I saw some recent postings about how people control spam. I thought I
would pass along my perl script that I use to help with this. Some
things are needed in order for this to work.
1. freebsd (although certainly easily modified for others)
2. perl
3. procmail
4. sendmail using anti-spam
5. roo
I have many email files with over 100,000 messages and counting.
However, I cannot get Mutt to indicate over 99,999 messages. It simply
chops off the last number making it appear that I have much less. Is
there a way to expand this field to handle very large mail volume?
Since Mutt is one of the
On Sun, May 21, 2000 at 08:37:21PM -0300, Richard Spencer wrote:
> When I began using Linux I started with
> Red Hat 6.0 and used KDE's KMail for a MUA.
>
> At that time I was checking 2 email accounts
> for mail, which was easy to implement, but I wasn't
> thrilled about the lack of configurabil
On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 07:36:06AM -0400, Hall Stevenson wrote:
> > >> By the way, where are you finding netiquette rules for email? I am
> > >> curious.
> > >
> > >The standard reference is RFC 1855. (One place you can find this is
> > >http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html .) As with most RFC
31AM +0200, Gerhard den Hollander wrote:
> * Corey G. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000523 02:06]:
> > Sounds fair enough.
>
> According to proper netiquette
> - your reply should FOLLOW the text you're replying to
> putting the reply before the text is a M$ mailer induced br
be more than happy to write a better explanation if someone
really wants me to for the documentation. I only want to make Mutt
better like everyone else.
--
Regards,
Corey
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 08:06:09AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
> Corey --
>
> ...and then Corey G. sa
03:28:40AM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> Corey G. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 22 May 2000:
> > I have unset metoo in the .muttrc but when I reply to a message it still
> > persists on including myself if I was in the original "To:". At this
> > point I a
Sounds fair enough.
Thanks.
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 02:33:00AM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> Corey G. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 22 May 2000:
> > When I reply to an email my signature is getting placed at the very
> > bottom of the email instead of at the end of m
I have unset metoo in the .muttrc but when I reply to a message it still
persists on including myself if I was in the original "To:". At this
point I am wondering how Mutt knows what my address really is because
it's not defined in .muttrc.
Am I missing something easy here?
Thanks,
--
Best Re
When I reply to an email my signature is getting placed at the very
bottom of the email instead of at the end of my reply. Does anyone know
of a way to change the location?
--
Best Regards,
Corey
Chris,
When you have listed your mailboxes via whatever command you bound it
too, for me it's "l", like Pine, you can hit tab to list those mailboxes
that you indicated in the .muttrc file as explicit mailboxes to check.
When I hit "tab" in this menu, it does not show any mailboxes that were
not
It seems that Mutt wants to leave temp files hanging around in /tmp.
This confuses me because I have the following in my .muttrc.
set tmpdir = ~/tmp
However, I continue to find files lingering around in /tmp. Even
though these files are read only for myself it's generally good to clean
up after
I put this in my .muttrc for starting vim and it handles word wraps
great.
set editor = 'vim -c "set tw=72" +1'
Corey
On Mon, May 08, 2000 at 08:08:37PM -0500, Kelly Scroggins wrote:
> I've been trying to figure the linebreak thing out. I'm sorry about that.
> I'm trying to use vim's textwidth
Being somewhat new in Mutt I can only say that I had similar problems
with auto-view in my .muttrc file. I was able alleviate these problems
by simply listing each auto-view entry separately in the .muttrc file.
You might try putting it in separately since it seems to be missing it
for some reas
Mutt Group,
I am looking for what I would call a nice color scheme for Mutt. I
currently use the scheme listed below but I would like to see what other
people have come up with. I tinkered around but I have very little
artistic ability.
color attachment brightmagenta black
col
this was also suggested.
Corey
On Sat, May 06, 2000 at 03:08:18PM -0400, Bennett Todd wrote:
> 2000-05-06-15:02:35 Corey G.:
> > I must be living in the dark because I never heard of w3m until I saw
> > this thread. What is the opinion on how it works verse lynx? Are
>
I must be living in the dark because I never heard of w3m until I saw
this thread. What is the opinion on how it works verse lynx? Are
there any major benefits in using one over the other?
On Sat, May 06, 2000 at 11:27:35AM -0500, Ronny Haryanto wrote:
> On 06-May-2000, Nollaig MacKenzie wrot
Does anyone know of a way to change the "From:" address when sending an email. I know
of a way
in Pine but have been unsuccessful with Mutt. I need this because I send email from a
Unix box
with an ID that does not exist on our real email production system. I do not like
using "Reply-To" bec
Would changing your umask work?
On Thu, May 04, 2000 at 06:35:34PM +0100, Struan Donald wrote:
> Is there some way that I can change these from the current 600 to
> something less restrictive? I looked through the manual and there
> doesn't seem to be any option in there for changing them.
>
> t
19 matches
Mail list logo
