On Thursday, 21.09.2000 at 13:47 +0200, Byrial Jensen wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 10:22:20 +0100, Dave Ewart wrote:
> > I'm not sure that's the cause of the error message in this case - I
> > noticed the message change from "PGP signature verified OK" (or whatever
> > it says) to "PGP signat
On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 10:22:20 +0100, Dave Ewart wrote:
> I'm not sure that's the cause of the error message in this case - I
> noticed the message change from "PGP signature verified OK" (or whatever
> it says) to "PGP signature could NOT be verified" when verifying THE
> EXACT SAME MESSAGE aft
On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 10:22:20AM +0100, Dave Ewart wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 21.09.2000 at 09:18 +0200, Rudi van Houten wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 04:16:47PM -0500, Ben Beuchler wrote:
> > > To what is mutt referring when it says "PGP signature could NOT be
> > > verified."? gpg itsel
On Thursday, 21.09.2000 at 09:18 +0200, Rudi van Houten wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 04:16:47PM -0500, Ben Beuchler wrote:
> > To what is mutt referring when it says "PGP signature could NOT be
> > verified."? gpg itself is returning no errors:
> >
> > [-- PGP output follows (current time:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 04:16:47PM -0500, Ben Beuchler wrote:
> To what is mutt referring when it says "PGP signature could NOT be
> verified."? gpg itself is returning no errors:
>
> [-- PGP output follows (current time: Wed Sep 20 16:14:34 2000) --]
> [-- End of PGP output --]
>
> [-- The f
To what is mutt referring when it says "PGP signature could NOT be
verified."? gpg itself is returning no errors:
[-- PGP output follows (current time: Wed Sep 20 16:14:34 2000) --]
[-- End of PGP output --]
[-- The following data is PGP/MIME encrypted --]
[-- End of PGP/MIME encrypted dat
