Re: More powerful scoring in mutt.

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
On Wed, Jun 23, 1999 at 10:19:17AM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote: > > So ':score ~s foo ' should do what you want just fine. > >From manual.txt: Usage: score pattern value Should that be ':score "~s foo" ' ? Otherwise mutt reports "score: too many arguments" -- (T.) Michael Sanders int

Re: More powerful scoring in mutt.

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
Quoth Jeremy Blosser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > It's not prompting you for the info, but anything you can stick in your > .muttrc can be done from a running mutt by doing : > > So ':score ~s foo ' should do what you want just fine. > Yes, but then what if you want to save the scores you've set in th

Re: More powerful scoring in mutt.

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
Warning Could not process message with given Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=bjuZg6miEcdLYP6q; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"

Re: More powerful scoring in mutt.

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
On Tue, Jun 22, 1999 at 10:54:59PM -0900, Matt Armstrong wrote: > 2 - No way to show threads but still sort by score. In the threaded > display, gnus can sort first by thread, then by score. Maybe > something like: > > sort=thread,score set sort=treads set sort_aux=score seems to work f

More powerful scoring in mutt.

1999-06-22 Thread Anonymous
For the past four years I've used Gnus under Emacs as my MUA. I got tired of the slowness and switched to mutt. I think mutt is awesome, but I miss one thing from Gnus: scoring. Mutt has the beginnings of it. I'll list what I miss and I solicit comments about how I might go about getting a sim