Am Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 03:00:19PM +0100, Vegard Svanberg schrieb:
> No configuration, really, I just start screen and start each mutt
> instance in a new window. No concurrency problems as each mutt handles a
> different folder (and, as mentioned, I use IMAP with Dovecot anyway).
thanks. I never
Am Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 07:52:07AM -0500, Patrick Shanahan schrieb:
> I use tmux instead of screen, but no need or personal preference to start
> mutt in "read-only" mode. I am the only user of mutt on my system so I
> don't worry about another session changes happening while I am using mutt.
ah
* Igor Sosa Mayor [2014-02-18 13:33]:
> a little bit OT, but could you please tell me how you have configured
> screen and mutt? Are you starting mutt with mutt -R?
No configuration, really, I just start screen and start each mutt
instance in a new window. No concurrency problems as each mutt ha
* Igor Sosa Mayor [02-18-14 07:34]:
> Am Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 08:42:53AM +0100, Vegard Svanberg schrieb:
> > I use screen with multiple instances of Mutt, to avoid having to
> > change/re-open different mailboxes all the time. That also has the
> > advantage I can just screen -r from any computer
Am Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 08:42:53AM +0100, Vegard Svanberg schrieb:
> I use screen with multiple instances of Mutt, to avoid having to
> change/re-open different mailboxes all the time. That also has the
> advantage I can just screen -r from any computer to bring up the e-mail
> environment.
a litt
* Alan Mackenzie [2014-02-17 21:04]:
> > mbox or maildir?
>
> mbox. I've never used maildir, but it strikes me that it would be
> slower, not counting the initial 12s loading time.
I'm currently at 294000 and use Maildir, but with Dovecot/IMAP in
between. It's very fast, and I've only run into
* Cameron Simpson [02-17-14 18:23]:
[...]
> Currently I use mbox for:
>
> - all my archive folders (I have 'd' mapped to archive)
>
> - my inbox (considering switching back to maildir)
>
> - many of my other folders
>
> It is a trade off, but with the heder cache, maildirs tend to be
>
On 17Feb2014 19:58, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 08:42:16PM +0100, bastian-muttu...@t6l.de wrote:
> > On 17Feb14 18:50 +, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> > > My inbox has now reached the grand total of 100,000 messages (_exactly_
> > > 100,000, coincidentally enough). This is part
with mutt, wouldn't be without it..
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Ole Olsen"
To: ; "Alan Mackenzie"
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 9:22 PM
Subject: Re: 100,000 messages, and counting.
Split between mailboxes and logrotate your mailboxes too(with a custom
Message -
From: "Michael Ole Olsen"
To: ; "Alan Mackenzie"
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 9:22 PM
Subject: Re: 100,000 messages, and counting.
Split between mailboxes and logrotate your mailboxes too(with a custom
script that checks size and does stuff to it)
I only
mbox 5 years later, even slower than before :)
- Original Message -
From: "Alan Mackenzie"
To:
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 8:58 PM
Subject: Re: 100,000 messages, and counting.
Hi, Bastian.
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 08:42:16PM +0100, bastian-muttu...@t6l.de wrote:
On 17Feb1
Hi, Bastian.
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 08:42:16PM +0100, bastian-muttu...@t6l.de wrote:
> On 17Feb14 18:50 +, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> > My inbox has now reached the grand total of 100,000 messages (_exactly_
> > 100,000, coincidentally enough). This is partly a result of me being
> > subscribe
On 17Feb14 18:50 +, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> My inbox has now reached the grand total of 100,000 messages (_exactly_
> 100,000, coincidentally enough). This is partly a result of me being
> subscribed to too many mailing lists, and partly of me not getting
> around to clearing things out.
mbo
Hi, mutt!
My inbox has now reached the grand total of 100,000 messages (_exactly_
100,000, coincidentally enough). This is partly a result of me being
subscribed to too many mailing lists, and partly of me not getting
around to clearing things out.
(Yes, I know I could do clever things to split
14 matches
Mail list logo
