Re: navigation

2009-07-20 Thread lee
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 10:44:07AM -0700, Robert Holtzman wrote: > Running mutt and mutt-patched 1.5.17 with the side panel listing > mailboxes on Ubuntu Hardy. I can't find a way to navigate in this list > other than by using "c" and "?". Is the side panel functional or just > informative? I

Re: xemacs qyestion

2009-07-20 Thread Joost Kremers
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 09:23:54PM -0600, lee wrote: > Oh? The post-mode worked just fine once I installed the package. If > there was something added to the configuration, the package management > must have done that for me. probably. gnu emacs doesn't have such package management... > > further

Re: xemacs qyestion

2009-07-20 Thread Joost Kremers
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 09:14:22PM -0600, lee wrote: > On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 11:05:00AM +0200, Joost Kremers wrote: > > Which is not going to work, because only the first matching mode in > > auto-mode-alist is activated. That's why auto-mode-alist should only be > > used for > > major modes, no

Extract whole thread

2009-07-20 Thread steve
Hi list, I would like to extract a whole thread from within mutt and save it elsewhere for further processing. Is this possible? Thanks, steve

Re: Extract whole thread

2009-07-20 Thread Monte Stevens
On 2009-07-20, steve wrote: > I would like to extract a whole thread from within mutt and save it > elsewhere for further processing. Is this possible? tag-thread tag-prefix save-message For me bound as: t ;s -- Monte

Re: split display?

2009-07-20 Thread Tim Gray
On Sun 19, Jul'09 at 10:03 PM -0600, lee wrote: mailboxes `/path/to/script/listbox.py /path/to/mail/folders` Thanks! Doesn't that need to produce some output, or does mutt have a way to assign the content of "dirs" from the script to "mailboxes"? The command in your muttrc ends up looking lik

Export whole thread

2009-07-20 Thread steve
Hi, Sorry for the new post, but I tried someone's solution on the one I opened, and I lost it I don't know why. I tried on another one and that time it work. The only problem is that I wanted to save the thread in a special folder and I coulnd't, mutt asked if I wanted to create a new mailbox in ~

Re: split display?

2009-07-20 Thread lee
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 09:55:42AM -0400, Tim Gray wrote: > On Sun 19, Jul'09 at 10:03 PM -0600, lee wrote: >>> mailboxes `/path/to/script/listbox.py /path/to/mail/folders` >> >> Thanks! Doesn't that need to produce some output, or does mutt have a >> way to assign the content of "dirs" from the sc

Re: xemacs qyestion

2009-07-20 Thread lee
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 01:33:23PM +0200, Joost Kremers wrote: > On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 09:14:22PM -0600, lee wrote: > > That's what I mean: How do you know all that? > > years of using emacs... ;-) i follow two emacs-related newsgroups, i regularly > consult emacs documentation, i read the wiki

Re: split display?

2009-07-20 Thread Tim Gray
On Mon 20, Jul'09 at 1:02 PM -0600, lee wrote: Oh. I was trying the script from the command line just to see what it would do, and it didn't produce any output. It seems the script fills a variable it uses. I'm wondering how mutt knows that it needs to take its information from this variable.

Re: xemacs qyestion

2009-07-20 Thread lee
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 01:29:24PM +0200, Joost Kremers wrote: > On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 09:23:54PM -0600, lee wrote: > > Oh? The post-mode worked just fine once I installed the package. If > > there was something added to the configuration, the package management > > must have done that for me. >

Re: split display?

2009-07-20 Thread Christian Ebert
* lee on Monday, July 20, 2009 at 13:02:29 -0600 > Thanks! But I don't know python --- I might try where I get to with a > bash script, maybe using find ... But now that I have the list, I > could try to keep them up to date. The following could be a start, it came up in comp.mail.mutt: mailboxes

Re: split display?

2009-07-20 Thread lee
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 03:16:25PM -0400, Tim Gray wrote: > On Mon 20, Jul'09 at 1:02 PM -0600, lee wrote: >> Oh. I was trying the script from the command line just to see what it >> would do, and it didn't produce any output. > > Hmm, when I call the script here from the command line, I get an ou

Re: split display?

2009-07-20 Thread Tim Gray
On Mon 20, Jul'09 at 4:54 PM -0600, lee wrote: Maybe some sort of print statement was missing (cut off). Yeah I probably left it off or something. It should look something like this: for i in dirs: print '"+l/%s"' % i, Is there an IMAP server that can handle maildir? I'd use Cyru

Re: split display?

2009-07-20 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* Tim Gray [07-20-09 19:26]: > > I've not done it yet, but it was my understanding that UW-IMAP and > Dovecot at least both serve from maildir. I think Courier might as > well. Dovecot may be configured for mbox... -- Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USAHOG # US1244711 htt

Re: Inline text attachments

2009-07-20 Thread Noah Slater
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 11:43:41AM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > note in his attachment, he has: > > text/html; view %s; edit=emacs22 %s; compose=emacs22 ... %s; needsterminal Thanks, I got this working now. -- Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater

Re: Conditionally removing signature

2009-07-20 Thread Noah Slater
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 02:06:23PM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote: > Please see if this example and text above it helps you: > >http://dev.mutt.org/doc/manual.html#ex-recips > > If I understand you right (mail _only_ to you: no sig, mail you and > other in the recips: sig), then this may work (un

Automatic thread collapsing

2009-07-20 Thread Noah Slater
Hey, Is there any way to get mutt to continually and automatically collapse threads as you move around in the pager? So, if I select a collapsed thread, it should be un-collapsed, but as I move out of it, it is re-collapsed. Thanks, -- Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater

Search previous command

2009-07-20 Thread Noah Slater
Hey, Is there a search-previous command, like the search-next command? Thanks, -- Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater

Re: split display?

2009-07-20 Thread lee
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 07:24:48PM -0400, Tim Gray wrote: > On Mon 20, Jul'09 at 4:54 PM -0600, lee wrote: >> Maybe some sort of print statement was missing (cut off). > > Yeah I probably left it off or something. It should look something like > this: > > for i in dirs: > print '"+l/%s"'

program to generate mailboxes lines (Re: split display?)

2009-07-20 Thread lee
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:11:15PM -0600, lee wrote: > > Here's the program. Let me know how you like it :) Hn, one small adjustment: The recursion level is irrelevant, but I forgot to remove the counter. // check a directory hierachy for maildir directories recursively; print // mailbox comma

Re: split display?

2009-07-20 Thread lee
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 09:39:27PM +0100, Christian Ebert wrote: > > The following could be a start, it came up in comp.mail.mutt: > > mailboxes `find ~/Mail -type d \( \( -name cur -o -name new -o -name tmp \) > -prune -o -print \) \ >| tr '\n' ' '` > > (if your find has -printf yo

setting mailboxes from the output of a command

2009-07-20 Thread lee
Hi, how do you set mailboxes from the output of a command? The documentation says: my_hdr X-Operating-System: `uname -a` The output of the Unix command ``uname -a'' will be substituted before the line is parsed. Note that since initialization files are line oriented, only the first li

Re: setting mailboxes from the output of a command

2009-07-20 Thread lee
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 11:22:03PM -0600, lee wrote: > How do I set the mailboxes from the command output? I don't want to > use a file with mailboxes lines and source that. Never mind, I found that the program to run must be in the path. It's working now: mailboxes = `mutt-mb /home/lee/Mail`

Re: Search previous command

2009-07-20 Thread Peter Wiersig
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 03:15:37AM +0100, Noah Slater wrote: > > Is there a search-previous command, like the search-next command? Yup, see "?" Peter

Re: split display?

2009-07-20 Thread Jan-Herbert Damm
Tim Gray wrote on 20.07.09: > On Mon 20, Jul'09 at 4:54 PM -0600, lee wrote: >> Maybe some sort of print statement was missing (cut off). > > Yeah I probably left it off or something. It should look something like > this: > > for i in dirs: > print '"+l/%s"' % i, or for i in dirs:

Re: Search previous command

2009-07-20 Thread Noah Slater
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 08:27:33AM +0200, Peter Wiersig wrote: > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 03:15:37AM +0100, Noah Slater wrote: > > > > Is there a search-previous command, like the search-next command? > > Yup, see "?" Ah, I was tripped up by the odd naming. The following did the trick: bind ind