Re: Failing to reopen mailbox after SSH tunnel closure

On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 11:25:31AM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > Luck is indeed what I'd call it. I suspect, also, that these other > machines may use different versions of the encryption libraries (ssl, > sasl, etc.) that are more tolerant of being improperly cleaned up. That sounds very plausible

Re: Failing to reopen mailbox after SSH tunnel closure

On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 01:08:01AM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > >That sounds very plausible. To confirm that that's the difference, Is > >there any way I can find out precisely which version of these > >libraries my various installations of mutt are using? [snip] > On MacOSX, you use 'otool -L' i

Re: Display problems in OS X Terminal.app

Some of you may remember me struggling with redraw problems in Terminal.app. On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 10:10:55AM +, Michael Williams wrote: > I'm having redraw problems in OS X's Terminal.app, and would welcome > suggestions or solutions. The screen looks something like t

Signature for new mail/no signature for replies

Hi, I would like to append my signature to new emails (essentially those I start by hitting 'm' in the pager or message view) but do not want a signature for replies (either individual, group, or list replies). I know how to unset signature with a reply hook, but I can't figure out how t

Re: Signature for new mail/no signature for replies

Hi Paul, On 6 Feb 2009, at 02:13, Paul E Condon wrote: I would like to append my signature to new emails (essentially those I start by hitting 'm' in the pager or message view) but do not want a signature for replies (either individual, group, or list replies). I know how to unset signature

Change default "Re: your mail" subject when replying to blank subject

Hi, Is it possible to change the default "Re: your mail" subject that mutt uses when replying to emails that arrive without a subject to something less, er, passive aggressive -- or something in another language? Apologies if this is a FAQ, but it's rather difficult to Google, and I can find no m

Re: Change default "Re: your mail" subject when replying to blank

On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 12:49:38PM -0400, Monte Stevens wrote: > > Is it possible to change the default "Re: your mail" subject that > > mutt uses when replying to emails that arrive without a subject to > > something less, er, passive aggressive -- or something in another > > language? > > You ca

Re: Change default "Re: your mail" subject when replying to blank

On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 03:03:08PM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote: > Doing any more than that to address the very narrow case of "I don't > want to bother changing the reply but I don't like the default", just > seems to me like overkill. You're forgetting "I don't want to bother changing the reply a

Authenticated Exchange SMTP server problem

Hi, I'm trying to get mutt's smtp support to work with my department's new Exchange server. According to the current draft documentation, Thunderbird can be configured as follows: . I have confirmed that this configurati

Re: Authenticated Exchange SMTP server problem

On 18 Sep 2010, at 22:16, Jostein Berntsen wrote: > Does your /var/log/mail gives any more clues? On the client machine? Apparently I don't have one (this is a vanilla mutt build +tokyocabinet running on OS X.

Re: Authenticated Exchange SMTP server problem

On 19 Sep 2010, at 03:26, John J. Foster wrote: >>> Does your /var/log/mail gives any more clues? >> >> On the client machine? Apparently I don't have one (this is a vanilla mutt >> build +tokyocabinet running on OS X. > > it's /private/var/log/mail.log on a MAC /var is symlinked to /private/v

Re: Authenticated Exchange SMTP server problem

On 18 Sep 2010, at 21:20, Michael Williams wrote: > I'm trying to get mutt's smtp support to work with my department's new > Exchange server. > > According to the current draft documentation, Thunderbird can be configured > as follows: > <http://www.phy

Re: Authenticated Exchange SMTP server problem

Hi Brendan, thanks very much for these suggestions. On 19 Sep 2010, at 22:43, Brendan Cully wrote: >> If your mutt was built with --enable-debug (mutt -v will include the >> line +DEBUG if so), you can run mutt -d2 to get a trace of mutt's >> conversation with the SMTP server in ~/.muttdebug0. Th

Re: Authenticated Exchange SMTP server problem

On 19 Sep 2010, at 23:42, Brendan Cully wrote: > try "login" instead of plain. The server is advertising "AUTH NTLM > LOGIN" above. That's it! Thanks very much! -- Mike

Stuck on 97% changing mailboxes

Hi, following on from problems getting a new Exchange 2010 server to play nice with mutt's SMTP support (http://marc.info/?l=mutt-users&m=128493280217503&w=2), I have now encountered a problem with IMAP access to the same server. This problem is unique to mutt and is not displayed by other mail

Re: sending mail directly to MX based on To: addr

On 20 Sep 2010, at 16:36, Matthias Apitz wrote: > Do you know if mutt logs somewhere the SMTP dialog with the remote > server? I found nothing in the docs about... Run "mutt -d2". Server chat is then logged in ~/.muttdebug*. Increase the number 2 to larger numbers for more detail. (This assumes

Re: Stuck on 97% changing mailboxes

On 20 Sep 2010, at 12:30, Michael Williams wrote: > Hi, > > following on from problems getting a new Exchange 2010 server to play nice > with mutt's SMTP support > (http://marc.info/?l=mutt-users&m=128493280217503&w=2), I have now > encountered a problem with

Re: Stuck on 97% changing mailboxes

Hi Michael, thanks for the reply. On 22 Sep 2010, at 15:56, Michael Elkins wrote: >> However, for larger mailboxes, when I attempt to change, mutt only gets as >> far as saying >> >> Fetching message headers... 3320/3391 (97%) >> >> which remains unchanged for ~5 minutes before I give up.

Re: Stuck on 97% changing mailboxes

On 23 Sep 2010, at 19:17, Christian Brabandt wrote: >> 4< * 3700 FETCH (UID 17146 FLAGS (\Seen) INTERNALDATE "23-Sep-2010 09:14:57 >> +0100" RFC822.SIZE 2612 BODY[HEADER.FIELDS (DATE FROM SUBJECT TO CC >> MESSAGE-ID REFERENCES CONTENT-TYPE CONTENT-DESCRIPTION IN-REPLY-TO REPLY-TO >> LINES LIST-

Re: Stuck on 97% changing mailboxes

On 23 Sep 2010, at 23:13, Michael Elkins wrote: > Yes, this is the problem. Mutt expects to see a FETCH response for each > message the server says EXISTS. The IMAP standard requires that no "holes" > exist in the message sequence numbers, and mutt is not prepared to handle > them. I hope it

Re: How to redirect a maildir open, and/or how to execute external commands

On 28 Sep 2010, at 17:02, fe...@crowfix.com wrote: > The only real drawback to this is that now that I have discovered > sidebar and the amazing things which mutt's commands can do, I think > there must be something better than running this special mutt wrapper > script to do these steps. I'd like