References: at all. Wonder
why?
A good reference page about this subject, in my opinion, is:
http://cr.yp.to/immhf/thread.html
--
Timo T. Rajala
or is mutt wrong by not being able to handle it
without this row?
Any comments?
--
Timo T. Rajala
* Timo T. Rajala [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One difference is that the smime-type=enveloped-data; row is missing
from the MS mail. I inserted this row in the MS mail and opened the
mail in mutt: now both signature check and decrypt works.
My question is: Is the MS MUA not following the S
for i386-linux
Anybody who has encountered this little error and knows how to fix it?
Regards,
--
Timo T. Rajala
* Timo T. Rajala [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here is the commands and the output from them:
~$ smime_keys init
Died at /usr/local/bin/smime_keys line 236.
Should have included relevant rows from 'smime_keys', here they are:
231 # directory setup routines
232 #
233
234
235 sub mkdir_recursive
!
--
Timo T. Rajala
files under keys/
and certificates/. That's all, AFAIK.
--
Timo T. Rajala