On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
> * Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-18 15:33]:
> > > > one of the annoying things about vim-users is that most
> > > > of them don't know much about vi, and tend to ascribe
> > > > lots of things to vim that are standard in vi.
> > >
> > > Hey
* Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-18 15:33]:
> > > one of the annoying things about vim-users is that most
> > > of them don't know much about vi, and tend to ascribe
> > > lots of things to vim that are standard in vi.
> >
> > Hey, Sven, calm down, will ya? ;)
>
> He's tamer than h
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 02:46:16PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
> and you don't want to share you #editor value with us? hint hint
> besides, you might want to upgrade to vim 6.1 ...
>
vi launched from a shell says:
:ve
VIM - Vi IMproved 5.
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, darren chamberlain wrote:
> * Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-18 09:04]:
> > On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, darren chamberlain wrote:
> >
> > > vim has a :version command, which other vi clones don't seem to; vim
> >
> > :ve is standard.
> > (:version is also recognized b
* Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-18 09:04]:
> On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, darren chamberlain wrote:
>
> > vim has a :version command, which other vi clones don't seem to; vim
>
> :ve is standard.
> (:version is also recognized by all of the vi's that I recall -
> including elvis).
OK, I
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, darren chamberlain wrote:
> vim has a :version command, which other vi clones don't seem to; vim
:ve is standard.
(:version is also recognized by all of the vi's that I recall -
including elvis).
> with cp set will still respond to :version, while elvis will not (well,
> it
* Dave Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-18 12:24]:
> I think I have narrowed down the issue I am
> experiencing to being mutt specific.
>
> When I am composing / editing a messge in mutt, it
> seems that my .vimrc is not being fully read, if at
> all. Also, vim-specific features like tab expans
* Dave Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-18 08:23]:
> Is there a way to tweak the way mutt lauches vi to get these features
> to run in a 'vimmish' way?
To what is $editor set? If it is set to 'vi', then you might be getting
either vim in compatible mode, or not vim (i.e., the default vi on yo
