On 21.06.2015, jonas hedman wrote:
> I'm from Sweden and I occasionally communicate with other swedish people
> using pgp and I've stumbled upon this problem:
> If I encrypt a message containg any of the swedish letters "åÅäÄöÖ"
> using inline format everythings works just fine but when I encrypt
* On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 11:53PM -0400 Xu Wang (xuwang...@gmail.com) muttered:
> My goal is to get the message ID from a message I just sent. One way I
> am thinking of doing this is copying a message to a temporary file
> (via FCC) and then getting its message ID with a script. Is this
> possible?
On 20.06.15 15:18, Will Yardley wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 08:25:39PM +1000, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> > ISTM that you're painting it more complex than the reality. It is easier
> > than the above with the original simpler presentation, where each
> > attribution begins at the top of its own
On 20.06.15 23:22, Chuck Martin wrote:
> Actually, that can be ambiguous. For example:
>
> Ian> .
> Herbet> ...
> Ian> .
> Herbet> ...
>
> Is the second "Ian>" line a response to the first "Herbet>" line, or
> did Herbet reply to two different parts of the same message from Ian,
> trimmi
On 15-06-20 12:37:06, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> jonas hedman wrote:
> > "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> >Content-Disposition: inline
> >Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> >
> >Secret =E5=E4=F6 =C5=C4=D6"
>
> As the header shows, the =E5 characters are quo
On 15-06-21 09:36:53, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> On 21.06.2015, jonas hedman wrote:
>
> > I'm from Sweden and I occasionally communicate with other swedish people
> > using pgp and I've stumbled upon this problem:
> > If I encrypt a message containg any of the swedish letters "åÅäÄöÖ"
> > using inline
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 02:42:25PM +0200, jonas hedman wrote:
I think I have to convince my friends to get decent email clients =)
Hey, at least you have managed to get them to try and use encryption!
My friends and family can't be bothered. :-(
--
John
I would like to make the following index macro work in the pager as
well:
This works just fine in the index, but fails in the pager if there
exists an unread message directly after the current thread to be read,
because goes back one message and thereby marks the
displayed (unread) message
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 06:41:05PM +1000, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> On 20.06.15 15:18, Will Yardley wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 08:25:39PM +1000, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> > > ISTM that you're painting it more complex than the reality. It is easier
> > > than the above with the original si
* On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 03:59PM +0200 Matthias Vallentin (vallen...@icir.org)
muttered:
> I would like to make the following index macro work in the pager as
> well:
>
>
>
> fails in the pager if there exists an unread message directly after
> the current thread to be read,
> because goes b
* On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 06:38PM +0200 I (tatg...@gmail.com) muttered:
> * On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 03:59PM +0200 Matthias Vallentin (vallen...@icir.org)
> muttered:
> macro index ,foo
> macro pager ,foo2 \
>
It's by far easier, no need for if resolve is unset.
macro index,pager ,foo ' set my_resol
* On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 06:47PM +0200 I (tatg...@gmail.com) muttered:
> * On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 06:38PM +0200 I (tatg...@gmail.com) muttered:
> > macro pager ,foo2 \
> >
>
> macro index,pager ,foo ' set my_resolve=$resolve\
> unset resolve\
> set resolve=$my_resolve' "read thread and go to
> next
On 21.06.2015, jonas hedman wrote:
> I think I have to convince my friends to get decent email clients =)
A lot of people I communicate with use Thunderbird. You can rest
assured that it will properly decrypt gpg-encrypted emails, and it's
not too hard to handle either.
> macro index,pager ,foo ' set my_resolve=$resolve\
> unset resolve\
> set resolve=$my_resolve'\
> "read thread and display next unread message"
>
> Now then, I did try to make no mistake this time.
Indeed, it works like a charm. (Clever use of resolve, BTW!)
Matthias
* On 20 Jun 2015, Chuck Martin wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 08:49:36PM +1000, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> > form. If it is the:
> >
> > "Ian> .
> > Herbet> ... "
> >
> > form, than that's no harder than following a straight line. I've never
> > heard of that being deprecated, though I've
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 04:05:44PM -0500, David Champion wrote:
> * On 20 Jun 2015, Chuck Martin wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 08:49:36PM +1000, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> > > form. If it is the:
> > >
> > > "Ian> .
> > > Herbet> ... "
> > >
> > > form, than that's no harder than follo
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 4:22 AM, Michael Tatge wrote:
> * On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 11:53PM -0400 Xu Wang (xuwang...@gmail.com) muttered:
>> My goal is to get the message ID from a message I just sent. One way I
>> am thinking of doing this is copying a message to a temporary file
>> (via FCC) and then
On 2015-06-21 17:17 -0400, Fred Smith wrote:
> But, I was wondering how one sets up those other methods in Mutt? Am
> I overlooking something in the manual? (most likely, I am...)
I don't think you are.
I do it by using Emacs (via the emacsclient program) as my outgoing
message editor, triggerin
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 11:53:40PM -0400, Xu Wang wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> My goal is to get the message ID from a message I just sent. One way I
> am thinking of doing this is copying a message to a temporary file
> (via FCC) and then getting its message ID with a script. Is this
> possible?
You c
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 11:28 PM, Chris Bannister
wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 11:53:40PM -0400, Xu Wang wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> My goal is to get the message ID from a message I just sent. One way I
>> am thinking of doing this is copying a message to a temporary file
>> (via FCC) and then
20 matches
Mail list logo
