i do it like this:
# view annoying h
Hey all,
I'm using mutt 1.2.5i, and I've got a very strange problem with new
mail. I'm using mutt to access IMAP folders, and the binary and
shared data reside on NFS. Here's the problem:
On some systems where I run mutt, it works as you would expect. On
others, after I read all the new messa
hello,
is there a way to tell mutt in which order to process
attachments. in particular, i get lots of mail sent by
people who use outlook. that thing sends out 2 copies of the
message : plain text and html. in fact, the attachment menu
looks like this:
I 1[multipa/alternativ, 7bit, 2.9K
See $alternates.
On 2001-09-05 21:57:25 +0200, Volker Moell wrote:
>Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 21:57:25 +0200
>From: Volker Moell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: ML mutt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: To Me, Myself and I
>Mail-Followup-To: ML mutt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i
>Organization:
Hi, there!
When using the "set from='[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" every mail from this address to
another person is displayed in the index with "To ...".
But I use several e-mail addresses (and I have some more, older ones).
Is it possible to specify *multiple* e-mail addresses (or better a
RegExp) which
Justin R. Miller wrote:
> I think that he means that the mail message is marked as 'N' in the
> sent folder, regardless of whether it's in your mailboxes list. I
> believe thist went away with one of the more recent 1.3.x releases, as
> I used to see it, but it's gone now.
it doesn't seem to a
Thus spake Vineet Kumar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> You don't want mutt to let you know of new mail in sent-mail? don't
> include it in your mailboxes line.
I think that he means that the mail message is marked as 'N' in the sent
folder, regardless of whether it's in your mailboxes list. I believe
t
Vineet Kumar wrote:
> This command specifies folders which can receive mail and which will
> be checked for new messages. By default, the main menu status bar
> displays how many of these folders have new messages.
> You don't want mutt to let you know of new mail in sent-mail? don't
> in
* Will Yardley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010905 03:12]:
> my actual question is that whenever i send a message, using either
> fcc-hook or set record (currently using fcc-hook):
>
> #set record =~/mail/sent-mail
> fcc-hook $ +sent-mail
>
> i get a new mail message in sent-mail.
>
> i do have sent-ma
Hi,
I am preparing to get back to Linux (unfortunately, I have been
stacked for some at Windows notebook, but I am to return back to
Linux soon; wov!) and I have decided to implement an option of
Outlook that I miss in mutt (actually, probably the only option
I miss :-). It was so easy to arc
On Wednesday, Sep 05, 2001, Christoph Maurer wrote:
> Is there a way to execute a command when opening a mailbox?
> E.g. I want to tag all messages older than one week when opening my
> mailbox "inbox".
>
> I tried
> folder-hook inbox "exec T ~d>1w" and
> folder-hook inbox exec tag-pattern ~d>1
Hello, Mutt-Experts!
Is there a way to execute a command when opening a mailbox?
E.g. I want to tag all messages older than one week when opening my
mailbox "inbox".
I tried
folder-hook inbox "exec T ~d>1w" and
folder-hook inbox exec tag-pattern ~d>1w"
but bothg did not work
Thanx
Christoph
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [05/09/01 11:28 -0400]:
> On Wednesday, 05 September 2001 at 17:04, Matteo Vaccari wrote:
> > I have no problems accessing my provider's IMAP server through Mutt. What
> > I'd like is for Mutt to use my provider's SMTP server as well, instead of
> > using sendmail on localhos
On Wednesday, 05 September 2001 at 17:04, Matteo Vaccari wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have no problems accessing my provider's IMAP server through Mutt. What
> I'd like is for Mutt to use my provider's SMTP server as well, instead of
> using sendmail on localhost. Is there something I have overlooked?
Lars Hecking wrote:
> > configure:6558: checking for iconv
> > configure:6576: gcc -o conftest -Wall -pedantic -g -O2 -I/home/will//include
>-I/home/will/include -L/home/will//lib -L/home/will/lib conftest.c 1>&5
> > /tmp/cca149331.o: In function `main':
> > /home/will/mutt-1.3.22.1/configu
> configure:6558: checking for iconv
> configure:6576: gcc -o conftest -Wall -pedantic -g -O2 -I/home/will//include
>-I/home/will/include -L/home/will//lib -L/home/will/lib conftest.c 1>&5
> /tmp/cca149331.o: In function `main':
> /home/will/mutt-1.3.22.1/configure:6570: undefined reference
Lars Hecking wrote:
> > checking whether this iconv is good enough... no
> > configure: error: Try using libiconv instead
> Strange - everything else looks correct.
> We'll need the relevant parts of your config.log, too.
ok. i'll include what seems to be relevant in an attached text fi
> checking whether this iconv is good enough... no
> configure: error: Try using libiconv instead
Strange - everything else looks correct.
We'll need the relevant parts of your config.log, too.
Lars Hecking wrote:
> Well, if you don't show us how exactly 1.3.22.1i fails to compile,
> we're unable to help ...
(as you can see it's a crusty old machine)
epia% uname -a
Linux sepia.propagation.net 2.0.36 #5 Wed Dec 16 18:09:02 CST 1998 i686
unknown
sepia% ./configure --prefix=/home/w
> so my problem with 1.2.5 is the save-hook thing (which may have a very
> simple answer for all i know), but i would like to be able to compile
> 1.3.x just for cheap thrills.
Well, if you don't show us how exactly 1.3.22.1i fails to compile,
we're unable to help ...
Lars Hecking wrote:
> mutt 1.2.x doesn't use iconv.
sorry - i should have been more specific. i would assume that the fact
that mutt 1.2.5 doesn't use iconv is why it compiles fine. my problem
is compiling 1.3.x - this was referring to my afforementioned troubles
compiling 1.3.x
so my problem
Will Yardley writes:
> i just compiled mutt 1.2.5 in my home directory on a shell account on a
> machine for which i don't have root access (later versions aren't happy
> compiling for some reason, but 1.2.5 worked ok).
>
> a couple questions; i installed libiconv 1.7 in my home dir and pointed
>
i just compiled mutt 1.2.5 in my home directory on a shell account on a
machine for which i don't have root access (later versions aren't happy
compiling for some reason, but 1.2.5 worked ok).
a couple questions; i installed libiconv 1.7 in my home dir and pointed
--with-libiconv to my lib direct
Kai Blin wrote:
> I compiled mutt-1.3.21 with imap and ssl support, not touching the nls
> setting. My LANG is set C and my LC_CTYPE is de_DE. Still, my umlauts show a
> question mark.
>
> What did I miss?
Try to compile with one or both of the ./configure switches
--enable-locales-fix and --wit
Hi, list
This _is_ getting a FAQ, I know, but I tried all I remembered with this
problem.
I compiled mutt-1.3.21 with imap and ssl support, not touching the nls
setting. My LANG is set C and my LC_CTYPE is de_DE. Still, my umlauts show a
question mark.
What did I miss?
Thanks for the help,
Ka
32 matches
Mail list logo
