Re: Corruption still there (was: Re: [Announce] Mutt-1.2.2 is out.)

2000-06-21 Thread CaT
was > incredibly stupid. Well the error appears to be gone. Tried thesame thing on my mailbox again and this time it left a mailbox with the right number of msgs deleted. Soo. I believe it's time to release mutt 1.2.3 8) -- CaT ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) URL

Re: Corruption still there (was: Re: [Announce] Mutt-1.2.2 is out.)

2000-06-21 Thread CaT
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 01:37:45PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote: > On 2000-06-21 21:13:10 +1000, CaT wrote: > > > Bug still there. > > *sigh* I hoped to have that one fixed. At least, it > appeared to be from my own tests. > > Just a question: Did mutt leave

Corruption still there (was: Re: [Announce] Mutt-1.2.2 is out.)

2000-06-21 Thread CaT
er: ---Mutt: /var/spool/mail/damien [Msgs:6417 Old:5469 52M]---(reverse-m Bug still there. Compilation environment: libc 2.1.3 egcs-1.1.2 (the versions I initially complained about were compiled with gcc 2.95.2) binutils 2.9.5.0.42 ./configure --prefix=/usr --enable

Re: Why mutt is the best mail program?

2000-06-15 Thread CaT
ow I'm asking You. Unless I'm mistaken, pine loads the entire mailbox into memory while mutt only loads in the headers, thereby making it friendlier in a multiuser environment. I'd wait for 1.2.1 before getting it installed tho due to a bug that's getting

Re: Results of corruption test on 1.2 (was: Re: mailbox corruption and mutt)

2000-06-12 Thread CaT
On Mon, Jun 12, 2000 at 09:17:48AM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote: > On 2000-06-12 15:46:03 +1000, CaT wrote: > > > Which version of mutt should I try to see if I can > > reporduce this? I've noticed there have been > > official-looking patches about and wanna see if

Re: Results of corruption test on 1.2 (was: Re: mailbox corruption and mutt)

2000-06-11 Thread CaT
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 11:53:51PM +1000, CaT wrote: > On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 11:43:22AM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote: > > On 2000-06-05 10:29:16 +1000, CaT wrote: > > > > > Before attempt: > > > > > -%-Mutt: /tmp/damien.work [Msgs:5492 New:12 Old:1176 P

Re: mailbox corruption and mutt

2000-06-05 Thread CaT
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 08:18:56PM +0200, clemensF wrote: > > CaT: > > > Local filesystem for all mailboxes. and erm.. disjunct? > > sorry, i could not find the word and threw in what came up. i mean, can > you guarante that no links, chrooted environments or w

Re: Gzip Mailboxes

2000-06-05 Thread CaT
then look at the temp file. Does this mean mutt qould keep a decompressed copy of the mailbox about while it was opened? Or does it keep the decompressed mailbox about just when scanning for headers or does it just pipe the decompressed mailbox and not care for temp files with it in? -- CaT ([EMA

Re: Results of corruption test on 1.2 (was: Re: mailbox corruption and mutt)

2000-06-05 Thread CaT
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 11:43:22AM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote: > On 2000-06-05 10:29:16 +1000, CaT wrote: > > > Before attempt: > > > -%-Mutt: /tmp/damien.work [Msgs:5492 New:12 Old:1176 Post:1 36M]---(reverse- > > > After attempt: > > > ---Mutt: /var/

Results of corruption test on 1.2 (was: Re: mailbox corruption and mutt)

2000-06-04 Thread CaT
On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 07:29:53PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote: > CaT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sun, 04 Jun 2000: > > Ok.. NOW I'm using 1.2. Grr. Compiled 1.2, went to play > > with my bros on their nintendo, came back and forgot I > > didn't install :

Re: mailbox corruption and mutt

2000-06-04 Thread CaT
On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 09:52:48PM +0200, clemensF wrote: > > CaT: > > > I'm using several mutts but they're all on a different mailbox. > > mailboxes accessed by some nfs? really every mailbox disjunct? Local filesystem for all mailboxes. and erm.. disju

Re: mailbox corruption and mutt

2000-06-04 Thread CaT
On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 11:08:57AM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote: > On 2000-06-04 16:32:44 +1000, CaT wrote: > > > for example this is one message in the mailbox that is > > currupt. Not that it consists of virtually missing > > headers and that it is two messages concat

Re: mailbox corruption and mutt

2000-06-04 Thread CaT
On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 11:08:57AM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote: > On 2000-06-04 16:32:44 +1000, CaT wrote: > > > for example this is one message in the mailbox that is > > currupt. Not that it consists of virtually missing > > headers and that it is two messages concat

Re: mailbox corruption and mutt

2000-06-04 Thread CaT
On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 11:19:46AM +0200, clemensF wrote: > are you using several mutt windows in a gui or mbox formatted mailboxes > without locked access? I'm using several mutts but they're all on a different mailbox. -- CaT ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: mailbox corruption and mutt

2000-06-04 Thread CaT
On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 12:38:35PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > CaT proclaimed on mutt-users that: > > >Ok. Not to be faceatous(sp?) or anything... just being curious :) What > >will this prove/solve/whatnot? I may have missed out on a bit of info > >in that,

Re: mailbox corruption and mutt

2000-06-04 Thread CaT
On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 12:13:38PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > CaT proclaimed on mutt-users that: > > >Mutt does corrupt if it cannot recover from this situation without > >corrupting the mailbox. It's not that the mailbox is saved, intact > > It shoul

Re: mailbox corruption and mutt

2000-06-03 Thread CaT
On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 11:49:40AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > CaT proclaimed on mutt-users that: > > >I don't suppose I have a hope in getting any sort of responce to this? > > Let me see .. > > >It is kinda important and I'd be more then ha

Re: mailbox corruption and mutt

2000-06-03 Thread CaT
23, 2000 at 09:23:14PM +1000, CaT wrote: > On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 10:10:07AM +1000, CaT wrote: > > well I just had my mailbox corrupted for the second time by mutt 8( > > > > this happens when I try to quit, mutt finds there's not enough room > > in /tmp and so doesn

Re: mailbox corruption and mutt

2000-05-23 Thread CaT
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 10:10:07AM +1000, CaT wrote: > well I just had my mailbox corrupted for the second time by mutt 8( > > this happens when I try to quit, mutt finds there's not enough room > in /tmp and so doesn't let me. What winds up happening is that once >

mailbox corruption and mutt

2000-05-22 Thread CaT
iously), glibc 2.1.3 (but it happened with 2.1.2). The mailbox is 47meg in size with 7624 msgs. -- CaT ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) URL: http://www.zip.com.au/dev/null 'He had position, but I was determined to score.' -- Worf, DS9, Season 5: 'Let He Who Is Without Sin...'

Re: unable to get mutt_dotlock to work

2000-03-08 Thread CaT
l /var/spool/ > drwxrwxr-t3 root root 1024 Mar 8 16:56 mail > > $ ls -l /usr/bin/mutt_dotlock > -rwxr-sr-x1 root mail 7108 Feb 18 07:54 > /usr/bin/mutt_dotlock > > Are these right? Nope. chgrp mail /var/spool/mail -- CaT ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: Color xterm??

1999-11-13 Thread CaT
;ls" with color, then mutt's got to > work too. I have installed ncurses-5.0 and that is not helping > either. > > Any pointers to get colors working... Try: export TERM=exterm-color if using bash. > Subba Rao > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://pws.prserv.net/truema

locking hassle with mutt 1.0

1999-10-31 Thread CaT
h anything other then dorlocking tho. I tried all sorts of conbos of the two other methods and things only worked when I gave mutt_dotlock permission to write to /var/spool/mail. my system is: gcc 2.95.2, binutils 2.9.5.0.16, glibc 2.1.2, linux 2.2.12 help? :) -- CaT ([EMAIL

Re: Please use the 'L' command to send mail

1999-10-27 Thread CaT
Chris Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Please use the 'L' command to send mail Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/0.96.6i In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Precedence: bulk -- CaT ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) URL: h