-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alain Bench [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday, August 3, 2002 at 4:43:48 PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; x-action=pgp-signed
I wonder why Mutt changes charset from ISO-8859-1 to UTF-8. Is this a
known
Having recently upgraded to 1.4i I noticed it has a set of the above files for
each folder (Maildir).
Unfortunately, this seems to have had a performance hit, especially on folders
that contain a large number of items. Whereas before it took about 7 minutes
to open a folder with 50 000 items it
On Sun 04-Aug-2002 at 01:28:05 +0100, Paul A. Cheshire wrote:
Having recently upgraded to 1.4i I noticed it has a set of the above
files for each folder (Maildir).
Oh, where did you get that mutt?
mutt doesn't generate reverse-index files and I'm not aware of any
patches that do this (it
Hello,
how can I move in a script mail from the spoolfile to
mbox safely (with locking)?
How can I set in mutt to do visal bell instaed of audible?
Thanks
--
Hans Ginzel
On Sun, Aug 04, 2002 at 04:22:03AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
* Cameron Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-04 01:02]:
On my systems I frequently have several mutts installed.
Each has its own manual page because each has its own install tree.
The /usr/local/bin/mutt is a symlink to the
Hi,
I think I may have found a possible bug in the way .muttrc is parsed. I
ran into this while setting up a folder-hook option.
If \ is the last character on a line that's commented out, mutt seems to
read the line instead of ignoring it.
Here are my test cases:
Test Case 1 -
* Hans Ginzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-04 14:43]:
how can I move in a script mail from the
spoolfile to mbox safely (with locking)?
script as in does not use mutt at all? dunno.
How can I set in mutt to do visal bell instaed of audible?
unset beep
unset beep_new
however, visual bell
--gj572EiMnwbLXET9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
* Andy Saxena [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2002-08-04 13:40 -0400:
Hi,
=20
I think I may have found a possible bug in the way .muttrc is parsed. I
ran into this while
Bruno Postle [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] asserted:
On Sun 04-Aug-2002 at 01:28:05 +0100, Paul A. Cheshire wrote:
Having recently upgraded to 1.4i I noticed it has a set of the above
files for each folder (Maildir).
Oh, where did you get that mutt?
mutt doesn't generate reverse-index files
* On 2002.08.03, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
* Chris Stork [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Problem: I handed out loads of addresses of the form
[EMAIL PROTECTED] I'd like to automatically save
emails to this address to =SENDERSPECIFIC, where automatically means
that I don't want to put a save-hook
Jussi, et al --
I don't have a lot to suggest, but a couple of things pop to mind...
...and then Jussi Ekholm said...
%
% Alain Bench [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
% On Saturday, August 3, 2002 at 4:43:48 PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
%
% Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8;
On Sun 04-Aug-2002 at 01:39:21 -0400, Andy Saxena wrote:
I think I may have found a possible bug in the way .muttrc is parsed.
I ran into this while setting up a folder-hook option.
If \ is the last character on a line that's commented out, mutt seems
to read the line instead of ignoring
* On Sun, Aug 04, 2002 at 04:22:03AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
Users like history majors and non-cs minors never edit
their PATH because they no freakin' clue about this.
* Thomas E. Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-04 15:52]:
that's too broad a generalization. Last week I was having a
* Paul A. Cheshire [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-04 17:46]:
From: Paul A. Cheshire [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i've seen a lot of those antispam addresses on Usenet -
but on *mailing* lists? sheesh!
Sven [editing procmailrc]
On Sun, Aug 04, 2002 at 08:00:07PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
* On Sun, Aug 04, 2002 at 04:22:03AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
Users like history majors and non-cs minors never edit
their PATH because they no freakin' clue about this.
* Thomas E. Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-04 15:52]:
On Sunday, August 4, 2002 at 2:06:19 PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
Would it be possibly catastrophous, if I'd modify $send_charset so,
that it would only send mails with character sets of 'ISO-8859-1'? Any
insight?
Last time someone tried, some of his mails were labeled with
16 matches
Mail list logo