priority of send-hooks and folder-hooks

2011-05-16 Thread Thorsten Scherf
I did some signature configuration based on folder-hooks and send-hooks. As default send-hook, I've choosen a specific signature that changes based on different recipient addresses. I now want to change the signature also based on specific holders, but it looks like the config I did for send-hooks

Re: removing signatures from incoming mails

2011-02-25 Thread Thorsten Scherf
On [Thu, 24.02.2011 23:35], Andreas Kalex wrote: Hi, to filter not only signatures but long TOFU sequences too, I am using t-prot, which is doing a good job. http://www.escape.de/~tolot/mutt/ That's exactly what I was looking for. Thanks a lot. Cheers, Thorsten * Thorsten Scherf

removing signatures from incoming mails

2011-02-24 Thread Thorsten Scherf
Hey, some mailinglists using freemail providers put an automatic signature to all mails from the lists. How do I have to configure mutt to get rid of the signature from all mails within a specfic folder? Cheers, Thorsten

Re: How can I intergare mutt with Gnome?

2009-02-11 Thread Thorsten Scherf
On [Wed, 11.02.2009 16:23], Andrey Zhidenkov wrote: Can I integrate mutt with Gnome? For example, when I click on e-mail adress in browser (firefox), I would like to open mutt with new mail blank. System->Preferences->Personal->Preferred Applications- Happy Day. Thorsten smime.p7s Descrip

Re: macro question

2008-08-06 Thread Thorsten Scherf
On [Thu, 07.08.2008 04:39], Michael Kjorling wrote: On 6 Aug 2008 23:32 +0200, by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thorsten Scherf): folder-hook 'INBOX$' \ 'macro pager,index d "+INBOX.Trash"' Have you tried making the regexp '.*INBOX$'? It would be semantically the

macro question

2008-08-06 Thread Thorsten Scherf
Could somebody enlighten me what is wrong with the following macro definition? I have several local IMAP-mailboxes: imap://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/INBOX imap://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/INBOX.Drafts ... in my muttrc I have the following: folder-hook . 'macro index,pager d ' folder-hook 'INBOX$' \ 'macro pa

Re: mutt/offline-mode (imap)

2007-04-25 Thread Thorsten Scherf
On [Tue, 24.04.2007 14:31], Vincent BEFFARA wrote: Hi, is it possible to use mutt in offline mode when using imap? idea is to pass mails to the mta without being connected to the imap server. I am doing something similar on my laptop (Mac OS X, Linux would be similar, and I'm not sure about

bug in 1.5.15

2007-04-24 Thread Thorsten Scherf
Hi, just installed mutt-1.5.15 on my box and noticed that the number of new mails in browser view did not change after I read the mails. this was not the case with 1.5.14, where the number went down to 0 after I read all the new mails in an imap folder? has anybody else noticed this? Happy Day.

mutt/offline-mode (imap)

2007-04-24 Thread Thorsten Scherf
hi, is it possible to use mutt in offline mode when using imap? idea is to pass mails to the mta without being connected to the imap server. Happy Day. Thorsten -- Life is complicated, sendmail.cf reflects this!

Re: saving attachements

2007-04-17 Thread Thorsten Scherf
On [Mon, 16.04.2007 22:58], Przemyslaw Gawronski wrote: Hi is it possible to define a specific folder where all saved attchements goes into? I find these macros useful: macro attach s /home/gawron/attachments/ macro attach S This works great. Thanks. --

Re: saving attachements

2007-04-16 Thread Thorsten Scherf
On [Mon, 16.04.2007 13:46], Kyle Wheeler wrote: On Monday, April 16 at 09:23 PM, quoth Thorsten Scherf: is it possible to define a specific folder where all saved attchements goes into? As in, can you prevent people from saving attachments elsewhere? No. Can you specify a default one? Sure

saving attachements

2007-04-16 Thread Thorsten Scherf
Hi, is it possible to define a specific folder where all saved attchements goes into? Thanks, Thorsten --