Re: Happy Little Vegemite

2000-03-01 Thread Chuck Dale
Wrote Eugene Lee on Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 04:50:09AM -0800: > I don't know if this division of labor will work for all but the most > simplest configurations. An example would be a complex set of folder > hooks where colors, key bindings, save hooks, and other settings. > Now imagine you had diffe

Re: Happy Little Vegemite

2000-03-01 Thread Chuck Dale
Wrote Matthew Hawkins on Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 11:46:58PM +1100: > On 2000-03-01 23:09:22 +1100, Chuck Dale wrote: > > > > > > The problem (as I see it) is that .muttrc goes against the principles > > which Mutt is following. Particularly in modularisation. The .mut

Re: Happy Little Vegemite

2000-03-01 Thread Chuck Dale
> They *are* settable within the interface. Just type ":set " > (and keep repeating pressing tab until you get to the setting you want > to change). :-) Of course it won't save the settings > > Anyway, all silliness aside, what's different from doing the changes > "within the interface" as

Re: Threading Characters

2000-03-01 Thread Chuck Dale
Wrote Thomas Roessler on Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 12:05:34PM +0100: > Funny. Some of the stuff I'm seeing in "Clean" heavily reminds me > of Atari's character set used with their STs, although other things > definately looked different, for instance the shape of the "a". > (Actually, there seems to b

Threading Characters

2000-03-01 Thread Chuck Dale
Dear List. Using my favourite terminal font, Clean (Schumacher), the threading arrows are all wrong and turn out as little musical notes etc. This font is installed with the XFree86-75dpi-fonts RPM on my RH6.0 system. Is there any way to use different characters for the threading arrows that w

Re: Folder Behaviour

2000-02-29 Thread Chuck Dale
Hi Mikko, Wrote Mikko Hänninen on Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 09:56:12PM +0200: > Hello Chuck, > > Chuck Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 01 Mar 2000: > > 1. Is is possible to remove the roughly half-second wait while "Mailbox > > is unchanged" flashe

Re: Happy Little Vegemite

2000-02-29 Thread Chuck Dale
Wrote Mikko Hänninen on Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 09:34:37PM +0200: > This would probably benefit from having more explanation of the mail > sending process in the Mutt docs. I don't agree that Mutt should give > specific pointers to sendmail documentation, because even though > sendmail is the curren

Folder Switching

2000-02-29 Thread Chuck Dale
Oh and another thing I forgot to ask: 5. Would it possible to have a next-folder and previous-folder command in Mutt somewhere so I could move back and forward between folders with a single key? Also next-new-folder would be good, to go to the next folder with new mail. Actually a command to g

Folder Behaviour

2000-02-29 Thread Chuck Dale
Hi again, The folder interface is annoying me a little in Mutt and am looking for help in configuring it further. At the moment I use this macro to switch between folders: macro index M "c?\t" macro pager M "c?\t" 1. Is is possible to remove the roughly half-second wait while "Mailbox is unchan

Re: lotus notes

2000-02-29 Thread Chuck Dale
Hi Arnaud, Here we go already, a question about sendmail setup. Or maybe not worth a try.. The reason Netscape would deliver your mail but Mutt wouldn't is that Netscape handles all parts of the message sending for you, where Mutt simply hands your message off to sendmail which is running on you

Happy Little Vegemite

2000-02-29 Thread Chuck Dale
Dear Mutts, You've got one happy Mutt convert here. At least for the moment. After half a day grappling with getting things configured nicely I like it. I had two main gripes with getting Mutt going. I'll give some recommendations for how I see the user experience could be made easier. Please d