On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 08:58:06AM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> I just tried running mutt 'remotely' by mounting ~/.muttrc and my main
> mail directory ~/Mail using sshfs and running a local copy of mutt.
> This makes handling attachments and HTML E-Mail much faster and easier
> than running mutt on
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 01:31:57PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 08:58:06AM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> > I just tried running mutt 'remotely' by mounting ~/.muttrc and my main
> > mail directory ~/Mail using sshfs and running a local copy of mutt.
> > This makes handling att
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 07:29:52PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 01:31:57PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> > You're probably better off using (local) IMAP over SSH with your Mutt
> > mailboxes. That is, you can ssh into your mail server and run imapd
> > locally (rather than ha
On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 10:02:38AM +0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 11:16:25AM +1300, martin f krafft wrote:
> Native support for multipart/alternative composition isn't in my todo list.
> However, I do have a plan to allow external filter generation of the
> alternative.
El día lunes, octubre 28, 2019 a las 03:59:01p. m. -0500, Derek Martin escribió:
> FWIW, my two biggest wishlist items for Mutt are:
>
> 1. the ability to create and send at least simple HTML messages, with
>or without multipart alternatives, specifically for basic text
>formatting (bold,
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 10:06:18PM +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día lunes, octubre 28, 2019 a las 03:59:01p. m. -0500, Derek Martin
> escribió:
>
> > FWIW, my two biggest wishlist items for Mutt are:
> >
> > 1. the ability to create and send at least simple HTML messages, with
> >or wit
El día lunes, octubre 28, 2019 a las 04:50:40p. m. -0500, Derek Martin escribió:
> > FWIW, I (as a mutt user for 15++ years) do not need this. Thanks
>
> Perhaps not, but the fact that it keeps coming up here is pretty clear
> indication that it's a feature that would be useful to a lot of
> peop
Regarding the following, written by "Matthias Apitz" on 2019-10-28 at 23:11 Uhr
+0100:
Well, do you speak for you or for a 'lot of people'? Who they are?
I speak only for my own interests (as I said: I do not need this).
Matthias, any such feature would of course be optional, and probably
def
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 11:11:31PM +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
Well, do you speak for you or for a 'lot of people'? Who they are?
I speak only for my own interests (as I said: I do not need this).
Talking for myself, I really don't need point 1 (composing of HTML
messages), but number 2, open
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 06:33:19PM -0400, José María Mateos wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 11:11:31PM +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > Well, do you speak for you or for a 'lot of people'? Who they are?
> > I speak only for my own interests (as I said: I do not need this).
>
> Talking for myself,
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 10:40:16PM +, Chris Green wrote:
Isn't that handled by your terminal program? Mine certainly allows
one to right click on any URL to open it.
Not if the URL spans several lines. I think it's a common issue across
several terminal programs and last time I read about
Regarding the following, written by "Chris Green" on 2019-10-28 at 22:40 Uhr
+:
Isn't that handled by your terminal program? Mine certainly allows
one to right click on any URL to open it.
rxvt-unicode also has an extension ("matcher") that allows you to
select and open URLs using the ke
Hi Kevin,
Thanks for sharing your thoughts and plans on this. This all reads
really well, and I think it would go most of the way towards the
ideal solution.
I have a couple of points/questions about some of the things you
propose:
If there were an error sending, the alternative would be s
On Tue 29 Oct 2019 12:04,
martin f krafft put forth the proposition:
> Regarding the following, written by "Chris Green" on 2019-10-28 at 22:40 Uhr
> +:
> > Isn't that handled by your terminal program? Mine certainly allows
> > one to right click on any URL to open it.
>
> rxvt-unicode also
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 00:10:09 +, Dave Woodfall wrote:
> Urlview handles long and short links just fine. I've been using it
> for over 10 years.
One issue I have with it is that context is lost. Marketing emails today
tend to be massive strings with embedded IDs in them. Telling one from
an
> 2. The ability to natively display a subset of HTML (the same subset)
>with the ability to trigger links to open in a browser (or perhaps
>execute an arbitrary configured command). Modern terminal windows
>can handle all of the formatting required to do just this much...
elinks -dum
El día martes, octubre 29, 2019 a las 11:19:43a. m. +1300, martin f krafft
escribió:
> Regarding the following, written by "Matthias Apitz" on 2019-10-28 at 23:11
> Uhr +0100:
> >Well, do you speak for you or for a 'lot of people'? Who they are?
> >I speak only for my own interests (as I said:
Regarding the following, written by "Dave Woodfall" on 2019-10-29 at 00:10 Uhr
+:
Urlview handles long and short links just fine. I've been using it
for over 10 years.
Yes, it does. I think Chris' and José's points were more about
requiring an external tool to provide functionality which
El día lunes, octubre 28, 2019 a las 06:33:19p. m. -0400, José María Mateos
escribió:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 11:11:31PM +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> >Well, do you speak for you or for a 'lot of people'? Who they are?
> >I speak only for my own interests (as I said: I do not need this).
>
>
October 29, 2019 8:38 AM, "martin f krafft" wrote:
> Regarding the following, written by "Dave Woodfall" on 2019-10-29 at 00:10
> Uhr +:
>
>> Urlview handles long and short links just fine. I've been using it
>> for over 10 years.
>
> Yes, it does. I think Chris' and José's points were mor
Regarding the following, written by “雨宫恋叶” on 2019-10-29 at 00:41 Uhr +:
For this, I think we should design a pager for that purpose.
Urlview could probably be extended accordingly. It’d still be disruptive. Imagine reading a long email, and 75% down you encounter a link you want to follow.
Matthias Apitz writes:
> So, run mutt in an unicode-rxvt terminal. It presents URLs underlined
> and click-able. I do so and sometimes I do hate it: you click into your
Definitely not by default. I'm using rxvt-unicode, and I've tried
the "matcher" and "selection" extensions but neither one worked
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 12:41:44PM +1300, martin f krafft wrote:
Script output would be the content-type, a blank line, then the
generated content.
This makes me itch, but I cannot really devise a better approach. I
want to say that the script needs to return the complete MIME part,
including
23 matches
Mail list logo