got mutt to compile, but won't authenticate

2014-01-04 Thread Charles E Campbell
Hello! I used David Champion's suggestion to compile mutt with: --enable-smtp so at least its not complaining about smtp_pass and smtp_url being undefined variables (Thanks!). However, mutt still doesn't recognize header_cache or certificatg_file (again, undefined variables), and it still w

Re: got mutt to compile, but won't authenticate

2014-01-04 Thread Suvayu Ali
On Sat, Jan 04, 2014 at 12:28:46PM -0500, Charles E Campbell wrote: > Hello! > > I used David Champion's suggestion to compile mutt with: > > --enable-smtp > > so at least its not complaining about smtp_pass and smtp_url being undefined > variables (Thanks!). > > However, mutt still doesn't rec

mutt native SMPT support vs Postfix?

2014-01-04 Thread Ulrich Lauther
Recent posts made me aware of the fact, that mutt supports SMPT. So far I have been using postfix for mail transport. Which way is better, and why? Thanks for advice, ulrich

Re: mutt native SMPT support vs Postfix?

2014-01-04 Thread Chris Down
On 2014-01-04 19:35:19 +0100, Ulrich Lauther wrote: > Recent posts made me aware of the fact, that mutt supports SMPT. > So far I have been using postfix for mail transport. > Which way is better, and why? "Better" is subjective. Using Postfix for this is pretty heavy duty over using a purpose-bui

Re: mutt native SMPT support vs Postfix?

2014-01-04 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Sunday, January 05, 2014 a las 02:50:12AM +0800, Chris Down escribió: > On 2014-01-04 19:35:19 +0100, Ulrich Lauther wrote: > > Recent posts made me aware of the fact, that mutt supports SMPT. > > So far I have been using postfix for mail transport. > > Which way is better, and why? > > "B

Re: got mutt to compile, but won't authenticate

2014-01-04 Thread Charles E Campbell
Suvayu Ali wrote: On Sat, Jan 04, 2014 at 12:28:46PM -0500, Charles E Campbell wrote: Hello! I used David Champion's suggestion to compile mutt with: --enable-smtp so at least its not complaining about smtp_pass and smtp_url being undefined variables (Thanks!). However, mutt still doesn't re

Re: got mutt to compile, but won't authenticate

2014-01-04 Thread Charles E Campbell
Suvayu Ali wrote: On Sat, Jan 04, 2014 at 12:28:46PM -0500, Charles E Campbell wrote: Hello! I used David Champion's suggestion to compile mutt with: --enable-smtp so at least its not complaining about smtp_pass and smtp_url being undefined variables (Thanks!). However, mutt still doesn't re

Re: got mutt to compile, but won't authenticate

2014-01-04 Thread Tom Furie
On Sat, Jan 04, 2014 at 12:28:46PM -0500, Charles E Campbell wrote: > However, mutt still doesn't recognize header_cache or > certificatg_file (again, undefined variables), and it still won't > send mail. I'm not very familiar with this side of mutt, but are you sure that certificatg_file isn't a

Syncing settings, different folder-hooks on different machines

2014-01-04 Thread Niels Kobschaetzki
Hi, I sync my settings between different machines via Dropbox. I have settings for several accounts and each in its own file. When I open a specific inbox via a macro like macro index 'imaps://acco...@mailserver.com/INBOX' I use a folder-hook to source a specific account file folder-hook 'mail

Re: got mutt to compile, but won't authenticate

2014-01-04 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 04Jan2014 20:30, Tom Furie wrote: > On Sat, Jan 04, 2014 at 12:28:46PM -0500, Charles E Campbell wrote: > > > However, mutt still doesn't recognize header_cache or > > certificatg_file (again, undefined variables), and it still won't > > send mail. > > I'm not very familiar with this side of

Re: mutt native SMPT support vs Postfix?

2014-01-04 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 04Jan2014 20:01, Matthias Apitz wrote: > El día Sunday, January 05, 2014 a las 02:50:12AM +0800, Chris Down escribió: > > On 2014-01-04 19:35:19 +0100, Ulrich Lauther wrote: > > > Recent posts made me aware of the fact, that mutt supports SMPT. > > > So far I have been using postfix for mail tr

Re: mutt native SMPT support vs Postfix?

2014-01-04 Thread Chris Down
On 2014-01-04 20:01:56 +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote: > I'm using mutt (right now by typing) on my FreeBSD netbook, connected > via UMTS WAN to my ISP. My mutt drops the mail (this mail) to the local > MTA (sendmail) and this takes care for the transport to the next MX hop, > even if the WAN link is