Re: Local alternative to Re:

2011-12-03 Thread Dave Dodge
On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 11:12:17AM +0100, Richard wrote: > > The "Subject:" field is the most common and contains a short string > > identifying the topic of the message. When used in a reply, the > > field body MAY start with the string "Re: " (from the Latin "res", > > in the matter of)

Re: Local alternative to Re:

2011-12-03 Thread Richard
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 02:36:10PM -0600, Derek Martin wrote: > On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 02:27:54PM -0600, Derek Martin wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 08:31:21PM +0100, Salve Håkedal wrote: > > > I'd like to have mutt put 'Sv:' instead of 'Re:' when I reply to > > > messages, but can't find how

Re: Local alternative to Re:

2011-12-01 Thread Salve Håkedal
2/12 -11, Michael Ludwig wrote: > Ave Salve! God morgen Mikkel! > Salve Håkedal schrieb am 01.12.2011 um 22:59 (+0100): > > /usr/share/doc/mutt/manual.txt.gz (Debian): > > " > > 3.210. reply_regexp > > > >Type: regular expression > >Default: “^(re([\[0-9\]+])*|aw):[ \t]*” > > > >A

Re: Local alternative to Re:

2011-12-01 Thread David Champion
* On 01 Dec 2011, Derek Martin wrote: > > Incidentally, while looking this up, I ran across a post which > suggested that the intent behind specifying a specific string in the > RFC was that it made two related problems simple: ... > the second is that mail clients can simply > choose to *display

Re: Local alternative to Re:

2011-12-01 Thread Michael Ludwig
Ave Salve! Salve Håkedal schrieb am 01.12.2011 um 22:59 (+0100): > /usr/share/doc/mutt/manual.txt.gz (Debian): > " > 3.210. reply_regexp > >Type: regular expression >Default: “^(re([\[0-9\]+])*|aw):[ \t]*” > >A regular expression used to recognize reply messages when >threading

Re: Local alternative to Re:

2011-12-01 Thread Andreas Kneib
* Salve Håkedal schrieb am 01. Dez. 2011: > Hmm. Ok, then. But this is from > /usr/share/doc/mutt/manual.txt.gz (Debian): > " > 3.210. reply_regexp >Type: regular expression >Default: “^(re([\[0-9\]+])*|aw):[ \t]*” >A regular expression used to recognize reply messages when threadi

Re: Local alternative to Re:

2011-12-01 Thread Derek Martin
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 10:59:04PM +0100, Salve Håkedal wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 08:31:21PM +0100, Salve Håkedal wrote: > > > I'm Norwegian. > > > I'd like to have mutt put 'Sv:' instead of 'Re:' when I reply to > > > messages, but can't find how to do it. > > > > Re: is not from English

Re: Local alternative to Re:

2011-12-01 Thread Salve Håkedal
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 08:31:21PM +0100, Salve Håkedal wrote: > > I'm Norwegian. > > I'd like to have mutt put 'Sv:' instead of 'Re:' when I reply to > > messages, but can't find how to do it. > > Re: is not from English, it's from Latin (and therefore local to no > one, since it's a dead langu

Re: Local alternative to Re:

2011-12-01 Thread Derek Martin
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 02:44:01PM -0600, Derek Martin wrote: > On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 08:40:43PM +, Grant Edwards wrote: > > Personally, I don't care what people use as long as they don't start > > piling up like this: > > > > sv: re: sv: re: ax: er: tr: gq: The original subject here > > An

Re: Local alternative to Re:

2011-12-01 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2011-12-01, Derek Martin wrote: > On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 08:40:43PM +, Grant Edwards wrote: >> Personally, I don't care what people use as long as they don't start >> piling up like this: >> >> sv: re: sv: re: ax: er: tr: gq: The original subject here > > And that is exactly why it IS spe

Re: Local alternative to Re:

2011-12-01 Thread Derek Martin
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 08:40:43PM +, Grant Edwards wrote: > Personally, I don't care what people use as long as they don't start > piling up like this: > > sv: re: sv: re: ax: er: tr: gq: The original subject here And that is exactly why it IS specified in RFC 2822. -- Derek D. Martinh

Re: Local alternative to Re:

2011-12-01 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2011-12-01, Derek Martin wrote: > On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 08:31:21PM +0100, Salve Håkedal wrote: >> I'm Norwegian. >> I'd like to have mutt put 'Sv:' instead of 'Re:' when I reply to >> messages, but can't find how to do it. > > Re: is not from English, it's from Latin (and therefore local to n

Re: Local alternative to Re:

2011-12-01 Thread Derek Martin
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 02:27:54PM -0600, Derek Martin wrote: > On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 08:31:21PM +0100, Salve Håkedal wrote: > > I'd like to have mutt put 'Sv:' instead of 'Re:' when I reply to > > messages, but can't find how to do it. > > Re: is not from English, it's from Latin (and therefore

Re: Local alternative to Re:

2011-12-01 Thread Derek Martin
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 09:01:46PM +0100, Ivo Engelhardt wrote: > On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 08:31:21PM +0100, Salve Håkedal wrote: > > Hi > > > > I'm Norwegian. > > I'd like to have mutt put 'Sv:' instead of 'Re:' when I reply to > > messages, but can't find how to do it. > > Try this in you .muttr

Re: Local alternative to Re:

2011-12-01 Thread Derek Martin
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 08:31:21PM +0100, Salve Håkedal wrote: > I'm Norwegian. > I'd like to have mutt put 'Sv:' instead of 'Re:' when I reply to > messages, but can't find how to do it. Re: is not from English, it's from Latin (and therefore local to no one, since it's a dead language), and if I

Re: Local alternative to Re:

2011-12-01 Thread Ivo Engelhardt
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 08:31:21PM +0100, Salve Håkedal wrote: > Hi > > I'm Norwegian. > I'd like to have mutt put 'Sv:' instead of 'Re:' when I reply to > messages, but can't find how to do it. Try this in you .muttrc: set reply_regexp="^Sv:[ \t]*" -- Ivo Engelhardt

Local alternative to Re:

2011-12-01 Thread Salve Håkedal
Hi I'm Norwegian. I'd like to have mutt put 'Sv:' instead of 'Re:' when I reply to messages, but can't find how to do it. By the way: any other Norwegians on this mailing list? (Any other Norwegians using mutt at all?) -- Salve