jbw --
...and then jbw said...
%
% On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 09:48:13AM -0500, David T-G spewed into the ether:
% [snip]
...
% > Take a look at my tests and see if any of them give you the same problem
...
% I was able to decrypt & read all of the emails you sent except for
% the signed+pasted-enc
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 09:48:13AM -0500, David T-G spewed into the ether:
[snip]
> From my [completely amateur] review of the file and comparison with my
> own tests, it looks as though your correspondent encrypted a file, pasted
> the encrypted text into a message, and then in-line signed that m
jbw --
...and then jbw said...
%
% On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 05:39:56AM -0500, David T-G spewed into the ether:
% [clip]
...
% > You should check the exit code of gpg. If it's nonzero and you haven't
% > specifically set mutt to recognize "good signature text" then mutt will
% > see it as a failu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* jbw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-17 16:12]:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 03:35:29PM -0700, Michael Maibaum spewed into the ether:
> > FWIW, I don't find the key...
> >
> > Michael
> >
> I just resent to keyserver wwwkeys.nl.pgp.net. Try it now.
Muc
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 03:35:29PM -0700, Michael Maibaum spewed into the ether:
> * jbw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-17 14:54]:
> > On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 05:39:56AM -0500, David T-G spewed into the ether:
> > [clip]
> > > % Problem...
> > > %
> > > % When I receive mime encoded msgs I can't re
* jbw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-17 14:54]:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 05:39:56AM -0500, David T-G spewed into the ether:
> [clip]
> > % Problem...
> > %
> > % When I receive mime encoded msgs I can't read it and mutt reports that
> > % the signature couldn't be verified even though the screen o
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 05:39:56AM -0500, David T-G spewed into the ether:
[clip]
> % Problem...
> %
> % When I receive mime encoded msgs I can't read it and mutt reports that
> % the signature couldn't be verified even though the screen output
> % reports a good signature. And I can't read the m
jbw --
...and then jbw said...
%
% I'm using mutt 1.4 and gpg 1.07.
Sounds good.
%
% Until I upgraded to mutt 1.4 I couldn't read encrypted messages that
Well, encrypted messages sent in in-line style, anyway.
% were sent to me. I had to save the whole msg as a text file and decrypt it
%
I'm using mutt 1.4 and gpg 1.07.
Until I upgraded to mutt 1.4 I couldn't read encrypted messages that
were sent to me. I had to save the whole msg as a text file and decrypt it
from the commandline with gpg. With 1.4 I'm able to do ESC Shift P to
read encrypted messages that are sent to me in th
> What do I do to get the key id into mutt so I can encrypt mail?
try www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/Mutt-GnuPG
--
"If you think education is expensive, try ignorance." ~unknown
"Put your hand on a hot stove for a minute, and it seems like an hour.
Sit with a pretty girl for an hour, and it seems li
I'm having pgp headaches. I'm running redhat 6.2 and I was using gpg
for the address [EMAIL PROTECTED] I was unable to get it to work with pgp
6.5.3 which is on the wife's windoze box. So I revoked the gpg key and
created a keypair for command-line pgp which I installed (version
6.5.2). I used the
* David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000627 20:09]:
> % > has the [built-in] ability to create in-line signatures and encryption;
> % > check out the pgp6.rc file supplied with the tarball.
> % I saw that there is a pgp_clearsign_command, but how do I activate it...
> That much I don't know; I haven't
* David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000627 19:50]:
> % * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000627 19:27]:
> % > % The Application/PGP format is very close to that used by Outlook. The
> % > Well, that's a good start :-)
> % Yup, somehow Outlook only understands plain text in PGP..
> Plain text? Does t
Shane, et al --
...and then Shane Wegner said...
%
% The Application/PGP format is very close to that used by Outlook. The
Well, that's a good start :-)
% following is a bit of MUTT output.
%
% Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
% Mime-Version: 1.0
% Content-Type: application/pgp; x-action=enc
Yeah, I was to implement PGP/GPG in my company and we have come to
conclusion that for Linux users (20 of us) we use GPG and for Windows
(100 of them) use PGP coz that has got a GUI of some sort.. Now, none of
the Windows box can read our signature, be in traditional or not..
Windows somehow needs
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2000 at 03:15:56PM -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 23, 2000 at 01:10:34PM -0700, Shane Wegner wrote:
> > -> I am using GPG and a RSA key to encrypt but the message shows up in outlook
> > -> as x.dat as a file attachment and the decrypt option from the PGP menu
>
On Fri, Jun 23, 2000 at 03:15:56PM -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2000 at 01:10:34PM -0700, Shane Wegner wrote:
> -> I am using GPG and a RSA key to encrypt but the message shows up in outlook
> -> as x.dat as a file attachment and the decrypt option from the PGP menu
> -> does
On Fri, Jun 23, 2000 at 01:10:34PM -0700, Shane Wegner wrote:
-> Hi all,
->
-> I have been using PGP with Mutt now for quite some time and have had no
-> problems. I am however, experiencing difficulty encrypting to someone using
-> PGP version 6 with Microsoft Outlook.
->
-> I am using GPG and
Hi all,
I have been using PGP with Mutt now for quite some time and have had no
problems. I am however, experiencing difficulty encrypting to someone using
PGP version 6 with Microsoft Outlook.
I am using GPG and a RSA key to encrypt but the message shows up in outlook
as x.dat as a file at
It's probably cockpit error on my part, but I get the following when
trying to extract keys:
No keys found in '/tmp/mutt-scv-cse-6-10047-119'.
Keyring add error.
Regardless of the key version or origin. There is indeed a key though.
Pretty Good Privacy(tm) 2.6.2 - Public-key encryption for th
20 matches
Mail list logo
