Re: Bounce message from a different from address.

2010-02-22 Thread Horacio Sanson
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 06:45:48PM -0600, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 09:34:51AM +0900, Horacio Sanson wrote: > > I send a long email to a mailing list but after sending it I realized I > > send the email using the wrong from: address. Of course the message got > > bounced > > b

Re: Bounce message from a different from address.

2010-02-22 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 09:34:51AM +0900, Horacio Sanson wrote: > I send a long email to a mailing list but after sending it I realized I > send the email using the wrong from: address. Of course the message got > bounced > back because that address is not registered in the mailing list. > > Now

Bounce message from a different from address.

2010-02-22 Thread Horacio Sanson
I send a long email to a mailing list but after sending it I realized I send the email using the wrong from: address. Of course the message got bounced back because that address is not registered in the mailing list. Now this should be easy to do but I have not found a simple way to resend the me

Re: How to build mutt

2010-02-22 Thread Michael Elkins
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 06:21:52PM +0100, Gary wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 08:10:17AM -0800, Michael Elkins wrote: > > The USE_* options are typically controlled via --enable-* or --with-* > > Err. In the sense I can use whichever form I like, or in the sense that > one or other will work, de

Re: How to build mutt

2010-02-22 Thread Gary
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 08:10:17AM -0800, Michael Elkins wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:19:56AM +0100, Gary wrote: > > are all the capabilities included using "--enable-WHATEVER"? if so, why > > do some final results start with USE, some with HAVE, and others nothing > > special at all? If no

Re: How to build mutt

2010-02-22 Thread Michael Elkins
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:19:56AM +0100, Gary wrote: > I know it should be as simple as './configure [some options]' followed > by 'make install', but I am at a loss knowing which options I should > apply in order to have the same capabilities as another build's. For > example in order to have >

Re: Set a default To value based on current folder name?

2010-02-22 Thread Nicolas KOWALSKI
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 03:45:32PM +0100, Jostein Berntsen wrote: > On 22.02.10,14:07, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 01:10:57PM +0100, Zeerak Mustafa Waseem wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:51:55PM +0100, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote: > > > > > > > > When composing a new mai

Re: Set a default To value based on current folder name?

2010-02-22 Thread Rado S
=- Jostein Berntsen wrote on Mon 22.Feb'10 at 15:45:32 +0100 -= > > > > When composing a new mail, is it possible to specify a > > > > default To address based on the current folder name ? > > > > I just would like to automate the process for all my > > mailing-lists folders, if possible. > > Ha

Re: Set a default To value based on current folder name?

2010-02-22 Thread Jostein Berntsen
On 22.02.10,14:07, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 01:10:57PM +0100, Zeerak Mustafa Waseem wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:51:55PM +0100, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote: > > > > > > When composing a new mail, is it possible to specify a default To > > > address based on the curren

Re: Set a default To value based on current folder name?

2010-02-22 Thread Nicolas KOWALSKI
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 01:10:57PM +0100, Zeerak Mustafa Waseem wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:51:55PM +0100, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote: > > > > When composing a new mail, is it possible to specify a default To > > address based on the current folder name ? > > > > For example, when I am in th

Re: Set a default To value based on current folder name?

2010-02-22 Thread Zeerak Mustafa Waseem
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:51:55PM +0100, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote: > Hello, > > When composing a new mail, is it possible to specify a default To > address based on the current folder name ? > > For example, when I am in the folder "list.mutt", I would like the "To:" > field to be prefilled with

Set a default To value based on current folder name?

2010-02-22 Thread Nicolas KOWALSKI
Hello, When composing a new mail, is it possible to specify a default To address based on the current folder name ? For example, when I am in the folder "list.mutt", I would like the "To:" field to be prefilled with the "mutt-users@mutt.org" value when composing a new mail. Thanks, -- Nicola

Re: Mutt and multiple imap accounts

2010-02-22 Thread Zeerak Mustafa Waseem
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 09:42:19AM +0900, Horacio Sanson wrote: > On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 02:57:41PM +0100, Zeerak Waseem wrote: > > Hey, > > > > I'm having some difficulties with mutt and multiple imaps; I've been > > trying to set it up for my private mail and my uni mail, but I can't seem > > t

Re: Deletion flag lost when leaving the folder

2010-02-22 Thread Nicholas Longo
Here is the patch. I wrote this back in 2006 and haven't looked at it since then. I am sure if fixes the problem for the mbox format (that is what I use) and some other mailboxes, but I am not 100% sure I attempted to change the code for Maildir formats. Since it is so old the patch only patche

Re: Mutt and multiple imap accounts

2010-02-22 Thread Horacio Sanson
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 02:57:41PM +0100, Zeerak Waseem wrote: > Hey, > > I'm having some difficulties with mutt and multiple imaps; I've been > trying to set it up for my private mail and my uni mail, but I can't seem > to get it to work. I've been following two entries from the wiki (mainly) > t

How to build mutt

2010-02-22 Thread Gary
I know it should be as simple as './configure [some options]' followed by 'make install', but I am at a loss knowing which options I should apply in order to have the same capabilities as another build's. For example in order to have +BUFFY_SIZE -DEBUG -DL_STANDALONE -DOMAIN +ENABLE_NLS -EXACT_ADD