Mutt fails to use mailcap entry for opening text/x-diff attachments

2010-03-14 Thread Stefano Sabatini
Hi all, I recently upgraded my Debian to Squeezy from Lenny, since then mutt fails to view attachment of type text/x-diff using the corresponding mailcap entry. $ mutt -v | head -n 1 Mutt 1.5.20 (2009-06-14) I have in my ~/.mailcap: text/x-csrc; vim -R %s text/x-chdr; vim -R %s text/x-diff; vim

Re: Mutt fails to use mailcap entry for opening text/x-diff attachments

2010-03-14 Thread Michael Elkins
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 03:25:49PM +0100, Stefano Sabatini wrote: > I recently upgraded my Debian to Squeezy from Lenny, since then mutt > fails to view attachment of type text/x-diff using the corresponding > mailcap entry. The Debian package for Mutt includes a patch which forces text/x-diff to

Re: Mutt fails to use mailcap entry for opening text/x-diff attachments

2010-03-14 Thread Stefano Sabatini
On date Sunday 2010-03-14 08:21:05 -0700, Michael Elkins muttered: > On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 03:25:49PM +0100, Stefano Sabatini wrote: > > I recently upgraded my Debian to Squeezy from Lenny, since then mutt > > fails to view attachment of type text/x-diff using the corresponding > > mailcap entry.

Re: Mutt fails to use mailcap entry for opening text/x-diff attachments

2010-03-14 Thread Michael Elkins
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 06:19:58PM +0100, Stefano Sabatini wrote: > Can you say why this behavior has been implemented? Is this considered > a bug? It looks like the behavior was changed as a result of this bug: http://dev.mutt.org/trac/ticket/3246 > As for me I found that behavior quite annoyin

Status Flags (Crypt sign & Verified Sign) not working properly.

2010-03-14 Thread rogerx
Status flag "s" does not work with the following option set: set crypt_timestamp = yes Setting to "no", now shows "s" for a status flag. Also, when submitting patches(?) along with gpg signing, the flag will remain lowercase "s" even after the message's signature is verified. =mail-client/mut

Re: Status Flags (Crypt sign & Verified Sign) not working properly.

2010-03-14 Thread Michael Elkins
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 06:43:37PM -0800, rog...@sdf.org wrote: > Status flag "s" does not work with the following option set: > set crypt_timestamp = yes > > Setting to "no", now shows "s" for a status flag. > > Also, when submitting patches(?) along with gpg signing, the flag will > remain lowe

Re: send-hook and forward_format

2010-03-14 Thread Michael Elkins
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 08:57:03AM +0100, Alexandre wrote: > send-hook does not match aliases but only e-mail adress ? > For example, be aliases: > alias test TEST > send-hook ^.*TEST.*$ "set forward_format='[TAG]'" > does not match the alias... > > How to configure it ? send-hook's will not mat

Re: Status Flags (Crypt sign & Verified Sign) not working properly.

2010-03-14 Thread rogerx
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 08:52:15PM -0700, Michael Elkins wrote: >On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 06:43:37PM -0800, rog...@sdf.org wrote: >> Status flag "s" does not work with the following option set: >> set crypt_timestamp = yes >> >> Setting to "no", now shows "s" for a status flag. >> >> Also, when su