couldn't save certificate

2009-08-17 Thread Dale A. Raby
Having a problem with Gmail. When I try to get my mail via IMAP, I get an error message "couldn't save certificate" when I attempt to save the certificate listed below. This happened after an upgrade from Fedora 9 to Fedora 11. This certificate belongs to: Google Internet Authority Goo

Re: What is the best way to approach "Deleted" mail removal from

2009-08-17 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Monday, August 17 at 12:32 PM, quoth Rocco Rutte: > [ btw, any idea why your subject is truncated? ] Huh... I hadn't noticed that. I haven't a clue. Is this one also truncated? >> If you have no choice but to use POP3, I highly recommend you us

Re: pressing 'g' truncates

2009-08-17 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sunday, August 16 at 09:18 PM, quoth Ravi Uday: >I think its only some msgs, as I don't see it happening now. >But it definitely happens. >Is there a way to find out which msgs it truncates Observe when it happens, and see if you notice a pattern

more strange behavior

2009-08-17 Thread RobertHoltzman
After getting the weirdness with the "m" command sorted out, a new problem cropped up. When Mutt first opens it reads all the mailboxes over and over and over. This goes on for ~60 seconds after which my INCOMING mailbox opens. At this point issuing any command, be it the up or down arrows, ^n,

Re: strange results w/ "m" command[SOLVED]

2009-08-17 Thread Robert Holtzman
I just realised I inadvertantly replied directly to the sender instead of to the list. My apologies. On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:41:18AM +1000, Jaime Tarrant wrote: > > This sounds to me like you have a postponed message - in this case, when > you go to compose a new message again, mutt brings bac

Re: strange results w/ "m" command

2009-08-17 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Robert Holtzman wrote: > Any ideas appreciated. Well, for the postpone issue, see the $postpone setting in your local copy of the manual or online. The bindings: mutt is not disabling them (why should it), you probably didn't specify them for the postponed menu. For all available menus, pl

Re: Quick suggestion

2009-08-17 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Edd Barrett wrote: > What do you think of a progress indication when you close a large > mailbox. I use mutt with gmail and frequently when I close a mailing > list folder it takes a while. User feedback would be nice :) I have a patch in my queue at bitbucket that does this: http://bit

Re: What is the best way to approach "Deleted" mail removal from

2009-08-17 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Kyle Wheeler wrote: > But mutt DOES have a message cache (if you enable it) that you can > inspect without being online. See the documentation of > 'message_cachedir'. But then you must have viewed the message at least once. That a message is not in the cache means either a) deleted or b)

Re: What is the best way to approach "Deleted" mail removal from

2009-08-17 Thread Rocco Rutte
[ btw, any idea why your subject is truncated? ] Hi, * Kyle Wheeler wrote: > On Thursday, August 13 at 10:38 AM, quoth Paul Grinberg: > > So, let's say my fetchmail keeps all the mail on the mail server > > after mail download is complete. > Without being rude, let me stop you right there. Fetch