Re: Mutt Quick Reference v.1.03 (addition from Markus Miedaner)

2007-10-23 Thread Michael Tatge
* On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 Przemyslaw Gawronski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: [vi cofee mug] > Any shot of that one to take a look? :) http://www.cafepress.com/geekcheat.11507711 (I'm not associated with that company in any way.) Michael -- Your computer account is overdrawn. Please reauthorize.

Re: Mutt Quick Reference v.1.03 (addition from Markus Miedaner)

2007-10-23 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Wednesday, October 24, 2007 a las 08:27:50AM +0200, Przemyslaw Gawronski escribió: > > Nice work. Now we need someone who could bring a subset of the > > Reference Card onto a coffee mug. I've already have one for the most > > used 'vi' commands which was sold for ~10 euros years ago :-) >

Re: Mutt Quick Reference v.1.03 (addition from Markus Miedaner)

2007-10-23 Thread Przemyslaw Gawronski
> Nice work. Now we need someone who could bring a subset of the > Reference Card onto a coffee mug. I've already have one for the most > used 'vi' commands which was sold for ~10 euros years ago :-) Any shot of that one to take a look? :) Przemek -- AIKIDO TANREN DOJO - Poland - Warsaw - Mok

Re: Mutt Quick Reference v.1.03 (addition from Markus Miedaner)

2007-10-23 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Tuesday, October 23, 2007 a las 02:19:12PM -0600, Joseph escribió: > Mutt Quick Reference v.1.03 - updated. > http://www.sys-concept.com/Mutt_connections.html > > This contribution is from: Markus Miedaner of Germany > Thank Markus for Great Job! > It is looking better every time :-) Nic

Re: Mutt Quick Reference v.1.00

2007-10-23 Thread cga2000
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 11:13:11AM EDT, Joseph wrote: > Since I couldn't find one I created Mutt Quick Reference v1.0 (PDF file) > especially useful for new users. > It is just two pages reference and looks best when you print it on a > Color Printer. > > I wanted to add a link to MuttWiki but I

Mutt Quick Reference v.1.03 (addition from Markus Miedaner)

2007-10-23 Thread Joseph
Mutt Quick Reference v.1.03 - updated. http://www.sys-concept.com/Mutt_connections.html This contribution is from: Markus Miedaner of Germany Thank Markus for Great Job! It is looking better every time :-) -- #Joseph GPG KeyID: ED0E1FB7 pgp8XeUw9NVl7.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Updating to Ubuntu Gutsy no longer shows message counts

2007-10-23 Thread Bill Moseley
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 11:44:17AM -0700, Brendan Cully wrote: > > Due to a bug in the conversion from CVS, this may not give you the > most recent change. Try > > hg update -C HEAD Thanks, that updated 124 files. But, now the counts are never shown :-( I just built 1.4.2.3 and that works fine

Re: How to send a return receipt

2007-10-23 Thread Rado S
=- Patrick Schoenfeld wrote on Tue 23.Oct'07 at 20:28:41 +0200 -= > Because i face the fact that it is _impossible_ to convince you. > You exepect us to prove that the feature request is valid, No, I see your point, you don't have to convince me nor prove anything. I'm absolutely clear about your

Re: How to send a return receipt

2007-10-23 Thread Rado S
=- Derek Martin wrote on Sun 21.Oct'07 at 20:55:07 -0400 -= > {...} with its major goal being to suck less than the other mail > clients. It says the latter explicitly on its home page. Inasmuch > as it does not implement standard features offered by other > clients, it is a failure in that goal.

Re: Updating to Ubuntu Gutsy no longer shows message counts

2007-10-23 Thread Brendan Cully
On Monday, 22 October 2007 at 12:21, Bill Moseley wrote: > On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 09:54:30AM +0300, Petteri wrote: > > > > After upgrading my laptop from Feisty to Gutsy today when I get a list > > > > of mailboxes (c-?-) it shows all my subscribed mail boxes but > > > > with zero counts. > > > >

Re: Updating to Ubuntu Gutsy no longer shows message counts

2007-10-23 Thread Bill Moseley
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 10:50:49PM +0300, Petteri wrote: > > > but there the counts were *never* shown. So, I'm a bit baffled > > considering that the debian/changelog does indeed have the message you > > quoted above. > > I'm using Debian unstable and I'm see the counts. Strange. Are you usin

Re: How to send a return receipt

2007-10-23 Thread Patrick Schoenfeld
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 06:14:48PM +0200, Rado S wrote: > Yes, but I think you're too paranoid or haven't noticed the required > tools for such a solution: they are _basic_ unix tools like "ls", which I don't know who you process headers with basic unix tools, but I don't care. Because i face the

Re: How to send a return receipt

2007-10-23 Thread Rado S
=- Patrick Schoenfeld wrote on Mon 22.Oct'07 at 15:37:45 +0200 -= > I don't think that the term 'harmful' needs an explination in > whats mutt about. Harmful is what affects mutt in any negative > way. Thats not about philosophy, but about technical matters. Well, ... your viewpoint is limited to

Re: How to send a return receipt

2007-10-23 Thread Rado S
=- Derek Martin wrote on Tue 16.Oct'07 at 17:39:49 -0400 -= > If a function is e-mail related, and commonly supported by other > mailers, then it seems to me Mutt should have built-in support for > it too. Mutt is a Mail USER Agent (not a mail DEVELOPER agent), > and it should interoperate with ot

Re: How to send a return receipt

2007-10-23 Thread Rado S
=- Derek Martin wrote on Tue 16.Oct'07 at 18:32:00 -0400 -= > > If your pet feature is minimal code, but the developers don't want > > to include it because what you're asking is already possible another > > way -- just maintain a local patch for it. > > So have I, and it sucks. I agree, in gene

Re: How to send a return receipt

2007-10-23 Thread Rado S
=- Derek Martin wrote on Wed 17.Oct'07 at 7:33:46 -0400 -= > Being able to say, "Mutt can do that, if you write a script to do > it, and write a macro to invoke the script and..." does not > constitute support for a feature in Mutt. Mutt should implement > features that are commonly implemented i

Re: How to send a return receipt

2007-10-23 Thread Rado S
=- Patrick Schoenfeld wrote on Wed 17.Oct'07 at 16:48:24 +0200 -= > After all its not too hard to achieve all this, but its wasted > effort, as with a lot of care you cannot guarantee that this will > run in a few days, weeks or months because admin could decide to > remove just one of the tools y

Re: How to send a return receipt

2007-10-23 Thread Rado S
=- Derek Martin wrote on Wed 17.Oct'07 at 10:58:52 -0400 -= > On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 07:52:03AM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote: > > Actually, one of the things that makes mutt suck less than other > > MUAs is that it *doesn't* have additional hundreds of > > little-used "features" to cause bloat, b

Re: How to send a return receipt

2007-10-23 Thread Rado S
=- Derek Martin wrote on Mon 22.Oct'07 at 11:46:26 -0400 -= > But still, I want my mailer to do everything related to the normal > processing of mail, mostly without any fuss from me. I should only > have to make a fuss if what I want to do is unusual -- which this > isn't. a) how to determine "u

Re: How to send a return receipt

2007-10-23 Thread Rado S
=- Patrick Schoenfeld wrote on Mon 22.Oct'07 at 20:45:53 +0200 -= > HTML mails, hmm. Bad thing. I don't like, nor do I write them > myself, but receiving them (because some suppliers think they > don't have to follow my wish if I ask them to not do so) is very > uncomfortable in mutt. But its just

Re: Asian fonts / xterm with Mutt

2007-10-23 Thread Joseph
Thanks for the input Derek, On 10/23/07 01:12, Derek Martin wrote: The key to displaying all of those languages simultaneously is UTF-8. Your locale should look something like this: $ locale LANG=en_US.UTF-8 LC_CTYPE="en_US.UTF-8" LC_NUMERIC="en_US.UTF-8" LC_TIME="en_US.UTF-8" LC_COLLATE=C LC_M