Re: Why is http address attachet to header?

2002-03-29 Thread Jerome De Greef
* Shawn McMahon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: begin quoting what Patrik Modesto said on Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 10:24:42AM +0100: I create new message, then to the first empty line under header i write http://www.something.com and send this mail. This address is send as a part of email's header

Re: New Mail While In The Mailbox List View

2002-03-19 Thread Jerome De Greef
* Dean Richard Benson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hi all First time poster, so please be gentle! :) I have just upgraded from Outlook 2000 to Mutt. Using the most recent version and starting mutt via mutt -y to default to the folder list. It shows me which folders have new mail in

Re: New Mail While In The Mailbox List View

2002-03-19 Thread Jerome De Greef
* Michael Tatge ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Jerome De Greef ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: * Dean Richard Benson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I have just upgraded from Outlook 2000 to Mutt. Using the most recent version and starting mutt via mutt -y to default to the folder list

Re: Hook question - making a point

2002-03-18 Thread Jerome De Greef
* Sven Guckes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: * Jerome De Greef [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-16 14:11]: BTW, doesn't ..* do the same as .+ ? it depends. really - it all depends on the language you currently have available. I was talking about Mutt ;) So was I. more specifically, I

Re: Hook question - making a point

2002-03-18 Thread Jerome De Greef
Hi, * Sven Guckes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hi! * Jerome De Greef [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-18 08:18]: send-hook ! . 'my_hdr From: JDG [EMAIL PROTECTED]' try again. does it work now? Nope... send-hook ~t . 'my_hdr From: JDG [EMAIL PROTECTED]' send-hook ! ~t . 'my_hdr

Re: Hook question

2002-03-16 Thread Jerome De Greef
* David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Jerome -- ...and then Jerome De Greef said... % % I think I have the solution: Yay! % % send-hook '~t .*' 'my_hdr From: Jerome De Greef [EMAIL PROTECTED]' % send-hook !'~t .*' 'my_hdr From: Jerome De Greef[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Does

Re: Hook question - making a point

2002-03-16 Thread Jerome De Greef
* Sven Guckes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: * Jerome De Greef [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-16 09:25]: % send-hook '~t .*' 'my_hdr From: JDG [EMAIL PROTECTED]' % send-hook !'~t .*' 'my_hdr From: JDG [EMAIL PROTECTED]' Does this work, or do you think it should? I'd expect that you'd need

Re: Hook question

2002-03-15 Thread Jerome De Greef
I think I have the solution: send-hook '~t .*' 'my_hdr From: Jerome De Greef [EMAIL PROTECTED]' send-hook !'~t .*' 'my_hdr From: Jerome De Greef[EMAIL PROTECTED]' The first hook is used whenever I hit 'r' and there is a 'To:' line followed by any address. The second hook is used when I hit 'F

Hook question

2002-03-14 Thread Jerome De Greef
Hi, I use the nntp patch from vvv. I have folder hooks to change my email for the newsgroups to avoid spam. When i press F to write a follow-up, my address is changed accordingly. Now my question is: is there a way to have my 'normal address' used when I hit 'r' to personnaly reply to a

Re: Hook question

2002-03-14 Thread Jerome De Greef
* Andre Berger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: * Jerome De Greef [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2002-03-14 09:13 -0500: Hi, I use the nntp patch from vvv. I have folder hooks to change my email for the newsgroups to avoid spam. When i press F to write a follow-up, my address is changed accordingly

Re: VVV NNTP patch -- small comment

2001-10-18 Thread Jerome De Greef
* David Champion ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On 2001.10.17, in [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jerome De Greef [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It will only retrieve the groups list once. Then remove all newgroups you don't need from your newsrc file and you're all set. The only disadvantage

Re: Message-ID re-writing

2001-03-23 Thread Jerome De Greef
I don't. -- +---+ | Jerome De Greef | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]| +-+[EMAIL PROTECTED]| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +-+

Re: Message-ID re-writing

2001-03-23 Thread Jerome De Greef
* Jim Breton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 05:44:12PM +0100, Jerome De Greef wrote: RFC 822: [...] This identifier is intended to be machine readable and not necessarily meaningful to humans. [...] That says it all ;) No, it doesn't. The problem

Re: Message-ID re-writing

2001-03-23 Thread Jerome De Greef
* Jim Breton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 06:13:35PM +0100, Jerome De Greef wrote: And what's your problem with it being readable by humans ? I already explained why, several messages ago in my response to Thomas. You know someone counting how many messages you wrote

Re: Still having problems with 8-bit characters and/or locale

2001-03-14 Thread Jerome De Greef
different than usual doesn't mean it's not setup correctly as before we know what system it is we don't know how to setup the locales - /etc/locale.gen doesn't exist on all systems). My 0.5 Euro ;) Jerome -- +---+ | Jerome De Greef | [EMAIL

Re: Getting accented characters etc. to work in mutt pager

2001-02-27 Thread Jerome De Greef
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit" } to transform quoted-printable in my .procmailrc Jerome -- +---+ | Jerome De Greef | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]| +-+[EMAIL

Test - Please ignore...

2001-02-17 Thread Jerome De Greef
Hurm, not received any mail since 02/11... -- +---+ | Jerome De Greef | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]| +-+[EMAIL PROTECTED]| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +-+