On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 01:43:30AM +0100, mark wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 07:04:31PM -0500, Tim Legant wrote:
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 12:14:36AM +0100, Mark Sheppard wrote:
I normally save my mail in individual files depending on the user
(set force_name=yes), but for mailing lists I
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 03:48:29PM -0500, Tim Legant wrote:
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 01:43:30AM +0100, Mark Sheppard wrote:
I missed that post - I've only been using mutt (and subscribed to the
list) for a few days, but that sounds like the kind of thing I want.
Unfortunately when I add
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 01:43:30AM +0100, Mark Sheppard wrote:
I missed that post - I've only been using mutt (and subscribed to the
list) for a few days, but that sounds like the kind of thing I want.
Unfortunately when I add this line to .muttrc then run mutt and hit
`s' on an email with
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 07:04:31PM -0500, Tim Legant wrote:
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 12:14:36AM +0100, Mark Sheppard wrote:
I normally save my mail in individual files depending on the user
(set force_name=yes), but for mailing lists I would like to save
them in a file for that particular
I don't know if that's possible. It guess mutt would need to set some
kind of local variable to use later in that command and then discard.
I was thinking about something similar recently. I normally save my
mail in individual files depending on the user (set force_name=yes),
but for mailing
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 12:14:36AM +0100, Mark Sheppard wrote:
I don't know if that's possible. It guess mutt would need to set some
kind of local variable to use later in that command and then discard.
I was thinking about something similar recently. I normally save my
mail in individual
