On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 11:42:39PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 08:24:11AM +0200, Alexander Dahl wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 01:47:15PM +1000, m...@raf.org wrote:
> This might not be the right place to report this but
Is the mutt mailing list the right place to
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 08:24:11AM +0200, Alexander Dahl wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 01:47:15PM +1000, m...@raf.org wrote:
> > This might not be the right place to report this but
>
> Is the mutt mailing list the right place to discuss neomutt problems?
> (Serious question, I don't actually
Hello raf,
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 01:47:15PM +1000, m...@raf.org wrote:
> This might not be the right place to report this but
> I've just discovered that the mutt package on debian9
> stable (or rather NeoMutt 20170113 (1.7.2)) segfaults
> if you ask it to write to a readonly mbox file. It
>
Hi,
This might not be the right place to report this but
I've just discovered that the mutt package on debian9
stable (or rather NeoMutt 20170113 (1.7.2)) segfaults
if you ask it to write to a readonly mbox file. It
happened several times yesterday before I realised what
was wrong (and yes, I did
