On Mon, Aug 23, 1999 at 09:16:55PM +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote:
> > Due to previous mail loops problems, some of the received
> > lines cause the loop detection to kick in, thus the messages
> > get sent for approval.
> Hmm.. it's quite easy to see where the headers end... Should be easy to not
>
On Mon, Aug 23, 1999 at 06:49:33PM +0100, Steve Kennedy wrote:
> Can people who follow-up to messages on this list and
> include the previous messages (generally tagged on at the
> end), remove the headers (or the irrelevant ones at least).
Ofcourse, replies should _always_ go _under_ the text yo
Can people who follow-up to messages on this list and
include the previous messages (generally tagged on at the
end), remove the headers (or the irrelevant ones at least).
Due to previous mail loops problems, some of the received
lines cause the loop detection to kick in, thus the messages
get se
