On 2002.01.21, in <20020121164625.GB2845@neuromancer>,
"giorgian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 12:35:15PM -0600, David Champion wrote:
> > This message is in enriched text. Here's some text in boldfaced type.
> > Here's italic. You can also do formatting -- you can
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 12:35:15PM -0600, David Champion wrote:
> This message is in enriched text. Here's some text in boldfaced type.
> Here's italic. You can also do formatting -- you can
everything works for me (mutt 1.3.25) but the italic (i saw it
underlined) and justified text (which was
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, Erika Pacholleck hath spake thusly:
> [07.01.02 12:35 -0600] David Champion <-- :
> > You could use enriched text. It's documented in RFC 1563:
> > ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc1563.txt
>
> Hey great, thanks for the exam
Alas! Erika Pacholleck spake thus:
> (I never learn how to find the number out quickly - yes, I know
> there is a list, but that one is really long :( ).
Do a google search for something like "RFC database", and you should
find a search engine for RFCs, which is very handy.
In fact, the way thin
[07.01.02 12:35 -0600] David Champion <-- :
> You could use enriched text. It's documented in RFC 1563:
> ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc1563.txt
> --- [snipped fine examples ] ---
Hey great, thanks for the examples and especially the RFC number
(I never learn how to find the number out qui
[08.01.02 13:11 +0100] Nick Wilson <-- :
> * Erika Pacholleck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020108 13:09]:
> > is the * the same convention for *bold* as the _ is
> > is for _underline_ ?
>
> > vote here: [x] yes [ ] no
> I think David mentioned USENET conventions earlier in this post.
He was not sure ab
* Erika Pacholleck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020108 13:09]:
> [07.01.02 10:21 -0500] David T-G <-- :
> > ...and then Nick Wilson said...
> > %
> > % I'll stick with using *bold* like this. It works for me :)
> >
> > I certainly agree :-)
>
> I like to add a related question about "conventions":
> is
[07.01.02 10:21 -0500] David T-G <-- :
> ...and then Nick Wilson said...
> %
> % I'll stick with using *bold* like this. It works for me :)
>
> I certainly agree :-)
I like to add a related question about "conventions":
is the * the same convention for *bold* as the _ is
is for _underline_ ?
v
* Samuel Padgett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020108 08:39]:
> Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I use vim as my editor and can't work out how to make portions of my
> > text bold? I know many of you use vim so I hope someone can help.
>
> Some MUAs will display "a^Ha" (aa) as a bold "a".
Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I use vim as my editor and can't work out how to make portions of my
> text bold? I know many of you use vim so I hope someone can help.
Some MUAs will display "a^Ha" (aa) as a bold "a". Is this what
you mean?
Sam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, David Champion hath spake thusly:
> This message is in enriched text. Here's some text in boldfaced type.
> Here's italic. You can also do formatting -- you can
These worked for me (using mutt 1.3.22.1)
>
>
On 2002.01.07, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Nick Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes I mean /like/ HTML, but *not* HTML as I dump anything of nature
> also. I guess my understanding of real ASCII text is mistaken. I thought
> that because I saw bold text in ma
erything I typed is ASCII because I don't use EBCDIC in my editor :-)
What you might mean is something like "a simple ASCII reader".
% that because I saw bold text in mails sent to me (back when I was
% exclusively using Eudora under Win) that I could do the same. I guess
% they w
tainly possiblimplementations; if these don't answer
> your question, give us more detail.
Thanks.
Yes I mean /like/ HTML, but *not* HTML as I dump anything of nature
also. I guess my understanding of real ASCII text is mistaken. I thought
that because I saw bold text in mails sent to me (ba
Nick --
...and then Nick Wilson said...
%
% Hi folks
Hello!
% Firstly, yes, I know this is a trivial issue!
Well, it depends on your definition of trivial... If you mean "easy", it
may not be; if you mean "worthless", then it might be :-)
% I use vim as my editor and can't work out how to
Hi folks
Firstly, yes, I know this is a trivial issue!
I use vim as my editor and can't work out how to make portions of my
text bold? I know many of you use vim so I hope someone can help.
Cheers
--
Nick Wilson
Tel:+45 3325 0688
Fax:+45 3325 0677
Web:www.explodingnet.com
msg
16 matches
Mail list logo