On 2019-07-30, José María Mateos wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:08:02AM -0400, Mark H. Wood wrote:
>
>> You may want to examine some netnews clients for ideas. They tend to
>> have exactly this: a database of killed threads, easily augmented with
>> a simple keystroke.
>
> This. Having used s
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:08:02AM -0400, Mark H. Wood wrote:
> You may want to examine some netnews clients for ideas. They tend to
> have exactly this: a database of killed threads, easily augmented with
> a simple keystroke.
This. Having used slrn in the past, I was surprised mutt didn't have
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 07:40:02AM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día martes, julio 30, 2019 a las 06:36:35a. m. +0200, Francesco Ariis
> escribió:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 06:31:42AM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm a mutt user for many years. From time to time I do miss a fe
On Jul 30, 2019 at 7:40, Matthias Apitz wrote:
A solution must be based on some kind of a local "database" file of
threads marked as "bad" threads (perhaps as patterns) and one must
actively store the given "bad" thread into it, for example with M
and then a D would later, even in the next mutt
Hello Matthias,
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 07:40:02AM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> I Cc'ed the author of the article: fa...@ariis.it
> Please keep him/her in Cc when you reply.
Big smile, the author and the poster are in this case the
same person: myself. :P
> Thanks for this pointer. The doc des
El día martes, julio 30, 2019 a las 06:36:35a. m. +0200, Francesco Ariis
escribió:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 06:31:42AM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> >
> > I'm a mutt user for many years. From time to time I do miss a feature in
> > mutt to mark a given thread as "do not present any mail of this
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 06:31:42AM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
>
> I'm a mutt user for many years. From time to time I do miss a feature in
> mutt to mark a given thread as "do not present any mail of this thread
> anymore, just collapse them and mark for deletion on exit".
>
> This is such a thre
