Re: tagged items

2008-09-22 Thread bill lam
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > * bill lam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-21-08 22:36]: > > A related question, how to untag all tagged items? > > the question mark "?" will give you a help screen. Open it in "index" > mode to see the tag operations. Sounds like rtfm. -- regards,

Re: tagged items

2008-09-22 Thread bill lam
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, Vance Shipley wrote: > On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 10:34:11AM +0800, bill lam wrote: > } A related question, how to untag all tagged entrys? > > Bill, > > The tag-entry function (default = 't') key actually toggles > the tagging of an entry. Bearing that in mind to untag all >

mutt + screen = broken colours?

2008-09-22 Thread Pau
Hi, I would like to use mutt with screen. My problem is that my defined colours (see bottom) are not displayed correctly on screen. I am using TERM=xterm-xfree86 in my zshrc, but TERM=screen doens't help. Typically the background is not uniform but has white lines randomly displayed. I don't thi

Re: mutt + screen = broken colours?

2008-09-22 Thread Stefan Wimmer
* Pau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-22 11:40]: > Hi, > > I would like to use mutt with screen. My problem is that my defined > colours (see bottom) are not displayed correctly on screen. I am using > TERM=xterm-xfree86 in my zshrc, but TERM=screen doens't help. > > Typically the background is not

Re: tagged items

2008-09-22 Thread Christian Ebert
* bill lam on Monday, September 22, 2008 at 16:30:00 +0800 > On Sun, 21 Sep 2008, Patrick Shanahan wrote: >> * bill lam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-21-08 22:36]: >>> A related question, how to untag all tagged items? >> >> the question mark "?" will give you a help screen. Open it in "index" >> mode

limit to single-mail 'threads'

2008-09-22 Thread holger . dinkel
Hi list, I was wondering whether it was possible to 'limit' the index to those mails which are NOT part of a thread. On some mailinglists there occur spam-mails sporadically. I thought of (tagging and) deleting them by limiting mutt to show only mails which have no response to them. (Nobody repl

Re: limit to single-mail 'threads'

2008-09-22 Thread Nicolas Rachinsky
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-09-22 13:40 +0200]: > On some mailinglists there occur spam-mails sporadically. > I thought of (tagging and) deleting them by limiting mutt to show only mails > which have no response to them. (Nobody replies to spam-mails! ;-> ) > > Is this possible? !~(~h in-reply-to)

Re: limit to single-mail 'threads'

2008-09-22 Thread holger . dinkel
Hi Nicolas, thanks for your quick reply. You are right. The pattern !~(~h in-reply-to) does *approximately* what i need. ;-} It does, however, show me *some* threaded mails (which it shouldn't), but I guess that's due to bogus mail-clients not correctly setting the right headers or so... But

urls longer than terminal width in iterm

2008-09-22 Thread Rejo Zenger
Hi, I have this minor but annoying issue. I seem to be unable to fix it... Currently, I am using mutt with a fairly basic configuration on a server running Debian to which I am connected using iTerm under OSX 10.5. When someone sends me an URL in an e-mail, I can click (using command key and l

Re: urls longer than terminal width in iterm

2008-09-22 Thread Mark Harrison
> The annoyance is with overly long addresses, that are wider than my > terminal. These addresses are wrapped to the next line(s) and it's > continuation lines are marked with the "+" sign. Now, when I click these > addresses the newline and plus sign are replaced by "+ ", resulting in > an inv

Re: urls longer than terminal width in iterm

2008-09-22 Thread Rejo Zenger
++ 22/09/08 10:19 -0400 - Mark Harrison: >> The annoyance is with overly long addresses, that are wider than my >> terminal. These addresses are wrapped to the next line(s) and it's >> continuation lines are marked with the "+" sign. Now, when I click these >> addresses the newline and plus sign

Re: mutt + screen = broken colours?

2008-09-22 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday, September 22 at 11:39 AM, quoth Pau: > I would like to use mutt with screen. My problem is that my defined > colours (see bottom) are not displayed correctly on screen. I am > using TERM=xterm-xfree86 in my zshrc, but TERM=screen doens't h

Re: limit to single-mail 'threads'

2008-09-22 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday, September 22 at 03:16 PM, quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED]: >PS: The !$ pattern isn't mentioned in the manual >(http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-4.html). What's it supposed to >do? It's in the man page: ~$ unreferenced message (req

Mutt with out user inputs ..???

2008-09-22 Thread Maruvada, Suryakiran
Hi , I need to use mutt with out user intervention. i.e my shell script will send my files as attachments to my mail DL automatically. I tried like this... Mutt -a attachment1 -a attachment2 -s SampleSubjectLine <> This is prompting me to confirm the mail body as well as other items. I wan

Re: Mutt with out user inputs ..???

2008-09-22 Thread Gary Johnson
On 2008-09-22, "Maruvada, Suryakiran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi , > > I need to use mutt with out user intervention. i.e my shell script will > send my files as attachments to my mail DL automatically. > > I tried like this... > > Mutt -a attachment1 -a attachment2 -s SampleSubjectLine

Re: urls longer than terminal width in iterm

2008-09-22 Thread Sebastian Waschik
Hello, Mark Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The annoyance is with overly long addresses, that are wider than my > > terminal. These addresses are wrapped to the next line(s) and it's > > continuation lines are marked with the "+" sign. Now, when I click these > > addresses the newline

delete duplicated mails

2008-09-22 Thread bill lam
Hello, After forwarding or copying, there are duplicated mails in local maibox folder. Is there an method to duplicated mails and only keep a copy of each mail? The "Message-ID" field in header section is intended to be the key field. -- regards, ==

Re: delete duplicated mails

2008-09-22 Thread Marianne Promberger
On Tuesday, 23 September 2008, 09:10 (UTC+0800), bill lam wrote: > Hello, > After forwarding or copying, there are duplicated mails in local > maibox folder. Is there an method to duplicated mails and only keep a > copy of each mail? The "Message-ID" field in header section is > intended to be the

Re: delete duplicated mails

2008-09-22 Thread bill lam
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Marianne Promberger wrote: > in muttrc: > set duplicate_threads = yes > > then: > > D~= > > (i.e. ~= ) > > I've actually got a folder-hook set to do this: > > folder-hook . push "~=" Thank you for quick response! That folder-hook is very convenient. -- regards, ==

Re: delete duplicated mails

2008-09-22 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* bill lam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-22-08 21:40]: > On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Marianne Promberger wrote: > > in muttrc: > > set duplicate_threads = yes > > > > then: > > > > D~= > > > > (i.e. ~= ) > > > > I've actually got a folder-hook set to do this: > > > > folder-hook . push "~=" > > Thank yo

Viewing mutt settings

2008-09-22 Thread Andrew Diederich
Is there a way for mutt to tell me what values I've set, or what values are default? For example, in postfix if I use "postconf -n" it tells me what values I've set. The problem I'm trying to solve is I'm setting colors, and I'm getting highlighted colors on my black background. For example, whe

Re: Viewing mutt settings

2008-09-22 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* Andrew Diederich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-22-08 21:49]: > Is there a way for mutt to tell me what values I've set, or what values > are default? For example, in postfix if I use "postconf -n" it tells > me what values I've set. > grep color /etc/muttrc ~/.muttrc -- Patrick Shanahan P

Re: delete duplicated mails

2008-09-22 Thread bill lam
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > It would *really* be a good time to spend a few minutes glancing thru > the very fine mutt documentation which you noted earlier as rtfm! Frankly speaking, I can not understand why you keeping telling people to rtfm in a support forum. If you do not ca

Re: delete duplicated mails

2008-09-22 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* bill lam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-22-08 22:34]: > On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > > It would *really* be a good time to spend a few minutes glancing thru > > the very fine mutt documentation which you noted earlier as rtfm! > Frankly speaking, I can not understand why you keeping t

Re: delete duplicated mails

2008-09-22 Thread bill lam
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > > If you do not care to help, there are other more helpful people. > > as you wish. Good! Please just ignore and do not response future mails from me. -- regards, GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-2

Re: delete duplicated mails

2008-09-22 Thread Sahil Tandon
bill lam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > > > If you do not care to help, there are other more helpful people. > > > > as you wish. > > Good! Please just ignore and do not response future mails from me. It is not in your best interest to antagonize Pat

Re: delete duplicated mails

2008-09-22 Thread bill lam
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, Sahil Tandon wrote: > bill lam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > > > > If you do not care to help, there are other more helpful people. > > > > > > as you wish. > > > > Good! Please just ignore and do not response future mails f

Re: delete duplicated mails

2008-09-22 Thread Pau
coming from the openbsd community, I know just too well that people should read the documentation before asking for something in the mailing list. These guys here are being nice to you, on misc@ they would have killed you and offered you to an evil god on a satanic ritual :D (just talking in jest)

Re: delete duplicated mails

2008-09-22 Thread Wilkinson, Alex
0n Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 09:38:50AM +0800, bill lam wrote: >> I've actually got a folder-hook set to do this: >> folder-hook . push "~=" mmm, i liked the idea of this folder-hook so i tried it out. Is it meant to automagically delete duplicate threads ? If so the following folder-hook

Re: Viewing mutt settings

2008-09-22 Thread Christian Brabandt
Hi Patrick! On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > * Andrew Diederich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-22-08 21:49]: > > Is there a way for mutt to tell me what values I've set, or what values > > are default? For example, in postfix if I use "postconf -n" it tells > > me what values I've set. m