* On 2007.05.11, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Charles Cazabon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In my experience, most people find configuring and using getmail easier. I
I actually found fetchmail much easier to configure than getmail, but
that's partly because I began using fetchmail many y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, May 12 at 04:44 PM, quoth Roland Hill:
> Mostly Eterm when at home and KDE's konsole (not gnome). This has
> settings of:
>
> $TERM = linux
> Keytab = XTerm (XFree 4.x.x)
For Eterm, you probably want to use TERM=xterm, and for konsole,
On Fri, 11 May 2007 or thereabouts, Kyle Wheeler came forth with:
> >> What terminal?
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ echo $TERM
> >xterm
> Heh, not quite the answer he was looking for. That's what terminal
> emulation mode your applications are using; he asked for what terminal
> you're ACTUALLY using
slakmagik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2007-05-11 (Fri) 19:51:38 [-0300], Cleverson wrote:
> >
> > I'd like opinions on which of these fetch-mails programs is better and/or
> > have less bugs: Fetchmail or Getmail?
I say getmail, but I'm biased, as I'm its author.
> FWIW, here's what Patrick
The best combination for me is:
fetchmail,procmail,mutt,esmtp
I don't plan to change the match for they are working pretty well with my
unbuntu-6.06 so far, in fact I've heard that getmail is a nice alternative
option for fetchmail cos it's more bug-proof though.
cheers
--
Alex Yan
2007-05-12
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, May 12 at 02:37 PM, quoth Roland Hill:
>> What system do you run?
>Kubuntu, 7.04, Feisty Fawn.
>
>> Which libc version?
>libc6, 2.5-0ubuntu14
So far, nothing too unusual...
>> What terminal?
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ echo $TERM
>xterm
Heh,
On Fri, 11 May 2007 or thereabouts, Alain Bench came forth with:
> Thanks: Both mails are well formed, and are displayed perfectly
> here. This definitely designates the locale as suspect.
> What system do you run?
Kubuntu, 7.04, Feisty Fawn.
> Which libc version?
libc6, 2.5-0ubuntu14
> What te
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, May 11 at 07:51 PM, quoth Cleverson:
> And about filtering and sending mail to specific mailboxes, do I
> choose Procmail or Maildrop?
I use procmail as a major component of my largest server, and it
usually works well. I like it's syntax
On 2007-05-11 (Fri) 19:51:38 [-0300], Cleverson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like opinions on which of these fetch-mails programs is better and/or
> have less bugs: Fetchmail or Getmail?
>
> And about filtering and sending mail to specific mailboxes, do I choose
> Procmail or Maildrop?
>
> I intend to
* Cleverson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [05-11-07 18:52]:
> I'd like opinions on which of these fetch-mails programs is better
> and/or have less bugs: Fetchmail or Getmail?
>
> And about filtering and sending mail to specific mailboxes, do I
> choose Procmail or Maildrop?
I am very happy with postfix, f
Hi,
I'd like opinions on which of these fetch-mails programs is better and/or
have less bugs: Fetchmail or Getmail?
And about filtering and sending mail to specific mailboxes, do I choose
Procmail or Maildrop?
I intend to get those programs to work in conjunction with Mutt. If there
are al
As a fairly new Mutt user I have been feeling my way as regards
configuration but today I got overconfident.
Exploring ways of filtering out unwanted threads I came across scoring.
Set up scores for various subjects and set score_threshold_delete to 100
Restarted mutt, read mail, changed folder, h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, May 11 at 10:54 PM, quoth Salve H�kedal:
>This is my (very simple) muttrc:
>
>set mbox_type=maildir
>set folder="~/epost"
>set spoolfile="+innboks"
>set mbox="+innboks"
>set postponed="+kladd"
>setrecord="+sendt"
># (Without this I
I try to write a simple muttrc but I'm a little confused.
This is my locale:
LANG=nb_NO
LC_CTYPE="nb_NO"
LC_NUMERIC="nb_NO"
LC_TIME="nb_NO"
LC_COLLATE="nb_NO"
LC_MONETARY="nb_NO"
LC_MESSAGES="nb_NO"
LC_PAPER="nb_NO"
LC_NAME="nb_NO"
LC_ADDRESS="nb_NO"
LC_TELEPHONE="nb_NO"
LC_MEASUREMENT="nb_NO"
LC_
On Friday, May 11, 2007 at 9:07:12 +1200, Roland Hill wrote:
> attached as requested. 1 'bad' message in Latin-1 and 1 in utf-8.
Thanks: Both mails are well formed, and are displayed perfectly
here. This definitely designates the locale as suspect.
What system do you run? Which libc ver
unsubscribe
Hello Trey,
* Quoting Trey Sizemore [00:44 Thu 10 May]:
> Thanks. Does anyone happen to know what the correct syntax is in
> url_handler.sh to get the URL's opened in new tabs in Firefox? I've
> gotten as close as getting the first URL to open, but selecting a
> second results in:
>
> Error: F
17 matches
Mail list logo