Daniel --
...and then Daniel Eisenbud said...
% On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 09:37:52PM -0400, David T-G
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
% > Have you seen Cedric Duval's edit_threads patch? It seems that it might
% > be related to some of this sort of thing.
%
% I just looked at it. Cool! I mused at l
On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 09:37:52PM -0400, David T-G
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have you seen Cedric Duval's edit_threads patch? It seems that it might
> be related to some of this sort of thing.
I just looked at it. Cool! I mused at least once that this feature
would be nice, but I never di
Daniel --
...and then Daniel Eisenbud said...
% On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 02:07:44PM +0200, Matthias LOITSCH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
% > On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 07:29:20AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
% > > Are you sure that mutt doesn't recognize it? If the References: field
...
% > > that mutt ha
On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 02:07:44PM +0200, Matthias LOITSCH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 07:29:20AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
> > Are you sure that mutt doesn't recognize it? If the References: field
> > contains only Message-IDs from messages not in your mailbox, then mutt
Matthias --
...and then Matthias LOITSCH said...
% On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 07:29:20AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
% > Matthias --
% > %
% > % so i looked in the header of those emails, and found that the emails
% > % which aren't recognized as an reply don't have the In-Reply-To and
% > % the Refere
On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 07:29:20AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
> Matthias --
> %
> % so i looked in the header of those emails, and found that the emails
> % which aren't recognized as an reply don't have the In-Reply-To and
> % the References field. Ok, there is nothing to do.
>
> Well, you could u
Matthias --
...and then Matthias LOITSCH said...
% I'm sure that everybody here knows the problem that some email programs
% don't know how to reply correctly to a mail... So the threads are
% interrupted or shown something like this:
% '*>
Oh, yeah :-)
%
% so i looked in the header of those
I'm sure that everybody here knows the problem that some email programs
don't know how to reply correctly to a mail... So the threads are
interrupted or shown something like this:
'*>
so i looked in the header of those emails, and found that the emails
which aren't recognized as an reply don't ha
