Re: Bold text

2002-01-21 Thread David Champion
On 2002.01.21, in <20020121164625.GB2845@neuromancer>, "giorgian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 12:35:15PM -0600, David Champion wrote: > > This message is in enriched text. Here's some text in boldfaced type. > > Here's italic. You can also do formatting -- you can

Re: Bold text

2002-01-21 Thread giorgian
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 12:35:15PM -0600, David Champion wrote: > This message is in enriched text. Here's some text in boldfaced type. > Here's italic. You can also do formatting -- you can everything works for me (mutt 1.3.25) but the italic (i saw it underlined) and justified text (which was

Re: Bold text

2002-01-10 Thread Derek D. Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 At some point hitherto, Erika Pacholleck hath spake thusly: > [07.01.02 12:35 -0600] David Champion <-- : > > You could use enriched text. It's documented in RFC 1563: > > ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc1563.txt > > Hey great, thanks for the exam

Re: Bold text

2002-01-10 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
Alas! Erika Pacholleck spake thus: > (I never learn how to find the number out quickly - yes, I know > there is a list, but that one is really long :( ). Do a google search for something like "RFC database", and you should find a search engine for RFCs, which is very handy. In fact, the way thin

Re: Bold text

2002-01-10 Thread Erika Pacholleck
[07.01.02 12:35 -0600] David Champion <-- : > You could use enriched text. It's documented in RFC 1563: > ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc1563.txt > --- [snipped fine examples ] --- Hey great, thanks for the examples and especially the RFC number (I never learn how to find the number out qui

Re: Bold text

2002-01-10 Thread Erika Pacholleck
[08.01.02 13:11 +0100] Nick Wilson <-- : > * Erika Pacholleck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020108 13:09]: > > is the * the same convention for *bold* as the _ is > > is for _underline_ ? > > > vote here: [x] yes [ ] no > I think David mentioned USENET conventions earlier in this post. He was not sure ab

Re: Bold text

2002-01-08 Thread Nick Wilson
* Erika Pacholleck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020108 13:09]: > [07.01.02 10:21 -0500] David T-G <-- : > > ...and then Nick Wilson said... > > % > > % I'll stick with using *bold* like this. It works for me :) > > > > I certainly agree :-) > > I like to add a related question about "conventions": > is

Re: Bold text

2002-01-08 Thread Erika Pacholleck
[07.01.02 10:21 -0500] David T-G <-- : > ...and then Nick Wilson said... > % > % I'll stick with using *bold* like this. It works for me :) > > I certainly agree :-) I like to add a related question about "conventions": is the * the same convention for *bold* as the _ is is for _underline_ ? v

Re: Bold text

2002-01-07 Thread Nick Wilson
* Samuel Padgett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020108 08:39]: > Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I use vim as my editor and can't work out how to make portions of my > > text bold? I know many of you use vim so I hope someone can help. > > Some MUAs will display "a^Ha" (aa) as a bold "a".

Re: Bold text

2002-01-07 Thread Samuel Padgett
Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I use vim as my editor and can't work out how to make portions of my > text bold? I know many of you use vim so I hope someone can help. Some MUAs will display "a^Ha" (aa) as a bold "a". Is this what you mean? Sam

Re: Bold text

2002-01-07 Thread Derek D. Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 At some point hitherto, David Champion hath spake thusly: > This message is in enriched text. Here's some text in boldfaced type. > Here's italic. You can also do formatting -- you can These worked for me (using mutt 1.3.22.1) > >

Re: Bold text

2002-01-07 Thread David Champion
On 2002.01.07, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Nick Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes I mean /like/ HTML, but *not* HTML as I dump anything of nature > also. I guess my understanding of real ASCII text is mistaken. I thought > that because I saw bold text in ma

Re: Bold text

2002-01-07 Thread David T-G
erything I typed is ASCII because I don't use EBCDIC in my editor :-) What you might mean is something like "a simple ASCII reader". % that because I saw bold text in mails sent to me (back when I was % exclusively using Eudora under Win) that I could do the same. I guess % they w

Re: Bold text

2002-01-07 Thread Nick Wilson
tainly possiblimplementations; if these don't answer > your question, give us more detail. Thanks. Yes I mean /like/ HTML, but *not* HTML as I dump anything of nature also. I guess my understanding of real ASCII text is mistaken. I thought that because I saw bold text in mails sent to me (ba

Re: Bold text

2002-01-07 Thread David T-G
Nick -- ...and then Nick Wilson said... % % Hi folks Hello! % Firstly, yes, I know this is a trivial issue! Well, it depends on your definition of trivial... If you mean "easy", it may not be; if you mean "worthless", then it might be :-) % I use vim as my editor and can't work out how to

Bold text

2002-01-07 Thread Nick Wilson
Hi folks Firstly, yes, I know this is a trivial issue! I use vim as my editor and can't work out how to make portions of my text bold? I know many of you use vim so I hope someone can help. Cheers -- Nick Wilson Tel:+45 3325 0688 Fax:+45 3325 0677 Web:www.explodingnet.com msg