* Chris Green [2012-12-22 17:15:01 +]:
> On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 10:08:25AM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > * Chris Bannister [12-22-12 09:58]:
> > > On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 01:47:24PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I have added:-
> > > > bindindex n next-unread-mail
* Andre Klärner [12-22-12 14:12]:
[...]
> if you do know where this exactly comes from please tell me. I am still no
> getting why it is behaving the way it is - from my point of view I think
> the browser-view should be usable with the limit functionality.
>
> Can you tell me what way to find
Hi Patrick,
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 12:45:59PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Chris Green [12-22-12 12:14]:
> > Yes, I know I have hijacked 'n', I might change it but that doesn't
> > affect the argument about whether using next-unread-mailbox is better
> > than change-folder for seeing new m
* Chris Green [12-22-12 12:14]:
> Yes, I know I have hijacked 'n', I might change it but that doesn't
> affect the argument about whether using next-unread-mailbox is better
> than change-folder for seeing new mail.
It is apparently not in *your* use case, but I have been using mutt since
~1998 a
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 10:08:25AM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Chris Bannister [12-22-12 09:58]:
> > On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 01:47:24PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> > >
> > > I have added:-
> > > bindindex n next-unread-mailbox
> > >
> > > ... and now I can find new mail in all m
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 03:41:58AM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 01:47:24PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> >
> > I have added:-
> > bindindex n next-unread-mailbox
> >
> > ... and now I can find new mail in all my (mbox) mailboxes without any
> > stupid requiremen
* Chris Bannister [12-22-12 09:58]:
> On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 01:47:24PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> >
> > I have added:-
> > bindindex n next-unread-mailbox
> >
> > ... and now I can find new mail in all my (mbox) mailboxes without any
> > stupid requirements for setting access times
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 01:47:24PM +, Chris Green wrote:
>
> I have added:-
> bindindex n next-unread-mailbox
>
> ... and now I can find new mail in all my (mbox) mailboxes without any
> stupid requirements for setting access times or whatever to the files.
> I always thought it sho
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 03:45:06PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 11:28:09PM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 02:01:47AM +0100, Marco wrote:
> > > On 2012–12–20 Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > >
> > > > You access the mail box and leave, then expect mutt t
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 01:31:02PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 07:03:23AM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 03:45:06PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> >
> > Just a quick grep through the docs reveals:
> >
> > When changing folders, Mutt fills the prompt
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 07:03:23AM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 03:45:06PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> > Yes (not the OP here though), however it has always seemed odd to me
> > that I can't get mutt to take me to all/any mailboxes which have
> > *unread* mail in them. I
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 05:34:13PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Nikola Petrov [12-21-12 16:24]:
> > On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 03:45:06PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> [...]
> > > Yes (not the OP here though), however it has always seemed odd to me
> > > that I can't get mutt to take me to all/a
* Nikola Petrov [12-21-12 16:24]:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 03:45:06PM +, Chris Green wrote:
[...]
> > Yes (not the OP here though), however it has always seemed odd to me
> > that I can't get mutt to take me to all/any mailboxes which have
> > *unread* mail in them. I.e. I want 'c' to take
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 03:45:06PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 11:28:09PM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 02:01:47AM +0100, Marco wrote:
> > > On 2012–12–20 Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > >
> > > > You access the mail box and leave, then expect mutt t
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 07:03:23AM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> Weird, the documentation has (under pattern matching)
>
> ~N New messages
> ~O Old messages
> ~U Unread messages
>
> Just wondering, what is an Unread message if its not New or Old, unless
> its New AND Old together?
^^^
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 03:45:06PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> Yes (not the OP here though), however it has always seemed odd to me
> that I can't get mutt to take me to all/any mailboxes which have
> *unread* mail in them. I.e. I want 'c' to take me to the next mailbox
> with unread mail in it, *
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 11:28:09PM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 02:01:47AM +0100, Marco wrote:
> > On 2012–12–20 Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> >
> > > You access the mail box and leave, then expect mutt to still show
> > > new mail.
> >
> > Yes, I do. If there is a new unre
On 2012–12–21 xing wrote:
> Perhaps this option will help:
>
> From man muttrc:
> --
> mail_check_recent
> Type: boolean
> Default: yes
>
> When set, Mutt will only notify you about new mail that has been received
> since
> the last time you opened the mailbox. When unset, Mutt will notify
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 02:01:47AM +0100, Marco wrote:
> On 2012–12–20 Patrick Shanahan wrote:
>
> > You access the mail box and leave, then expect mutt to still show
> > new mail.
>
> Yes, I do. If there is a new unread message in the mail box and I
> enter and leave it is still contains an unre
* Jamie Paul Griffin [2012-12-21 10:12:06 +]:
> * Marco [2012-12-21 02:01:47 +0100]:
>
> > On 2012–12–20 Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> >
> > > You access the mail box and leave, then expect mutt to still show
> > > new mail.
> >
> > Yes, I do. If there is a new unread message in the mail box
* Marco [2012-12-21 02:01:47 +0100]:
> On 2012–12–20 Patrick Shanahan wrote:
>
> > You access the mail box and leave, then expect mutt to still show
> > new mail.
>
> Yes, I do. If there is a new unread message in the mail box and I
> enter and leave it is still contains an unread message that
On Fri, 21 Dec 2012, Marco wrote:
> > You access the mail box and leave, then expect mutt to still show
> > new mail.
>
> Yes, I do. If there is a new unread message in the mail box and I
> enter and leave it is still contains an unread message that resides
> in the .mailbox/new directory.
Perha
On 2012–12–20 Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> You access the mail box and leave, then expect mutt to still show
> new mail.
Yes, I do. If there is a new unread message in the mail box and I
enter and leave it is still contains an unread message that resides
in the .mailbox/new directory. I'm sorry that
* Marco [12-20-12 16:59]:
> On 2012–12–20 Patrick Shanahan wrote:
>
> > I would guess that "buffy" has reset the file asscess time for .beta and
> > that is what mutt uses to determin new mail.
> >
> > to prove, check the time of "new.mail" before buffy and after...
>
> I just checked using
On 2012–12–20 Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> I would guess that "buffy" has reset the file asscess time for .beta and
> that is what mutt uses to determin new mail.
>
> to prove, check the time of "new.mail" before buffy and after...
I just checked using the “Access”, “Modify” and “Change” time o
* Marco [12-20-12 15:38]:
> On 2012–12–15 Marco wrote:
>
> > “.” shows: “New mail in =.beta”, however
> > “>” shows: “No mailboxes have new mail”
>
> I did not receive any response. Maybe my question was unclear. Let
> me phrase it again.
>
> What is the reason the call “buffy-list” reports “Ne
On 2012–12–15 Marco wrote:
> “.” shows: “New mail in =.beta”, however
> “>” shows: “No mailboxes have new mail”
I did not receive any response. Maybe my question was unclear. Let
me phrase it again.
What is the reason the call “buffy-list” reports “New mail in
=.beta” when at the same time the c
Hi,
I mapped “>” to “next-unread-mailbox”, but it does not work as expected.
Assume that I have two mailboxes, “alpha” and “beta”.
If I am in mailbox “alpha” and a new mail arrives in “beta”, I can press “>”
and jump to mailbox “beta”. That's what I expect.
However, when ten new mails arrive in
28 matches
Mail list logo
