Turning off 'Sender' header for mailing list

2022-05-18 Thread Kevin J. McCarthy
Hi Everyone, Recently Gmail has started bouncing emails with any DKIM failures. One source of these failures is the: 'Sender: Mutt-users ' header added by the mailing list. I realize some of you may be filtering based on that header, but I'm seeing a large number of bounce-unsubscribes due

Re: Changing X-Sender header

2000-02-10 Thread Wouter Hanegraaff
On Thu, Feb 10, 2000 at 11:02:37AM +0100, Wouter Hanegraaff wrote: > On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 08:02:40AM -0800, Claus Assmann wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 09, 2000, Lars Hecking wrote: > > > > > The Sender: header is written by the MTA (eg. sendmail). > > > >

Re: Changing X-Sender header

2000-02-10 Thread Lars Hecking
Wouter Hanegraaff writes: > On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 08:02:40AM -0800, Claus Assmann wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 09, 2000, Lars Hecking wrote: > > > > > The Sender: header is written by the MTA (eg. sendmail). > > > > sendmail does not generate a "Sender:&quo

Re: Changing X-Sender header

2000-02-10 Thread Wouter Hanegraaff
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 08:02:40AM -0800, Claus Assmann wrote: > On Wed, Feb 09, 2000, Lars Hecking wrote: > > > The Sender: header is written by the MTA (eg. sendmail). > > sendmail does not generate a "Sender:" header. > Which MTA does it? Postfix, if I set

Re: Changing X-Sender header

2000-02-09 Thread Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
Claus Assmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Wed, Feb 09, 2000, Lars Hecking wrote: > > > The Sender: header is written by the MTA (eg. sendmail). > > sendmail does not generate a "Sender:" header. > Which MTA does it? exim does, sometimes.

Re: Changing X-Sender header

2000-02-09 Thread Eugene Lee
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 01:17:50PM -0600, Kent R. Frazier wrote: :On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 05:05:30PM +, Lars Hecking wrote: :> Claus Assmann writes: :> > On Wed, Feb 09, 2000, Lars Hecking wrote: :> > :> > > The Sender: header is written by the MTA (eg. sendmail).

Re: Changing X-Sender header

2000-02-09 Thread Kent R. Frazier
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 05:05:30PM +, Lars Hecking wrote: > Claus Assmann writes: > > On Wed, Feb 09, 2000, Lars Hecking wrote: > > > > > The Sender: header is written by the MTA (eg. sendmail). > > > > sendmail does not generate a "Sender:&q

Re: Changing X-Sender header

2000-02-09 Thread Lars Hecking
Claus Assmann writes: > On Wed, Feb 09, 2000, Lars Hecking wrote: > > > The Sender: header is written by the MTA (eg. sendmail). > > sendmail does not generate a "Sender:" header. > Which MTA does it? Mutt doesn't, either. What does this leave? Mailing list software?

Re: Changing X-Sender header

2000-02-09 Thread Lars Hecking
Kent R. Frazier writes: > Sorry, I really ment the "Sender" header, not "X-Sender". The Sender: header is written by the MTA (eg. sendmail).

Re: Changing X-Sender header

2000-02-09 Thread Claus Assmann
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000, Lars Hecking wrote: > The Sender: header is written by the MTA (eg. sendmail). sendmail does not generate a "Sender:" header. Which MTA does it?

RE: Changing X-Sender header

2000-02-09 Thread Kent R. Frazier
Sorry, I really ment the "Sender" header, not "X-Sender". Kent -- Kent R. Frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG Fingerprint: 5EAC 06F2 6D79 F329 5C45 19AA EC0F 8F5A 9F2E 5558 GPG Key at: http://www.pobox.com/~kfrazier/public-keys.html Linux: The Operating System for the GNU Millennium

Re: Changing X-Sender header

2000-02-09 Thread Christopher Uy
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 08:26:28AM -0600, Kent R. Frazier wrote: > I'm not sure if this relates to mutt or sendmail, I'm new to both. > Would someone be kind enough to tell me how to change the X-Sender > header? I have attached a copy of what it currently shows. >

Changing X-Sender header

2000-02-09 Thread Kent R. Frazier
I'm not sure if this relates to mutt or sendmail, I'm new to both. Would someone be kind enough to tell me how to change the X-Sender header? I have attached a copy of what it currently shows. Thank you, Kent -- Kent R. Frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG Fingerprint: 5EAC 06F

Re: Sender header?

1999-03-25 Thread Lars Hecking
David DeSimone writes: > Lars Hecking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Ken W writes: > > > I am not sure if this is from mutt, but I have seen a Sender: header > > > on another account with mutt. I want to kill this. Anyone? > > > &g

Re: Sender header?

1999-03-24 Thread David DeSimone
Lars Hecking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ken W writes: > > I am not sure if this is from mutt, but I have seen a Sender: header > > on another account with mutt. I want to kill this. Anyone? > > No you don't want to kill this. See RFC 822 4.4. Maybe h

Re: Sender header?

1999-03-24 Thread Lars Hecking
Ken W writes: > I am not sure if this is from mutt, but I have seen a Sender: header > on another account with mutt. I want to kill this. Anyone? No you don't want to kill this. See RFC 822 4.4. In some cases, the Sender: header is the only reliable header which tells you w

Sender header?

1999-03-24 Thread Ken W
I am not sure if this is from mutt, but I have seen a Sender: header on another account with mutt. I want to kill this. Anyone? Thanks. -Ken