[ Will Yardley Wrote On Tue 27.Nov'12 at 7:40:45 GMT ]
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 09:57:33AM +, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
> >
> > Does anyone have or know of a perl or python script, or even a shell
> > script, that removes the multipart/(mixed|alternative| ... ) parts of
> > incoming mail an
* On 25 Nov 2012, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
> >
> > In the end the new version of the message is generated by formail, so
> > it's subject to formail's limitations, if it has any. (I don't know of
> > any.) It would be possible to update the python script to handle the
> > rewrite with python c
=- Jeremy Kitchen wrote on Mon 26.Nov'12 at 10:48:24 -0800 -=
> > don't you think this discussion has been exhausted to death now?
> > It only started out as a request to wrap lines in my email bodies.
>
> I do find that part kind of funny.
>
> You were asked to wrap, came up with a reasonable
[ Rado S Wrote On Tue 27.Nov'12 at 10:20:12 GMT ]
> =- Jeremy Kitchen wrote on Mon 26.Nov'12 at 10:48:24 -0800 -=
>
> > > don't you think this discussion has been exhausted to death now?
> > > It only started out as a request to wrap lines in my email bodies.
> >
> > I do find that part kind o
[ David Champion Wrote On Tue 27.Nov'12 at 10:18:32 GMT ]
> * On 25 Nov 2012, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
> > >
> > > In the end the new version of the message is generated by formail, so
> > > it's subject to formail's limitations, if it has any. (I don't know of
> > > any.) It would be possibl
On 2012-11-26, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
> Does anyone have or know of a perl or python script, or even a shell
> script, that removes the multipart/(mixed|alternative| ... ) parts of
> incoming mail and leaves or converts the message into plain text?
Here's the Python program I use to handle mi
On 2012-11-27, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
> [ Rado S Wrote On Tue 27.Nov'12 at 10:20:12 GMT ]
>
>>> You were asked to wrap, came up with a reasonable excuse why you
>>> weren't, got a solution in reply and said "ok, thanks, I'll do that".
>>>
>>> Three weeks later...
>>
>> Occasionally the secret
On 2012-11-27, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
>
> I'm sorry but you've lost me again :-) - both of you
There are two kinds of people:
1) Those who oppose ambiguity
2) Those who are wrong
Now those who oppose ambiguity want quotes to be trimmed, with a
direct reply underneath so there is no ambig
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 08:01:04AM +, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
> Hi Will, yes i've looked at demime and even used it in the past but it's
> primarily for mailing lists and it strips out too much for my needs.
> Thanks for the suggestion though.
If memory serves, it's configurable, so you sho
* On 27 Nov 2012, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
> David thank you very much indeed, it works beautifully. I really
> appreciate you giving up your time to create it and modify it. I'm sure
> it will be prove useful to plenty of people.
Great, thanks for the update. I'm glad it's helped.
Time now t
[ Tony's unattended mail Wrote On Tue 27.Nov'12 at 16:45:58 GMT ]
> On 2012-11-27, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
> >
> > I'm sorry but you've lost me again :-) - both of you
>
> There are two kinds of people:
>
> 1) Those who oppose ambiguity
> 2) Those who are wrong
>
> Now those who oppose a
11 matches
Mail list logo
