Re: Threading Lyris (removing [list] prefix from Subject)

2002-05-16 Thread David T-G
Mike -- ...and then Michael P. Soulier said... % % On 14/05/02 Christopher Swingley did speaketh: % % > > I hate Lyris. Lyris is so nonstandard that one would think it was a ... % % Me too. They set up Lyris in-house here, and I've ignored the project and % put up my own GNU Mailman server

Re: Threading Lyris (removing [list] prefix from Subject)

2002-05-15 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Petr Baudis [05/15/02 16:19:30 CEST] wrote: > I have > set reply_regexp="^((\\[|\\()[^]]+(\\]|\\)))?([ \t]*(re([\\[0-9\\]+])*|aw):[ \t]*)?" > (original is set reply_regexp="^(re([\\[0-9\\]+])*|aw):[ \t]*") > in my .muttrc - this makes mutt to ignore [anything] or (anything) (that can be

Re: Threading Lyris (removing [list] prefix from Subject)

2002-05-15 Thread Petr Baudis
Dear diary, on Tue, May 14, 2002 at 08:15:12PM CEST, I got a letter, where Christopher Swingley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me, that... > Mutters, > > One of the mailing lists I subscribe to uses the Lyris ListManager > software, which attaches '[listname]' to the Subject: line of all > the messages

Re: Threading Lyris (removing [list] prefix from Subject)

2002-05-14 Thread Michael P. Soulier
On 14/05/02 Christopher Swingley did speaketh: > > I hate Lyris. Lyris is so nonstandard that one would think it was a > > Microsoft in-house project. > > I'm right there with you. Me too. They set up Lyris in-house here, and I've ignored the project and put up my own GNU Mailman server ins

Re: Re: Threading Lyris (removing [list] prefix from Subject)

2002-05-14 Thread Will Yardley
Christopher Swingley wrote: > So does this mean that the decoding I mentioned above would need to be > built into mutt? I don't know how much one-off kludging there is > inside mutt to fix non-standard behavior in other parts of the email > conversation, but this one probably wouldn't be too ha

Re: Re: Threading Lyris (removing [list] prefix from Subject)

2002-05-14 Thread Christopher Swingley
David, (sorry for the repeat -- I forgot to 'L' when I replied) * David Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-May-14 12:00 AKDT]: > On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 10:15:12AM -0800, Christopher Swingley wrote: > > One of the mailing lists I subscribe to uses the Lyris ListManager > > software, which attaches

Re: Threading Lyris (removing [list] prefix from Subject)

2002-05-14 Thread David Kelly
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 10:15:12AM -0800, Christopher Swingley wrote: > Mutters, > > One of the mailing lists I subscribe to uses the Lyris ListManager > software, which attaches '[listname]' to the Subject: line of all > the messages send out. Unlike most list manager software, which > puts the

Re: Threading Lyris (removing [list] prefix from Subject)

2002-05-14 Thread Daniel Eisenbud
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 10:15:12AM -0800, Christopher Swingley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mutters, > > One of the mailing lists I subscribe to uses the Lyris ListManager > software, which attaches '[listname]' to the Subject: line of all > the messages send out. Unlike most list manager softw

Re: Threading Lyris (removing [list] prefix from Subject)

2002-05-14 Thread Cedric Duval
Hi Christopher, > How might one go about fixing this on my end? I have a feeling that > a procmail recipe that uses a sed filter for the Subject: line might > do the trick. Can anyone suggest a recipe, or perhaps a simpler > mutt-centric solution? you might try something like this: #