Re: A need for a "new-hook"?

2010-07-13 Thread Adam Bolte
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 04:24:53PM +1000, Adam Bolte wrote: > > > Does anyone have any idea how I can trigger a hook *only* when writing a > > > new > > > message? Maybe there's a patch floating around that I should know about? > > In case this was not clear, by "new message", I mean a fresh e-m

Re: URL not extracted from HTML by w3m in mutt autoview

2010-07-13 Thread Gary Johnson
On 2010-07-13, Erik Christiansen wrote: > Most URLs arriving in html messages are eminently discardable, but today > I received one worth trying. Mutt's autoview invokes w3m, which extracts > most of the html text, but renders the URL as nothing more than '*'. > > There are three matching lines in

Re: URL not extracted from HTML by w3m in mutt autoview

2010-07-13 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* Erik Christiansen [07-13-10 03:44]: > Most URLs arriving in html messages are eminently discardable, but today > I received one worth trying. Mutt's autoview invokes w3m, which extracts > most of the html text, but renders the URL as nothing more than '*'. > check the header for "Content-Type:

Re: A need for a "new-hook"?

2010-07-13 Thread Monte Stevens
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 04:24:53PM +1000, Adam Bolte wrote: > > Does anyone have any idea how I can trigger a hook *only* when writing a new > > message? Maybe there's a patch floating around that I should know about? > In case this was not clear, by "new message", I mean a fresh e-mail that is > n

URL not extracted from HTML by w3m in mutt autoview

2010-07-13 Thread Erik Christiansen
Most URLs arriving in html messages are eminently discardable, but today I received one worth trying. Mutt's autoview invokes w3m, which extracts most of the html text, but renders the URL as nothing more than '*'. There are three matching lines in /etc/mailcap: text/html; /usr/bin/sensible-browse