Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > So if everyone has a mail filter then why use "alternates" at all?
>
> Because $alternates has a lot less to do with filtering incoming mail
> than it has to do with getting the correct From: address when you
> reply to mail, etc.
In my eyes, the ma
Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> * David Champion ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [991112 01:23]:
> > > I want an extra flag for work related mails
> > > so they wont show up as non-personal mails.
> > I have four jobs and a major identity crisis.
> > I'd like to extend Sven's request to six flags, p
* David Champion ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [991112 01:23]:
> > I want an extra flag for work related mails
> > so they wont show up as non-personal mails.
> I have four jobs and a major identity crisis.
> I'd like to extend Sven's request to six flags, please. [...]
> I use procmail to do it instead.
On 1999.11.11, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Sven Guckes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want an extra flag for work related mails
> so they wont show up as non-personal mails.
>
> And I want an extra pattern modifier for these
> so I wont have to use long regexp with limit commands.
I have
* Byrial Jensen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [99 23:21]:
> > Example: set [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >macro index ,W "l~N ~W\n"
> It isn't necessary because you can put
> your work alternates directly into your macros:
> macro index ,W "l ~N ~C ^^guckes@work\\.com$\n" "Limit to new work mails"
OF C
