x27;unmy_hdr From:'
send-hook '~C cc' 'my_hdr From: Martin Baehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'
and first tests show that it seems to work fine even with $reverse_name
(i'll probably have to spice up the regexp some more, but i'll see)
thank you yo much!
greeti
:
#send-hook '.' 'unmy_hdr From:'
#send-hook '~f cc' 'my_hdr From: Martin Baehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'
#send-hook '.' 'unmy_hdr Cc:'
#send-hook '~f cc' 'my_hdr Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
send-hook '.' '
On Wed, Nov 10, 1999 at 07:09:44PM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> > I have some letters that comes to me with "To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]". Every time
> > i responding this message i need to add "CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]". Now i do this
> > by hands. Is there any way to do it automatically?
> Does using g
the whole idea works if i do this:
send-hook '.' 'unmy_hdr Xx:'
send-hook '~f cc' 'my_hdr Xx: [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
i also tried to remove cc from alternates and:
send-hook '.' 'unmy_hdr From:'
send-hook '~f cc' 'my_hd
On Thu, Jul 15, 1999 at 08:57:16PM +0200, Marco Goetze wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 16 1999, at 00:13 +0700, m4v3r1ck wrote:
> >Just noticed that mutt 0.96.3i adds User-Agent header to outgoing message.
> "X-Mailer:" has been superceded by "User-Agent:", in compliance with
> some more recent IETF draft.
On Wed, Jul 14, 1999 at 04:49:04PM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> I get the impression, though, that a lot of "the faithful" don't read /.
> much since the s/n ratio got so bad. Most of the comments seem to be
> newbies. The informal survey of mail headers done a while back by someone
> on this
hi,
i'd like to do something like this:
folder-hook linux-kernel limit '~n 40-'
alternatively i could do something like this:
folder-hook linux-kernel set sort score
but that is not as usefull, because the secondary-order is wrong:
(it is sorted as: 50:jan but i'd like to have: 50:feb
On Mon, Jan 25, 1999 at 05:10:27PM -0800, Joe Rhett wrote:
> Shouldn't defining something with "lists" automagickally make it an alias?
> It would be nice.
if you defined a list say 'mutt-users' how is mutt suppoed to find out
that the alias is supposed to be [EMAIL PROTECTED]?
it would have to h
