Re: GPG, sign & encrypt

2001-12-01 Thread David T-G
Thorsten -- ...and then Thorsten Haude said... % Moin, % % * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-12-01 11:11]: % >Then, again, you could take the opportunity to give your thirty-second % >(or two-paragraph) spiel on what gpg is and why it's a Good Thing (tm). % Pray do. Concentrate of signatures i

Re: GPG, sign & encrypt

2001-12-01 Thread Thorsten Haude
Moin, * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-12-01 11:11]: >Then, again, you could take the opportunity to give your thirty-second >(or two-paragraph) spiel on what gpg is and why it's a Good Thing (tm). Pray do. Concentrate of signatures in public forums, please. Thorsten -- Violence is the last

Re: GPG, sign & encrypt

2001-12-01 Thread David T-G
Markus -- ...and then Markus Boelter said... % Hi! % % I'm using mutt and gpg. I want to sign each message with gpg. But: % Is it possible to exclude some persons which get mails are not signed? Yep. % % Can I use the "hooks" vor this? I don't wont to press "p" after writing That's exactly

Re: GPG, sign & encrypt

2001-12-01 Thread David T-G
Prahlad, et al -- ...and then Prahlad Vaidyanathan said... % Hi, Hello! % % On Fri, 30 Nov 2001 René <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed into the ether: % > * Markus Boelter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [30-11-2001 11:22]: % > ... % > | Is it possible to exclude some persons which get mails are not signed? %

Re: GPG, sign & encrypt

2001-11-30 Thread Thorsten Haude
Hi, * Prahlad Vaidyanathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-11-30 13:08]: >send-hook ~l set pgp_autosign=yes Could you give me the motivation for this? Off-list, if you like, because I'm sure this comes up twice a year. Thorsten -- They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little tempor

Re: GPG, sign & encrypt

2001-11-30 Thread Prahlad Vaidyanathan
Hi, On Fri, 30 Nov 2001 René <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed into the ether: > * Markus Boelter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [30-11-2001 11:22]: > > | I'm using mutt and gpg. I want to sign each message with gpg. But: > | Is it possible to exclude some persons which get mails are not signed? > > I do it the

Re: GPG, sign & encrypt

2001-11-30 Thread Thorsten Haude
Moin, * Markus Boelter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-11-30 11:20]: >I'm using mutt and gpg. I want to sign each message with gpg. Questionable at best, but completly useless unless you get your keys on the server. >But: Is it possible to exclude some persons which get mails are not >signed? Yes, by se

Re: GPG, sign & encrypt

2001-11-30 Thread René Clerc
* Markus Boelter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [30-11-2001 11:22]: | I'm using mutt and gpg. I want to sign each message with gpg. But: | Is it possible to exclude some persons which get mails are not signed? I do it the other way around: by default, I don't sign any message. And then define persons to wh

GPG, sign & encrypt

2001-11-30 Thread Markus Boelter
msg.pgp Description: PGP message