Re: pgp_create_traditional or not?

2002-08-04 Thread Jussi Ekholm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alain Bench [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Saturday, August 3, 2002 at 4:43:48 PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; x-action=pgp-signed I wonder why Mutt changes charset from ISO-8859-1 to UTF-8. Is this a known

Mutt 1.4i folder.index and folder.index.ids files ?

2002-08-04 Thread Paul A. Cheshire
Having recently upgraded to 1.4i I noticed it has a set of the above files for each folder (Maildir). Unfortunately, this seems to have had a performance hit, especially on folders that contain a large number of items. Whereas before it took about 7 minutes to open a folder with 50 000 items it

Re: Mutt 1.4i folder.index and folder.index.ids files ?

2002-08-04 Thread Bruno Postle
On Sun 04-Aug-2002 at 01:28:05 +0100, Paul A. Cheshire wrote: Having recently upgraded to 1.4i I noticed it has a set of the above files for each folder (Maildir). Oh, where did you get that mutt? mutt doesn't generate reverse-index files and I'm not aware of any patches that do this (it

mv /var/mail/hans mbox safely, visual bell

2002-08-04 Thread Hans Ginzel
Hello, how can I move in a script mail from the spoolfile to mbox safely (with locking)? How can I set in mutt to do visal bell instaed of audible? Thanks -- Hans Ginzel

Re: option description - always give default value

2002-08-04 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Sun, Aug 04, 2002 at 04:22:03AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote: * Cameron Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-04 01:02]: On my systems I frequently have several mutts installed. Each has its own manual page because each has its own install tree. The /usr/local/bin/mutt is a symlink to the

BUG - wrapping lines in muttrc

2002-08-04 Thread Andy Saxena
Hi, I think I may have found a possible bug in the way .muttrc is parsed. I ran into this while setting up a folder-hook option. If \ is the last character on a line that's commented out, mutt seems to read the line instead of ignoring it. Here are my test cases: Test Case 1 -

Re: mv /var/mail/hans mbox safely, visual bell

2002-08-04 Thread Sven Guckes
* Hans Ginzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-04 14:43]: how can I move in a script mail from the spoolfile to mbox safely (with locking)? script as in does not use mutt at all? dunno. How can I set in mutt to do visal bell instaed of audible? unset beep unset beep_new however, visual bell

Re: BUG - wrapping lines in muttrc

2002-08-04 Thread Andre Berger
--gj572EiMnwbLXET9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * Andy Saxena [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2002-08-04 13:40 -0400: Hi, =20 I think I may have found a possible bug in the way .muttrc is parsed. I ran into this while

Re: Mutt 1.4i folder.index and folder.index.ids files ?

2002-08-04 Thread Paul A. Cheshire
Bruno Postle [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] asserted: On Sun 04-Aug-2002 at 01:28:05 +0100, Paul A. Cheshire wrote: Having recently upgraded to 1.4i I noticed it has a set of the above files for each folder (Maildir). Oh, where did you get that mutt? mutt doesn't generate reverse-index files

Re: Automatic save-hooks?

2002-08-04 Thread David Champion
* On 2002.08.03, in [EMAIL PROTECTED], * Chris Stork [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Problem: I handed out loads of addresses of the form [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'd like to automatically save emails to this address to =SENDERSPECIFIC, where automatically means that I don't want to put a save-hook

Re: pgp_create_traditional or not?

2002-08-04 Thread David T-G
Jussi, et al -- I don't have a lot to suggest, but a couple of things pop to mind... ...and then Jussi Ekholm said... % % Alain Bench [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: % On Saturday, August 3, 2002 at 4:43:48 PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote: % % Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8;

Re: BUG - wrapping lines in muttrc

2002-08-04 Thread Bruno Postle
On Sun 04-Aug-2002 at 01:39:21 -0400, Andy Saxena wrote: I think I may have found a possible bug in the way .muttrc is parsed. I ran into this while setting up a folder-hook option. If \ is the last character on a line that's commented out, mutt seems to read the line instead of ignoring

Re: exceptional people

2002-08-04 Thread Sven Guckes
* On Sun, Aug 04, 2002 at 04:22:03AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote: Users like history majors and non-cs minors never edit their PATH because they no freakin' clue about this. * Thomas E. Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-04 15:52]: that's too broad a generalization. Last week I was having a

Re: antispam addresses on mailing lists?

2002-08-04 Thread Sven Guckes
* Paul A. Cheshire [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-04 17:46]: From: Paul A. Cheshire [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] i've seen a lot of those antispam addresses on Usenet - but on *mailing* lists? sheesh! Sven [editing procmailrc]

Re: exceptional people

2002-08-04 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Sun, Aug 04, 2002 at 08:00:07PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote: * On Sun, Aug 04, 2002 at 04:22:03AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote: Users like history majors and non-cs minors never edit their PATH because they no freakin' clue about this. * Thomas E. Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-04 15:52]:

Re: pgp_create_traditional or not?

2002-08-04 Thread Alain Bench
On Sunday, August 4, 2002 at 2:06:19 PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote: Would it be possibly catastrophous, if I'd modify $send_charset so, that it would only send mails with character sets of 'ISO-8859-1'? Any insight? Last time someone tried, some of his mails were labeled with