Dear Mutt users,
is there an easy way to attach multiple files to a message, from the
commandline, using a wildcard? I start mutt from the commandline a
lot, like so
mutt -a weekly_report.txt peter
which works fine. I'd also like to do the following:
mutt -a *.png peter
however that doesn't
Re: Hein Zelle 2007-03-20 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> which gets cumbersome with 20+ files. There's a good alternative
> (attaching files from within mutt), but I was wondering if anyone has
> solved this before. Any clever shell scripts to add the -a option for
> each of the filenames?
for f in *.png
FWIW, if somebody can come up with a decent command line interface
for attachig multiple files, that would be a rather valuable
contribution.
--
Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 2007-03-20 13:33:34 +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
> From: Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: mutt-use
Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FWIW, if somebody can come up with a decent command line interface
> for attachig multiple files, that would be a rather valuable
> contribution.
-j 'glob_pattern'
Mutt automatically attaches any file in the CWD that matches the glob, i.e.
mutt -j
Re: Charles Cazabon 2007-03-20 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Mutt automatically attaches any file in the CWD that matches the glob, i.e.
>
> mutt -j '*.png' ...
Or make that -a, stat() the file first, and if not there, try to
expand the pattern.
Christoph
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/
Hi,
* Christoph Berg [07-03-20 15:10:32 +0100] wrote:
Re: Charles Cazabon 2007-03-20 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mutt automatically attaches any file in the CWD that matches the glob, i.e.
mutt -j '*.png' ...
Or make that -a, stat() the file first, and if not there, try to
expand the pattern.
On 2007-03-20 14:32:05 +, Rocco Rutte wrote:
> Does getopt() prevent us from allowing any number of additional
> arguments for -j? If you ask me, globbing is a shell's
> reposibility.
agree
--
Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, March 20 at 03:33 PM, quoth Thomas Roessler:
> On 2007-03-20 14:32:05 +, Rocco Rutte wrote:
>> Does getopt() prevent us from allowing any number of additional
>> arguments for -j? If you ask me, globbing is a shell's
>> reposibility.
On 2007-03-20, Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 20 at 03:33 PM, quoth Thomas Roessler:
> > On 2007-03-20 14:32:05 +, Rocco Rutte wrote:
> >> Does getopt() prevent us from allowing any number of additional
> >> arguments for -j? If you ask me, globbing is a shell's
>
Hi all, I am a mutt user trying to happily co-exist in an Exchange
environment. For the most part all is well. I wrote a small Python program
to act as my query_command to look up addresses via AD (LDAP) so I could have
access to the company address book. The problem is that Distribution Groups
Frankly, the right solution is to make this distribution group
addressable through SMTP.
--
Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 2007-03-20 16:53:36 -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> From: Ray Van Dolson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: mutt-users@mutt.org
> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 16:53:36 -0700
>
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 12:57:28AM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> Frankly, the right solution is to make this distribution group
> addressable through SMTP.
Agreed. There are some hoops to jump through however in order to make this
happen in the meantime ... :)
Ray
12 matches
Mail list logo
